Case law

Brown v. State

751 S.W.2d 812 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1988

Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 , 106 S.Ct. 366, 369 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985). “[T]he two-part Strickland v. … See McMahon v.

Brown-Scott v. Davis

216 Mo. App. 530 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1925

In Hicks v. … [Pointer v. Construction Co., 269 Mo. 104 , 189 S.W. 805 ; Bergfeld v. Railways Co., 285 Mo. 654 , 227 S.W. 106 ; Price v. Railroad, 220 Mo. 435 , 119 S.W. 932 ; Orcutt v.

State v. Brown

780 S.W.2d 716 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1989

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Fernandez, 691 S.W.2d 267, 269 (Mo. banc 1985); State v. Cross, 757 S.W.2d 613, 614 (Mo.App.1988). … State v. Brown, 762 S.W.2d 471, 475 (Mo.App.1988); State v. Berry, supra, at 952 . The defendant also looks to Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567 , 108 S.Ct. 1975 , 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988).

Brown v. State

753 S.W.2d 22 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1988

Chapman v. State, 720 S.W.2d 17, 18 (Mo.App.1986). … Bailey v. State, 738 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Mo.App.1987). There is no routine duty on counsel to request a psychiatric examination of a client.

Brown v. Van Noy

879 S.W.2d 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1994

Thiele v. … Kelly v. Jackson, 798 S.W.2d 699, 701 (Mo. banc 1990).

State v. Brown

820 S.W.2d 560 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1991

Brown v. Kroger Company

358 S.W.2d 429 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1962

This contention was raised in the former case (Brown v. Kroger Co., supra, Mo., 344 S.W.2d 80 ). … Skadal v. Brown, Mo., 351 S.W.2d 684, 689-690 ; Jones v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 353 Mo. 163 , 182 S.W.2d 157, 159 ; Weber v. St. Louis Public Service Co., Mo.App., 232 S.W.2d 209 , 211; Parks v.

Brown v. Upjohn Co.

655 S.W.2d 758 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 1983

Fine v. Waldman Mercantile Co., 412 S.W.2d 549, 551 (Mo.App.1967). See also, Cooper v. Finke, 376 S.W.2d 225, 229 (Mo.1964) and Taylor v. Royal Insurance Co., 34 F.R.D. 132, 133-34 (W.D.Mo.1963). … Blackburn v. Swift, 457 S.W.2d 805, 807 (Mo.1970); Cooper v. Finke, supra.

Oberkramer v. Brown

635 S.W.2d 63 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1982

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 36 (Mo.1976). Murphy v. … Tiede v. Tiede, 231 S.W. 950 , 953 (Mo.1921). Point denied.

Brown v. Johnson

236 Mo. App. 817 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1942

Brown v. Morgan County

212 S.W.3d 200 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 2007

They support this argument with Brown’s testimony that she had used the steps approximately 100 times before her fall. In Harris v. … Brown denies making this statement and at this stage in the litigation the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to Brown. Hoffman v. Union Elec.

Brown v. McIBS, Inc.

722 S.W.2d 337 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1986

By resolution of the Board the letter written by Ernest Winders, dated March 2, 1983, is hereby approved. Sam Brown will function in the future as consultant to the company at the discretion of Mr. … Spruce Co. v. Mays, 333 Mo. 582 , 62 S.W.2d 824, 828 (1933). In Tnemec Company, Inc. v.

Brown v. State

629 S.W.2d 681 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1981

The latest ruling is in State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo. banc 1981). 3 This court must follow the supreme court’s ruling. The judgment is affirmed. CRIST, P. J., and REINHARD, J., concur. . … State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo.banc 1981) confirms the earlier rulings in Sours I and II. Sours v.

Brown Group, Inc. v. George F. Brown & Sons, Inc.

963 S.W.2d 285 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1997

Bull, 619 S.W.2d 913, 922 , (Mo.App.1981); and (4) the application of Broker’s argument would have the repugnant result of affording no coverage to Brown, Allison v. National Ins. … Tresner v. State Farm Ins. Co., 913 S.W.2d 7, 15 (Mo.1995); Weaver v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 936 S.W.2d 818, 821 (Mo.1997). We agree.

Jackson County Board of Election Commissioners Ex Rel. Brown v. City of Lee's Summit

277 S.W.3d 740 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2008

See City of Los Angeles v. … Indeed, the Election Board itself cites us to such a case. In Levinson v. City of Kansas City, 43 S.W.3d 312 (Mo.App.

Brown v. Hamilton Insurance

956 S.W.2d 417 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1997

Hellmann v. Droege’s Super Market, Inc., 943 S.W.2d 655, 657 (MoApp. E.D.1997). … Spring v. Kansas City Area Transp. Auth., 873 S.W.2d 224, 225 (Mo. banc 1994).

Brown v. Lyle

236 Mo. App. 1041 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1942

[Friesz et al. v. Friesz, 127 S. W. (2d) 714 .] The defendants cite Davis v. Stevens, 124 S. W. (2d) 1132 .

Brown v. Luchsinger

208 Mo. App. 492 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1922

In Pratt v. Irwin, 189 S. … [Knisely v. Leathe, 256 Mo. 341 , 166 S. W. 257 ; Bird v. Rowell, 180 Mo. App. 421 , 167 S. W. 1172 ; Lombard v. Sills, 170 Mo. App. 555 , 157 S.

Brown v. Kone, Inc.

212 S.W.3d 196 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 2007

We hold that the trial court correctly dismissed Brown’s common-law negligence claim because Brown’s exclusive remedy was under the Act and the circuit court therefore lacked jurisdiction to hear the claim. … Brown relies upon both Wooten v. Youthcraft Manufacturing Co., 312 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.1958), and Bass v. National Super Markets, Inc., 911 S.W.2d 617 (Mo. banc 1995).

Brown & Hamm v. Gummersell

30 Mo. App. 341 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1888

The court properly refused this instruction and in doing so followed the law as laid down in Wolff v. Vette, 17 Mo.