Case law

Brown v. Transcon Associates

982 S.W.2d 717 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1998

Appellants, Transcon Associates (“employer”) and Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance Company (“insurer”), appeal the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in favor of respondent, Robert Brown, on his

Brown v. State

561 S.W.3d 421 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2018

Dismang v. State , 207 S.W.3d 663 , 670 (Mo. App. [S.D.] 2006). We cannot act as Brown's advocate by supplying arguments for why the motion court may be wrong or the above-cited cases distinguishable. See Mercer v. … State v. Starks , 856 S.W.2d 334 , 336 (Mo. banc 1993).

State v. Brown

921 S.W.2d 146 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1996

Brown. The trial court found the prosecution of the charge violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because defendant previously had his license administratively suspended. … This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Mayo, 915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996).

Brown v. State

559 S.W.3d 115 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 2018

PER CURIAM James Brown ("Brown") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. … We hold that Brown did not overcome the strong presumption that trial counsel's strategy was reasonable under Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Brown v. Keuffer

961 S.W.2d 915 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1998

The lawsuit is a continuation of the dispute decided by this court in Kueffer v. Brown, 879 S.W.2d 658 (Mo.App. E.D.1994).

Slider v. Brown Shoe Company

308 S.W.2d 306 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1957

In this proceeding under the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Law, Brown Shoe Company (the employer) appeals from the judgment of the circuit court affirming the final award of the Industrial Commission of Missouri dated January … E. g., Monical v. Armour & Co., Mo., 307 S.W.2d 389 ; Hall v. Spot Martin, Mo., 304 S.W.2d 844, 848-849, 852 ; Conley v. Meyers, Mo., 304 S.W.2d 9, 15-16 (7); Garrison v.

Brown v. American Bridge

859 S.W.2d 270 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1993

Montgomery v. Brown

538 S.W.3d 378 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2018

Brown ("Husband") appeals the denial of his Rule 74.05(d) motion to set aside a default judgment. 1 In his sole point on appeal, Husband claims the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to set aside a default judgment … Pearson v. Koster , 367 S.W.3d 36 , 44 (Mo. banc 2012).

Heitman v. Brown Group, Inc.

638 S.W.2d 316 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1982

Schmidt v. Schmidt, 617 S.W.2d 601, 604 (Mo.App.1981). … White v. Mulvania, 575 S.W.2d 184, 188 (Mo.banc 1978). 2 .

Brown v. Treasurer of Missouri

795 S.W.2d 479 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 1990

Low v. A.C.F. Industries, 772 S.W.2d 904, 906 (Mo.App.1989). … Anderson v. Emerson Electric Co., 698 S.W.2d 574, 576 (Mo.App.1985).

Brown v. Rigazzi's, Inc.

848 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1992

Brown v. State

867 S.W.2d 239 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1993

Movant Gary Leon Brown appeals from a denial, without evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 1 motion, seeking to vacate a judgment and sentence on a plea of guilty to murder in the second degree. … Wedlow v. State, 841 S.W.2d at 217[11]; White v. State, 781 S.W.2d 167, 168-169 [4] (Mo.App.1989); Pines v. State, 778 S.W.2d 724, 726 [2] (Mo.App.1989); Robinson v.

Brown v. Director of Revenue

34 S.W.3d 166 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2000

Cox v. Director of Revenue, 974 S.W.2d 633 (Mo.App.1998), Pointer v. Director of Revenue, 891 S.W.2d 876 (Mo.App.1995), and Stallmann v. … In Jackson v.

Brown Bros. v. Gilliam

53 Mo. App. 376 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1893

Brown v. Copeland

780 S.W.2d 68 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1989

Tyler v. “Ron”Deputy Sheriff, 574 F.2d 427, 429 [3] (8th Cir.1978). … Sheley v. Dugger, 833 F.2d 1420, 1428 (11th Cir.1987); Green v. Ferrell, 801 F.2d 765, 772 [5] (5th Cir.1986).

Brown v. State

778 S.W.2d 336 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1989

Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. banc 1989). Movant’s motion was not filed when mailed, but when lodged in the office of the circuit clerk. See State v. Johnson, 522 S.W.2d 106, 110 [4] (Mo.App.1975).

Brown v. State

629 S.W.2d 420 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1981

The latest ruling is in State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo. banc 1981). 3 This court must follow the supreme court’s ruling. The judgment is affirmed. CRIST, P. J., and REINHARD, J., concur. . … State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo. banc 1981) confirms the earlier rulings in Sours I and II. Sours v.

State v. Brown

768 S.W.2d 215 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1989

The defendant cites Terry v. … Brown’s right to be free from double jeopardy. See Oregon v. Kennedy, supra, (no intent found when prosecutor asked a witness if the defendant was a “crook”); State v.

Brown v. State

783 S.W.2d 428 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1989

Movant, Glen Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court dismissed movant’s motion as untimely because it was not filed before June 30, 1988. Rule 29.15(m). … Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 696 [3] (Mo.banc 1989). The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm.

Brown v. State

793 S.W.2d 204 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1990

Movant, Richard Duane Brown, appeals from the denial, without evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 1 motion. Movant filed the Rule 29.15 motion pro se on September 20, 1988. … State v. Brown, 708 S.W.2d 140 (Mo. banc 1986); on remand, State v. Brown, 716 S.W.2d 436 (Mo.App.1986). The record clearly shows sentence was pronounced before January 1, 1988.