Case law

Brown v. Carson

132 Mo. App. 371 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1908

Brown.” “June 12th, 1898, received on the within note one hundred dollars. “T. J. Brown.” … [Briscoe, Admr., v. Huff, 75 Mo. App. 288 ; Crow v. Crow, 124 Mo. App. 120 ; Phillips v. Mahan, 52 Mo. 197 ; Haver v. Schwyhart, 39 Mo. App. 303 ; 48 Mo. App. 50 ; Loewer v. Haug, 20 Mo. App. 163 ; Smith v.

State v. Brown

475 S.W.3d 704 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2015

ORDER PER CURIAM The defendant, Evrick Brown, appeals the judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St.

State v. Brown

633 S.W.2d 301 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1982

Brown v. State, 574 S.W.2d 501, 502 (Mo.App.1978). … Our Supreme Court has carved out a narrow exception to this rule in Flowers v. State, 618 S.W.2d 655 (Mo.1981).

State v. Brown

601 S.W.2d 311 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 6, 1980

In State v. … State v. Sturdivan, 497 S.W.2d 139,144 (Mo. 1973).

Brown v. State

397 S.W.3d 43 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 2013

Jerome Brown appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him to be a sexually violent predator, Section 632.480 et seq. RSMo Cum.Supp.2009. … Brown contends the trial court plainly erred in allowing testimony based on police investigations which did not result in convictions and erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal.

State v. Brown

446 S.W.2d 498 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1969

Constitution of Missouri, Article V, Section 3; City of Olivette v. Graeler, Mo.App., 329 S.W.2d 275 , transferred to 338 S.W.2d 827 ; City of St. Louis v. Butler Co., 358 Mo. 1221 , 219 S.W.2d 372 . … State v. Akers, Mo.App., 287 S.W.2d 370 . And it is likewise true that paternity is an element. State v. Williams, supra.

State v. Brown

996 S.W.2d 719 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1999

State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 699 (Mo. banc 1983). … V.

State v. Brown

698 S.W.2d 9 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 1985

State v. … Brown had purposefully given the young victim reason to trust and confide in her. The prosecutor’s question thus remained “within the fair purview of direct examination,” State v.

Brown v. Adams

715 S.W.2d 940 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1986

Fritschle v. Kettle River Co., 346 Mo. 196 , 139 S.W.2d 948, 949 (1940); Remmers v. Remmers, 217 Mo. 641 , 117 S.W. 1117, 1123 (1909); Bremson v. Kinder-Care Learning Center, Inc., 651 S.W.2d 159 (Mo.App.1983). … Johnson v. Haskins, 119 S.W.2d 235 (Mo.1938); Fischer v. Vonck, 614 S.W.2d 26 (Mo.App.1981); 7A C.J.S. Attorney and Client § 269 (1980).

Engle v. Brown

202 Mo. App. 345 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1919

We think that the agreement whereby the defendants were released and Lobdell accepted in their place on the note would be sufficient to show a novation (Brown v. Kirk, 20 Mo. App. 524 ; Garrison v. O’Donald, 73 Mo. … [Baldwin v. Daly, 41 Wash. 416 ; Pitt v. Little, 58 Wash, 355, 358; Leask v. Dew, 92 N. Y. Suppl. 891.]

Brown v. State

397 S.W.3d 52 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 2013

ORDER PER CURIAM: Jawanza Brown appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

Othenin v. Brown

66 Mo. App. 318 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1896

Brown and Margaret A. … It was held in Oster v. Rabeneau, 46 Mo. 595 , and in DeWitt v. Smith, 63 Mo. 263 , that mere excess in the quantity of the property sought to be charged therein does not vitiate the lien account.

Thompson v. Brown

50 Mo. App. 314 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 30, 1892

Ring v. Jameson, 2 Mo. App. 584 ; s. c., 66 Mo. 428 ; Harrison v. Hall, 8 Mo. App. 167 ; Loeffel v. Hors, 11 Mo. App. 133 ; Raglan v. Steamboat, 40 Mo. 244 ; Vito Viti v. Dixon, 12 Mo. 315 ; Fulton Iron Works v. … Harrison v. Hall, supra; Hall’s Ex’r Case, 48 Pa. St. 24.

State v. Brown

542 S.W.2d 789 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1976

Alexander v. United States, 354 F.2d 59, 63 [5] (5th Cir. 1965); Hendrix v. United States, 327 F.2d 971, 974 [4] (5th Cir. 1964). … State v. Linzia, 412 S.W.2d 116, 120 [5] (Mo.1967); McMahon v. May Department Stores Company, 374 S.W.2d 82, 88 [4] (Mo.1963); State v. Blackmore, 327 Mo. 708, 715 , 38 S.W.2d 32, 34 [2] (1931); State v.

Brown v. State

395 S.W.3d 83 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2013

The movant, Deraughn Brown, appeals the motion court’s order denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing.

State v. Brown

762 S.W.2d 471 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1988

One of the men, the appellant, Wonel Brown, approached Officer Ackerman. Officer Ackerman asked the appellant for some identification. … State v. Fain, 679 S.W.2d 419, 422-23 [1] (Mo.App.1984). In State v.

Brown v. Meyer

580 S.W.2d 533 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1979

Probst v. Seyer, 353 S.W.2d 798 [2] (Mo.1962). “Substantial evidence” is that which has probative force upon the issues and from which the jury can reasonably decide the case on the fact issues. Zeigenbein v. … Smith v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc., 524 S.W.2d 848 [2] (Mo. banc 1975). Defendant’s evidence contradictory or unfavorable to plaintiff’s contentions must be disregarded. Bateman v.

State v. Brown

814 S.W.2d 304 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1991

State v. Stolzman, 799 S.W.2d 927, 936 (Mo.App.1990). … See also Pennsylvania v. Bruder, 488 U.S. 9, 10 , 109 S.Ct. 205, 206 , 102 L.Ed.2d 172 (1988); State v. Pena, 784 S.W.2d at 885 ; State v. Neal, 682 S.W.2d 860 (Mo.App.1984).

Brown v. State

387 S.W.3d 423 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2012

Movant, Brandon Brown, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

State v. Brown

399 S.W.3d 497 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 2013

Jimmie Lee Brown appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of driving while intoxicated. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).