Case law

Brown v. State

574 S.W.2d 501 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1978

The direct appeal from the convictions was upheld by this court in State v. Brown, 525 S.W.2d 565 (Mo.App.1975) but the cause was remanded for resentence under the principle of State v. … State v. Brown, supra, 525 S.W.2d l.c. 567[3]. Whether the lapse constituted ineffective assistance of counsel remains another matter.

Brown v. State

387 S.W.3d 423 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2012

Movant, Brandon Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Brown v. Meyer

580 S.W.2d 533 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1979

Probst v. Seyer, 353 S.W.2d 798 [2] (Mo.1962). “Substantial evidence” is that which has probative force upon the issues and from which the jury can reasonably decide the case on the fact issues. Zeigenbein v. … Smith v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc., 524 S.W.2d 848 [2] (Mo. banc 1975). Defendant’s evidence contradictory or unfavorable to plaintiff’s contentions must be disregarded. Bateman v.

State v. Brown

950 S.W.2d 930 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1997

Defendant, Darryl Brown, appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for stealing a motor vehicle, Sec. 570.030, RSMo 1994 * , for which he was sentenced to two years imprisonment. We affirm. … State v. Williams, 784 S.W.2d 276, 281 (Mo.App.1989).

Prewitt v. Brown

101 Mo. App. 254 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1903

Everybody connected with this transaction, except Brown, was a member of the St. Louis Stock Exchange and knew its rules, and Drummond was on the governing board of the exchange. … Arnholt v. Hartwig, 73 Mo. 485 ; Dougherty v. Cooper, 77 Mo. 528 ; Shoe Co. v. Lisman, 149 Mo. 85 .

State v. Brown

489 S.W.3d 818 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2015

ORDER PER CURIAM Eddie Brown (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a *819 bench trial, finding him to be a prior and persistent felony offender and convicting him of first degree robbery, in violation

State v. Brown

958 S.W.2d 574 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1997

Brown failed to establish the requisite prejudice. When instructional error arises, prejudice is judicially determined by considering the facts and instructions together. State v. … Brown timely challenged the state’s use of a peremptory challenge as to the venireperson. Ms. Brown concedes the state’s reason for striking the venireperson was race-neutral. See, e.g., State v.

Brown v. Bennett

136 S.W.3d 552 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2004

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … Little v. Morris, 967 S.W.2d 685, 686 (Mo.App.1998).

Brown v. Kirkham

23 S.W.3d 880 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2000

Facts Joyce Elliott Brown brought an action against Kathleen Kirkham to set aside a conveyance of real property to Kirkham by *882 Brown’s aunt, Rose Wilma Elliott. Brown v. Kirkham, 926 S.W.2d 197, 198 (Mo.App. … See Brown I, 926 S.W.2d at 201 ; Smith v. Chatfield, 797 S.W.2d 508, 509 (Mo.App. W.D.1990); McMullin, 761 S.W.2d at 719 ; Hammons v. Eisert, 745 S.W.2d 253 (Mo.App. S.D.1988).

Sparks v. Brown

46 Mo. App. 529 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1891

Johnson v. Houston, 17 Mo. 58 ; Leitsendorfer v. Delphy, 15 Mo. 167 ; Miller v. Dunlap, 22 Mo. App. 97 ; Jones v. Shepley, 90 Mo. 307 ; Corrigan v. Tiernay, 100 Mo. 276 ; Hogel v. Lindell, 10 Mo. 493 ; Montaney v. … Zoll v. Carnahan, 83 Mo. 35 ; Stewart v. Thomas, 35 Mo. 202 ; Gutzweiler ’ s Adm’r v. Lackmann, 39 Mo. 91 ; Weinrich v.

Brown v. State

674 S.W.2d 578 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 29, 1984

His conviction was affirmed in State v. Brown, 404 S.W.2d 179 (Mo.1966), and a complete recitation of the facts is contained therein. … Brown v. State, 461 S.W.2d 743 (Mo.1971).

State v. Brown

171 Mo. 477 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 1903

[Griffin v. State, 4 Tex. App. 390.] The overshadowing question in this case is as to the existence of the relation of principal and agent, between the prosecuting witness Hardwick, and the defendant, J. L. Brown. … [Enterprise Soap Works v. Sayers, 55 Mo. App. 15 ; Chapman v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 542 .] In the first mentioned case, the contract of rescission was deduced from correspondence.

Brown v. State

388 S.W.3d 599 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2012

Courtney Brown (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

Brown v. Strimple

21 Mo. App. 338 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1886

Walsh v. Transportation Co., 52 Mo. 434 ; Coquard v. Bank of Kansas City, 12 Mo. App. 261 . The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. All the judges concur.

Brown v. Jones

735 S.W.2d 155 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1987

Knight v. Keaton, 660 S.W.2d 752, 753 (Mo.App.1983). … Hohenstreet v. Sterling National Land Co., 706 S.W.2d 80 (Mo.App.1986).

Bachman v. Brown

56 Mo. App. 396 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1894

Brown v. State

381 S.W.3d 404 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 2012

Brown appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. 1 We have reviewed the briefs

Stifel v. Brown

24 Mo. App. 102 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1887

The president of the board of public improvements complied with the above requirements of the ordinance in making this assessment. … Louis, but in other cities of this state for many years, and that this principle has been approved by the supreme court in numerous decisions (Farrar v. St.

State v. Brown

747 S.W.2d 261 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1988

State v. Jones, 515 S.W.2d 504, 506 [3] (Mo.1974); State v. Howard, 714 S.W.2d 736, 738 [2] (Mo.App.1986). In any event, the detective’s statement did not mandate a new trial. State v. … State v. Antwine, 743 S.W.2d 51, 66 (Mo. banc 1987). The finding of no discrimination by the trial court was a finding of fact.

Brown v. Mustion

884 S.W.2d 365 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1994

As a result, I signed three notes, one of which was payable to Elsie Brown. My wife signed it. … Fox v. Burton, 402 S.W.2d 329, 334 [1] (Mo.1966). To similar effect see Holt v.