Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

1.34s

  • State v. Brown

    725 S.W.2d 622 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 27, 1987

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pope

    28 Mo. App. 379 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1887

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Houchin

    154 Mo. App. 261 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 1911

    BrOwn, was a dairyman and farmer, and his co-plaintiff, who is his brother, was employed in the insurance department of the state. … In the spring of 1906, plaintiffs, under the name of Brown Brothers, purchased a lot of unbroken horse's in Nebraska, and brought them to Jeffer,son City for re-sale.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    701 S.W.2d 476 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1985

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    825 S.W.2d 71 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1992

    Appellant, Gregory Brown, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    662 S.W.2d 294 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1983

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wellendorf

    820 S.W.2d 561 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Atkinson v. Brown

    68 Mo. App. 618 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1897

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    809 S.W.2d 744 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    810 S.W.2d 360 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    689 S.W.2d 63 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1985

    State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Mo. banc 1983). So defined, the evidence was as follows. Appellant was in the employ of the City of Kansas City and was engaged in the duties of head cashier in the water department. … State v. Mandina, 675 S.W.2d 113, 114 (Mo.App.1984). It is not necessary that the state’s proof exclude every hypothesis of innocence. State v. Brown, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chapman v. Brown

    192 Mo. App. 78 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1915

    Chapman v. M. M. … [Davidson v. Transit Co., 211 Mo. l. c. 359; Sotebier v. Railroad, 203 Mo. 702; Edwards v. Schreiber, 168 Mo. App. 197 ; Murphy v. Railroad, 168 Mo. App. 588 .]

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    797 S.W.2d 525 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1990

    ORDER PER CURIAM: The appellant Eric Brown was jury convicted of first degree tampering, § 569.080.1(2), and sentenced as a persistent offender. Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    795 S.W.2d 505 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 17, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    789 S.W.2d 158 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    759 S.W.2d 246 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 9, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    750 S.W.2d 669 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 3, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    750 S.W.2d 487 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wall

    186 Mo. App. 150 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1914

    If it appears, as in Hughes v. … [See Brouder v. Edmondson, 7 Ga. App. 843 ; Podalsky v. Ireland, 121 N. Y. Supp. 950 , 24 Cyc. 951.]

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    762 S.W.2d 470 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.