Case law

Love v. St. Louis City Board of Education

963 S.W.2d 364 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1998

Vollman v. Rosenburg, 950 S.W.2d 914, 915 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). In Count X, Love attempted to allege claims for abuse of process and malicious prosecution against respondents, St. Louis City Board of Education and others. … Albright v. Kelley, 926 S.W.2d 207, 209 (Mo.App. S.D.1996). Generally, an appealable judgment must dispose of all issues and all parties. Taylor v. Henderson, 924 S.W.2d 28, 29 (Mo.App. S.D.1996).

Andrew Bernhardt v. Nancy McCarthy for Board of Probation and Parole

467 S.W.3d 348 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 12, 2015

Underwood v. Dir. of Mo. … State v. Pierce, 433 S.W.3d 424, 429 (Mo. banc 2014) (quoting State v. Fassero, 256 S.W.3d 109, 117 (Mo. banc 2008)); see also, e.g., Mayes v. St.

Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis v. Daly

129 S.W.3d 405 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 2004

Perry State Bank v. Farmers Alliance, 953 S.W.2d 155, 157 (Mo.App. W.D.1997). … City of Kansas City v. Baker, 793 S.W.2d 646, 648 (Mo.App.

Contracting Plumbers' Ass'n of St. Louis v. Board of Education

238 Mo. App. 1096 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 1946

In Home Building and Conveyance Co. v. … In Cooper v.

Angelos v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

90 S.W.3d 189 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2002

The licensee may waive the Board hearing, in which case the Commission’s recommendation is the disciplinary order. The final decision of the Commission and Board is then subject to judicial review. Bodenhausen v. … Kraus v. Director of Revenue, 935 S.W.2d 71, 73 (Mo.App.1996); see also Ferrarlo v.

Allen v. Green Ridge R-VIII School Dist.

892 S.W.2d 635 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1994

At this meeting, Brown informed Allen that the school board had decided to reassign Allen permanently to Sedalia. … See Chilton v.

Basye v. Fayette R-III School District Board of Education

150 S.W.3d 111 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 2004

They also alleged that the Fayette R-III School District Board of Education also claims an interest in the Union School lot “for school purposes” and that the lot ceased being used “for school purposes” when public school … Although the Supreme Court held in Powell v. Powell, 267 Mo. 117 , 183 S.W. 625, 628 (1916), and later in Kline v.

State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Vandivort

23 S.W.3d 725 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 30, 2000

Enforcement of subpoenas, therefore, must come through the courts, because the General Assembly did not authorize the board to enforce them. See Brooks v. … The board possesses no inherent power to issue subpoenas and may do so only as authorized by statute. See Brooks v.

Merideth v. Board of Education of Rockwood R-6 School District

513 S.W.2d 740 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1974

In addition, the evidence must be considered in a light most favorable to the board’s decision, together with all reasonable inferences which support it. Harrod v. Board of Education, City of St. … Hanebrink v. Parker, supra, p. 458.

Rachel K. Williston v. Missouri State Board of Nursing

Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2020

We find similarly misplaced Williston’s reliance on Leggett v. Tennessee Board of Nursing, 612 S.W.2d 476 (Tenn. Ct. … See Albanna v.

DALE BY AND THROUGH DALE v. Edmonds

819 S.W.2d 388 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1991

Co. v. Brown, 809 S.W.2d 144, 145 (Mo.App.1991). … Brown v. St. Louis County, 792 S.W.2d 398, 401 (Mo.App.1990). In its order, the trial court found that the second element could not be proved.

Wilson v. Douglas

297 S.W.2d 588 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1957

Nigro v. Kansas City, 325 Mo. 95 , 27 S.W.2d 1030 . Other similar cases are Adams v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, Mo.App., 241 S.W.2d 35 , and Berard v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, Mo.App., 138 S.W.2d 731 . … Nigro v. Kansas City, supra, 27 S.W.2d 1032 .

Dawn Renee Furman v. Board of Nursing Home Administrators

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2020

Id. at 729, 730; see also, e.g., Brown v. State Bd. of Accountancy, 588 S.W.3d 519, 526 (Mo. App. … The Court continued by observing: Nothing in Boyd v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 916 S.W.2d 311 (Mo. App. 1995), [or] Gard v.

Perkins v. Caldwell

363 S.W.3d 149 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 2012

Brown v. City of O’Fallon, 728 S.W.2d 595, 596 (Mo.App. E.D.1987); State ex rel Powell v. Wallace, 718 S.W.2d 545, 547 (Mo.App. E.D.1986). … Brown, 728 S.W.2d at 596 ; Jones v. State Dept. of Public Health and Welfare, 854 S.W.2d 37, 40 (Mo.App.1962).

Civilian Personnel Division v. Board of Police Commissioners

914 S.W.2d 23 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1995

In State v. Missouri Pac. R. … This argument boils down to a contention that if a person is physically able to perform a task the Board could look no further in determining fitness. That argument was rejected in St. Louis Police Officers’ Ass’n v.

Librach v. Cooper

778 S.W.2d 351 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1989

No mention was made about records, the Board notes. To the Board, this omission is consistent with the decisions of this Court in Wilson v. McNeal, 575 S.W.2d 802 (Mo.App.1978) and Brown v. … The concealment of these terms and conditions is not justified by either of the two policy concerns noted by the Board. Moreover, the Board’s reliance on Wilson v. McNeal and Brown v. Weir is misplaced.

Fowler v. Board of Regents for the Central Missouri State University

637 S.W.2d 352 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1982

Spearman v. … Allen v. Barker, 581 S.W.2d 818 (Mo. banc 1979); Allen v. Salina Broadcasting, Inc., 630 S.W.2d 225 (Mo.App.1982); Johnson v. Carthell, 631 S.W.2d 923 (Mo.App.1982).

State ex rel. Vernon County Reorganized School District No. I v. Brown

313 S.W.2d 774 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 5, 1958

On August 30, 1956, in a case entitled Walker Reorganized School District R-4 v. Flint and Vernon County Board of Education, and Vernon County Reorganized District No. … The cases of Adams v. Adams, 350 Mo. 152 , 165 S.W.2d 676 , Wilcox v. Phillips, 260 Mo. 664 , 169 S.W. 55 , and Sheppard v. Wagner, 240 Mo. 409, 442 , 145 S.W. 420 , relied upon by respondent, do not aid him.

Dart Truck Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

299 S.W.2d 881 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1957

Defendant did not appeal. *883 Plaintiff contends that the circuit court “erred in failing to reverse outright the Board of Zoning Adjustment rather than merely modifying the Board’s order.” … Horn v. Randall, Mo.App., 275 S.W.2d 758 , a reviewing court may not decide the cause de novo. It is so ordered. All concur.

Arnold Shute v. Board of Zoning Adjustments of Franklin County, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2025

In Point V, he claims he had no duty to preserve his arguments because the Board’s hearing was a noncontested case under Chapter 536. … In Point V, Shute argues he need not preserve his arguments because the Board’s hearing was a noncontested case.