Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

1.21s

  • State v. Brown

    668 S.W.2d 635 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1984

    Benson v. State, 504 S.W.2d 74, 76 (Mo.1974); State v. Simmons, 660 S.W.2d 319 (Mo.App.1983). … State v. Phroper, 619 S.W.2d 83, 90 (Mo.App.1981). Even under the scope of State v. Austin, 620 S.W.2d 42, 43 (Mo.App.1981) of the Eastern District the appellant’s point would be without merit. Unlike State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    964 S.W.2d 244 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1998

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McCormick

    23 Mo. App. 181 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1886

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harwood v. Brown

    23 Mo. App. 69 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1886

    Smith's Adm'rs v. Thomas, 29 Mo. 310 , 311 ; Henshaw v. Dutton, 59 Mo. 139 ; Jones v. Shaw, 67 Mo. 667 ; Ewing v. Clark, 76 Mo. 545 ; Gardner v. Matthews, 81 Mo. 627 . … Smith's Adm'rs v. Thomas, supra. According to the allegations of the answer, the original note was not owned by the deceased, R. B. Harwood, at the time of the execution of the notes in suit, he having assigned it to O.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Brown ex rel. Brown v. Hill

    192 S.W.3d 491 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2006

    Brown physical custody of their five-year-old daughter and awarding child support. For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    986 S.W.2d 508 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1999

    Dajuan Brown, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. King

    806 S.W.2d 436 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1991

    Edgewater Health Care, Inc. v. Health Systems Management, Inc., 752 S.W.2d 860, 868 (Mo.App.1988). … Phillips v. Lively, 708 S.W.2d 369, 373 (Mo.App.1986).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    530 S.W.2d 56 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1975

    In State v. … See also State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    940 S.W.2d 60 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    932 S.W.2d 917 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Castillo v. Brown

    918 S.W.2d 347 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996

    Brown for damages arising from an automobile collision at an intersection. The jury entered a verdict which assessed sixty percent of the fault to Mr. Castillo and forty percent of the fault to Ms. Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Riddle v. Brown

    37 Mo. App. 550 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1889

    Brown and the city of St. … the payment of certain judgments which the plaintiffs have recovered against Brown.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    643 S.W.2d 68 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1982

    See also, State v. Smith, 632 S.W.2d 3 (Mo.App.1982); State v. Byrnes, 619 S.W.2d 791 (Mo.App.1981). … The eyewitness testimony of the guard who observed Brown stabbing the victim contains more than enough evidence to support the finding of the prison disciplinary board that Brown was guilty of committing an institutional

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    926 S.W.2d 151 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1996

    Brown appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. Mr. … Brown contends that his guilty plea was entered unknowingly, un-intelligently and involuntarily because counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate whether the state had sufficient information to support a conviction

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    924 S.W.2d 311 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1996

    Brown’s, motion for Rule 24.035 relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion was timely filed after defendant was sentenced on guilty pleas on three charges: kidnapping, armed criminal action and forcible rape. … State v. Jennings, 649 S.W.2d 448, 455 (Mo.App.1983). Assuming, without deciding the rule confers the right to a pre-sentence investigation, the source of that right is not constitutional.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    923 S.W.2d 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    628 S.W.2d 722 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1982

    With respect to the denial of an evidentiary hearing, Brown’s claim that his plea was not voluntarily made is refuted by the record. Accordingly an evidentiary hearing is not required. Rule 27.26(e); Roebuck v. … Brager v. State, 625 S.W.2d 892 (1981).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    900 S.W.2d 10 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    897 S.W.2d 36 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1995

    ORDER PER CURIAM: Curtis Brown appeals his conviction of forcible rape. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    944 S.W.2d 590 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 13, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.