Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

0.29s

  • State v. Brown

    813 S.W.2d 90 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1991

    Defendant, Keith Brown, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of stealing over one hundred and fifty dollars. Defendant was sentenced as a persistent offender to fifteen years imprisonment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    900 S.W.2d 226 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 9, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    803 S.W.2d 197 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    750 S.W.2d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1988

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    829 S.W.2d 505 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1992

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    720 S.W.2d 6 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1986

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    232 S.W.3d 609 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2007

    Gregory Lamont Brown (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 1 motion for postconviction relief. … Tillman v. State, 939 S.W.2d 388, 389 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    696 S.W.2d 850 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1985

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    815 S.W.2d 84 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    879 S.W.2d 686 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    815 S.W.2d 67 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arseneau v. Brown

    654 S.W.2d 948 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1983

    Brown’s motion was taken with the case. We hold the probate division’s order is not appealable, but for different reasons than those asserted by Brown. … Board of Public Utilities v. Crow, 592 S.W.2d 285, 288 [3] (Mo.App.1979). Whether the law should be changed is not for us to decide. We realize our holding leaves the parties where we find them.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    738 S.W.2d 478 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1987

    Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion. The judgment has been affirmed, per curiam, pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    737 S.W.2d 219 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1987

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    805 S.W.2d 198 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Houchin

    154 Mo. App. 261 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 1911

    BrOwn, was a dairyman and farmer, and his co-plaintiff, who is his brother, was employed in the insurance department of the state. … In the spring of 1906, plaintiffs, under the name of Brown Brothers, purchased a lot of unbroken horse's in Nebraska, and brought them to Jeffer,son City for re-sale.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pope

    28 Mo. App. 379 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 1887

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    793 S.W.2d 445 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1990

    ORDER PER CURIAM: From a judgment of conviction on one count attempted robbery, first degree, § 564.011, RSMo 1986, and one count of robbery, first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, Brown was sentenced as a prior offender to

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    630 S.W.2d 215 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    775 S.W.2d 535 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1989

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.