Case law

Arnold Shute v. Board of Zoning Adjustments of Franklin County, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2025

In Point V, he claims he had no duty to preserve his arguments because the Board’s hearing was a noncontested case under Chapter 536. … In Point V, Shute argues he need not preserve his arguments because the Board’s hearing was a noncontested case.

State ex rel. Koster v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners

532 S.W.3d 191 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 2017

Shelton v. Koster, 360 S.W.3d 805, 809 (Mo. App. … The Board’s reliance on State ex rel. Barrett v. Boeckeler Lumber Co., 302 Mo. 187 , 257 S.W. 453 (Mo. banc 1924), is misplaced.

Cousin's Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City

78 S.W.3d 774 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2002

Manes v. Depew, 987 S.W.2d 527, 529 (Mo.App.1999). … Louis County v.

Spencer v. Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners

388 S.W.3d 540 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 2012

They sued the Board for violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act, ch. 213, RSMo, and for breach of contract. … See Spencer v. Zobrist, 323 S.W.3d 391 (Mo.App. W.D.2010); Schnell v. Zobrist, 323 S.W.3d 403 (Mo.App. W.D.2010). The Circuit Court of Daviess County granted summary judgment to the Board. Spencer and Schnell appeal.

ND-Sell, Inc. v. Greater Springfield Board of Realtors, Inc.

224 S.W.3d 623 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 2007

Ortmann v. Dace Homes, Inc., 86 S.W.3d 86, 88 (Mo.App. E.D.2002). The trial court’s interpretation of the contract, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. Helterbrand v. … Martin v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 996 S.W.2d 506, 511 (Mo. banc 1999).

Perez v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

803 S.W.2d 160 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1991

State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Masters, 512 S.W.2d 150, 159 (Mo. App.1974). … State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Masters, 512 S.W.2d at 157-58 . Dr.

Willis v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis

307 S.W.3d 186 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2010

Louis Public Schools, appeals the trial court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Board of Education of the City of St. Louis to terminate her employment for violating Board Regulations.

Howes v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.

223 Mo. App. 793 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1930

Brown (Ky), 3 S.W.2d 199 , it appeared that Brown was employed at the mines of the coal company, which, for the convenience of itself and its employees, maintained roads through its property. … While walking home from his work Brown stumbled on a stone in one of these roads, and was thereby injured.

Byous v. Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement System Board of Trustees

157 S.W.3d 740 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2005

We do not substitute our judgment for that of the Board; we instead ascertain whether the Board could “reasonably have made its findings and reached its decision on the basis of all the evidence before it.” Hay v. … N.H.Rev.Stat. § 281:2, V-a (2008).

Durley v. BOARD OF POLICE COM'RS, CITY OF ST. LOUIS

238 S.W.3d 685 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 2007

Dhyne v. State Farm, Fire & Cas. … an official policy or a custom of the municipality. 5 Williams, 841 S.W.2d at 196 (applying municipal liability analysis to Board of Police Commissioners); Ware v.

Miller v. Browning-Ferris Industries

674 S.W.2d 150 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 29, 1984

On May 17, 1982, respondents Browning-Ferris Industries of Kansas City, Inc. (hereinafter Browning-Ferris), Frank Douglas, and Riverview Land Association, Inc. … Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Bank of St. Ann, 631 S.W.2d 73 (Mo.App.1982), State ex rel. Steak n Shake, Inc. v. City of Richmond Heights, 560 S.W.2d 373 (Mo.App.1977), and Williams v.

Gould v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

826 S.W.2d 101 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1992

In Count IV, plaintiff sought money damages from a second defendant, an investigator employed by the State Board. The State Board withdrew the subpoena and filed a motion to dismiss all counts against the State Board. … Wilson, 791 S.W.2d at 500 ; Bay’s Texaco Service and Supply Company, Inc. v. Mayfield, 792 S.W.2d 50, 51 (Mo.App.1990); Rule 74.01(b).

Robinson v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Board of Probation & Parole

805 S.W.2d 688 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1991

In Thummel v. … Claimant relies on Ross v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 738 S.W.2d 611 (Mo.App.1987).

BT Residential, LLC v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City

392 S.W.3d 18 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2012

Reiz v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 316 S.W.3d 331, 334 (Mo.App. W.D.2010). … Bird v.

Gilroy-Sims & Associates v. City of St. Louis

697 S.W.2d 567 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1985

Grogan v. Hays, 639 S.W.2d 875, 877 (Mo.App.1982). … Brown v. Morris, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 160 (Mo.banc 1956); 42 Am.Jur.2d Initiative and Referendum § 55 (1969).

Bank of Jacomo v. Fox

82 S.W.3d 224 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2002

Claudia Lee & Associates v. Kansas City, Missouri Board of Zoning Adjustment

489 S.W.3d 802 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2016

State at Relation of Noland Road Raceways, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 145 S.W.3d 455, 456 (Mo. … In Bucker v.

Carraway v. Sayad

717 S.W.2d 280 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1986

Moran v. Whaley, 608 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Mo.App.1980). The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the decision of the Board. Miller v. Whaley, 581 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Mo.App.1979). … Neither this court nor the Circuit Court may substitute its judgment for that of the administrative board. McNeal v. Bequette, 571 S.W.2d 657, 658 (Mo.App.1978).

Phillips v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Bellefontaine Neighbors

308 S.W.2d 765 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1958

Brown v. Gambrel, 358 Mo. 192 , 213 S.W.2d 931 ; Veal v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., 249 S.W.2d 491 ; Cunningham v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., . 276 S.W.2d 633 ; Berard v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. … The Board of Adjustment has no authority to repeal an ordinance. It is an administrative body without a vestige of legislative authority. State ex rel. Nigro v. Kansas City, 325 Mo. 95 , 27 S.W.2d 1030 ; Wilson v.

Bittner v. City of St. Louis Police Board of Commissioners

925 S.W.2d 495 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1996

Further, in Peoples v. … Plummer v. Dace, 818 S.W.2d 317, 319 (Mo.App.1991).