Case law

State v. Brown

741 S.W.2d 53 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1987

I, § 15; § 542.276.10(3); State v. Brown, 708 S.W.2d 140, 143 (Mo. banc 1986). … State v. Brown, 708 S.W.2d 140, 145 (Mo. banc 1986).

McCauley v. Brown

99 Mo. App. 625 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 1993

Christian v. Ins. Co., 143 Mo. 460 ; Carlin v. Haynes, 74 Mo. App. 34 ; Some instructions were rightly refused for plaintiff for the reason that the substance of them had been *629 embodied in those given for him. … At his request the court instructed that in determining whether defendant knew the real value of the stock, the jury could' consider the fact that he was, and had been for a long time, a member of the board of directors of

Brown v. State

43 S.W.3d 390 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 2001

Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

State v. Brown

188 Mo. App. 248 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1915

A board in the head of one of the barrels had been broken in transportation disclosing that its contents were packed *250 in straw. … In State v.

Brown v. State

28 S.W.3d 476 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 2000

Keith Brown appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

Epperson v. Brown

50 S.W.3d 906 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2001

Appellant Timothy Brown (“Father”) appeals the judgment and decree of adoption terminating his parental rights.

State v. Brown

51 S.W.3d 108 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 1, 2001

ORDER PER CURIAM: Harley Brown appeals his convictions of assault in the first degree and armed criminal action. For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Brown

44 S.W.3d 439 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 2001

ORDER Timothy Brown (“defendant”) appeals from the judgment on his conviction, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal nonsupport under section 568.040 RSMo 1994.

State v. Brown

901 S.W.2d 260 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 9, 1995

Brown v. Barr

12 S.W.3d 397 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 2000

Brian Brown (“Father”) appeals the judgment ordering him to pay Kristine Barr (“Mother”) $1,136 per month in child support, $5,068 for Mother’s birth expenses, and to submit to random drug testing in connection with his visitation

State v. Brown

784 S.W.2d 903 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1990

They rely on cases such as State v. Epperson, 571 S.W.2d 260 (Mo. banc 1978) and State v. Butler, 676 S.W.2d 809 (Mo. banc 1984). … See, Commonwealth v. Saia, 372 Mass. 53 , 360 N.E.2d 329 (1977); State v. Miller, 282 N.C. 633 , 194 S.E.2d 353 (1973); People v. Townes, 41 N.Y.2d 97 , 359 N.E.2d 402 , 390 N.Y.S.2d 893 (1976).

Martin v. Brown

162 Mo. App. 223 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1912

Brown, who died before service of summons was had upon him,- and thereafter revived on motion against Louisa L. … [Dawson v. Waldheim, 89 Mo. App. 245 , and cases cited.] It is insisted that the court had no sufficient data to authorize the amendment. We think otherwise.

Brown v. State

987 S.W.2d 522 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1999

Ivory Brown, Movant, appeals to this court challenging the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing.

State v. Brown

847 S.W.2d 79 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1992

State v. Johnson, 486 S.W.2d 491, 496 (Mo.1972). … State v. Twenter, 818 S.W.2d 628, 634 (Mo. banc 1991). Brown’s third point is denied. Judgment affirmed. All concur. . All statutory references are to RSMo 1986, unless otherwise specifically stated. .

State v. Brown

986 S.W.2d 520 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1999

Appellant, Charles Brown (“defendant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St.

Brown v. Kuziez

16 S.W.3d 747 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 2, 2000

Brown v. Mays

80 Mo. App. 81 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1899

State v. Nelson, 101 Mo. 477 ; Roberts v. Boulton, 56 Mo. App. 405 . Trial practice: sufficiency of evidence province of jury: misconduct. … The plaintiff maintains that there was no evidence tending to prove that Brown acted as the agent of the lumber company in negotiating the trade with defendant for the sale to him of the half interest in the four head of

State v. Brown

16 S.W.3d 678 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 2000

Kevin Brown, Defendant, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree assault of a law enforcement officer in violation of Section 565.081.1 RSMo. (1994), as to which he was sentenced

Brown v. Briggs

559 S.W.2d 768 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1977

Ellebracht v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc., 543 S.W.2d 503, 504 [2] (Mo.App.1976); Budg et-E asy, Incorporated v. Burd, 539 S.W.2d 740, 741 [2, 3] (Mo.App.1976); Phillips v. Frazier, 537 S.W.2d 251 (Mo.App.1976).

Harwood v. Brown

23 Mo. App. 69 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1886

Smith's Adm'rs v. Thomas, 29 Mo. 310 , 311 ; Henshaw v. Dutton, 59 Mo. 139 ; Jones v. Shaw, 67 Mo. 667 ; Ewing v. Clark, 76 Mo. 545 ; Gardner v. Matthews, 81 Mo. 627 . … Smith's Adm'rs v. Thomas, supra. According to the allegations of the answer, the original note was not owned by the deceased, R. B. Harwood, at the time of the execution of the notes in suit, he having assigned it to O.