Case law

State v. Brown

148 S.W.3d 848 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2004

Arlen Brown appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of methamphetamine. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.

Brown v. Wintsch

110 Mo. App. 264 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1904

Brown as man and wife before they were married and occupied the same room and boarded with her;” that they were living together in adultery and fornication. … In Christal v.

Propst v. Brown

854 S.W.2d 844 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1993

Brawley v. McNary, 811 S.W.2d 362 (Mo. banc 1991) [1]. Deference will be given to the trial court’s ability to judge the credibility of the witnesses. Id.; Rule 73.01(c)(2). … Brown v. Mercantile Bank of Poplar Bluff, 820 S.W.2d 327 (Mo.App.1991) [25-27]. Punitive damages are to be awarded for outrageous conduct, or for a party’s evil motive or reckless indifference to the rights of others.

Brown v. Brewington

513 S.W.2d 768 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1974

Brown, d/b/a Brown Meat Company, as garnishee. Brown was defendant’s employer at the time of the garnishment. Brown failed to withhold defendant’s wages as required by the garnishment. … Respondent cites Goforth v. Goforth, 301 S.W.2d 877 (Mo. App.1957), as authority for the proposition that an order granting the 90% exemption from garnishment is not an appealable order. Goforth v.

State v. Brown

683 S.W.2d 316 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 1984

Scott v. Scott, 612 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Mo.App.1981). Where it is impossible or impractical to present only facts to the jury, relevant matters are often presented by opinion. … See Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Woods, 663 S.W.2d 392, 399 (Mo. App.1983); 32 C.J.S. Evidence, § 444, p. 56. Such evidence is often a “matter of necessity or expediency”. 2 Jones on Evidence § 404, p. 752 (5th ed. 1958).

State v. Brown

145 S.W.3d 852 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 2004

Michael Brown appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County following a jury determination of guilt on charges of second degree robbery and felonious restraint.

State v. Brown

737 S.W.2d 496 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 1987

State v. Barber, 587 S.W.2d 325, 329 (Mo.App.1979); see also, State v. S.E., 675 S.W.2d 86, 87 (Mo.App.1984). It is not of legal consequence that title to the twelve dollars actually rested in another. … Brown is all that is necessary to meet the requirements of a charge of stealing.

State v. Brown

801 S.W.2d 474 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1990

State v. Brooks, supra. … In State v.

Brown v. Whitaker

926 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1996

As the court said in Pinkston v. … Dynacon Builders v. Janowitz, 892 S.W.2d 807, 809 (Mo.App.1995). See also Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 550 S.W.2d 780, 789 (Mo.1977).

Brown v. Campbell

240 Mo. App. 182 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1949

Bates v. Friedman (Mo. App.) 7 S.W.2d 452 . Dean v. K.C. St. L. and C.R. Co. 199 Mo. 386 , 97 S.W. 910 . Roman v. King (Mo. App.) 268 S.W. 414 . Wright v. Kansas City 187 Mo. 678 , 86 S.W. 452 . Caplin v. St. … In Rolleg v.

Brown v. Conway

598 S.W.2d 549 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1980

Thomas Brown, Willa’s brother-in-law and husband of Mary Brown, Bryan’s guardian, testified that he knew Charles Johns, Jr., since 1967 when he went to work *551 for General Motors. … In Wren v.

Brown v. Langhans

955 S.W.2d 789 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1997

State v. Brown

699 S.W.2d 512 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1985

Given the broad discretion to be exercised by the trial court in controlling the argument of counsel, State v. Stuckey, 680 S.W.2d 931, 937 (Mo. banc 1984), we find no error in the trial court’s ruling. State v. … State v. Mitchell, 622 S.W.2d 791, 796 [6] (Mo.App.1981) and State v. Stuckey, 680 S.W.2d at 937 [6]. We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended written opinion.

Overton v. Brown

63 Mo. App. 49 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1895

Brown v. Scruggs

141 Mo. App. 632 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1910

As said in Harper v. … And in Nevis v.

Brown v. State

72 S.W.3d 233 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2002

Thereafter, it was retransferred “for reconsideration in light of George Brown, Jr. v. State of Missouri, [ 66 S.W.3d 721 ] (No. … See Brown v. State, 19 S.W.3d 190 (Mo.App.2000). .

State v. Brown

577 S.W.2d 163 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1979

In the case of State v. Duren, 556 S.W.2d 11 (Mo. banc 1977), however, pursuant to a Writ of Certiorari, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that Art. … On question of jury selection in other states, see Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 , 95 S.Ct. 692 , 42 L.Ed.2d 690 (1975) tried prior to State v. Duren, supra.

State v. Brown

249 S.W.3d 260 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2008

Brown contends that the trial court plainly erred in not declaring a mistrial, sua sponte, after a witness testified to Brown’s use of racial slurs during his arrest and that the jury reached their verdict based on emotion … As the jury had already indicated during voir dire that it could be fair and impartial in light of evidence of Brown’s use of racial slurs, Brown’s claim is without merit.

Moon v. Brown

172 Mo. App. 516 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1913

It is not like tbe case of Eice v.. … [Cote Brick Co. v. Sadring, 68 Mo. App. 15 ; Norton Lumber Co. v. Driving Park Assn., 64 Mo. App. 377 .]

Brown v. Childress

41 S.W.3d 926 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 2001

Brown (“Appellant”) appeals the denial of his motion to modify a child support judgment. … STANDARD OF REVIEW The standard of review here is that set forth in Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976). Short v. Short, 947 S.W.2d 67, 69 (Mo.App.1997).