Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.21s
668 S.W.2d 635 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1984
Benson v. State, 504 S.W.2d 74, 76 (Mo.1974); State v. Simmons, 660 S.W.2d 319 (Mo.App.1983). … State v. Phroper, 619 S.W.2d 83, 90 (Mo.App.1981). Even under the scope of State v. Austin, 620 S.W.2d 42, 43 (Mo.App.1981) of the Eastern District the appellant’s point would be without merit. Unlike State v.
Cited 2 timesPublished23 Mo. App. 69 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1886
Smith's Adm'rs v. Thomas, 29 Mo. 310 , 311 ; Henshaw v. Dutton, 59 Mo. 139 ; Jones v. Shaw, 67 Mo. 667 ; Ewing v. Clark, 76 Mo. 545 ; Gardner v. Matthews, 81 Mo. 627 . … Smith's Adm'rs v. Thomas, supra. According to the allegations of the answer, the original note was not owned by the deceased, R. B. Harwood, at the time of the execution of the notes in suit, he having assigned it to O.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re Brown ex rel. Brown v. Hill
192 S.W.3d 491 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2006
Brown physical custody of their five-year-old daughter and awarding child support. For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Cited 0 timesPublished986 S.W.2d 508 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1999
Dajuan Brown, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing.
Cited 0 timesPublished806 S.W.2d 436 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1991
Edgewater Health Care, Inc. v. Health Systems Management, Inc., 752 S.W.2d 860, 868 (Mo.App.1988). … Phillips v. Lively, 708 S.W.2d 369, 373 (Mo.App.1986).
Cited 1 timesPublished530 S.W.2d 56 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1975
In State v. … See also State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished918 S.W.2d 347 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996
Brown for damages arising from an automobile collision at an intersection. The jury entered a verdict which assessed sixty percent of the fault to Mr. Castillo and forty percent of the fault to Ms. Brown.
Cited 0 timesPublished37 Mo. App. 550 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1889
Brown and the city of St. … the payment of certain judgments which the plaintiffs have recovered against Brown.
Cited 1 timesPublished643 S.W.2d 68 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 1982
See also, State v. Smith, 632 S.W.2d 3 (Mo.App.1982); State v. Byrnes, 619 S.W.2d 791 (Mo.App.1981). … The eyewitness testimony of the guard who observed Brown stabbing the victim contains more than enough evidence to support the finding of the prison disciplinary board that Brown was guilty of committing an institutional
Cited 1 timesPublished926 S.W.2d 151 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1996
Brown appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. Mr. … Brown contends that his guilty plea was entered unknowingly, un-intelligently and involuntarily because counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate whether the state had sufficient information to support a conviction
Cited 0 timesPublished924 S.W.2d 311 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1996
Brown’s, motion for Rule 24.035 relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion was timely filed after defendant was sentenced on guilty pleas on three charges: kidnapping, armed criminal action and forcible rape. … State v. Jennings, 649 S.W.2d 448, 455 (Mo.App.1983). Assuming, without deciding the rule confers the right to a pre-sentence investigation, the source of that right is not constitutional.
Cited 2 timesPublished628 S.W.2d 722 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1982
With respect to the denial of an evidentiary hearing, Brown’s claim that his plea was not voluntarily made is refuted by the record. Accordingly an evidentiary hearing is not required. Rule 27.26(e); Roebuck v. … Brager v. State, 625 S.W.2d 892 (1981).
Cited 1 timesPublished897 S.W.2d 36 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1995
ORDER PER CURIAM: Curtis Brown appeals his conviction of forcible rape. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.25(b)
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna