Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.54s
City of Joplin v. Missouri State Board of Mediation
615 S.W.2d 613 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1981
We review the decision of the board, not the judgment of the trial court. Wilhite v. Hurd, 411 S.W.2d 72, 76 [1] (Mo.1967); Lester E. Cox Med. Ctr. v. L. & I. Rel. Com’ll, 606 S.W.2d 427, 432 (Mo.App.1980); Ingram v. … Shrock v. Wolfe Auto Sales, Inc., 358 S.W.2d 812, 815 (Mo.1962). In all other respects the appeal is clearly controlled by City of Columbia v. Mo.
Cited 1 timesPublished749 S.W.2d 420 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1988
Defendant relies primarily on Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). We believe Brown supports the result we have reached. … See State v. Rivers, 663 S.W.2d 255 (Mo.App.1983); State v. Gobble, 675 S.W.2d 944 (Mo.App.1984); State v. Souders, 703 S.W.2d 909 (Mo.App.1985).
Overruled by Peiffer v. State, 2002 Mo. LEXIS 94 (2002)Cited 5 timesPublished108 Mo. App. 518 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1904
This-definition of duplicity in an indictment is approvingly citedMn State v. Fox, 148 Mo. 1 . c. 525. In State v. Healy, 50 Mo. … State v. Kennedy, 63 Iowa 200 , 18 N. W. 885 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedHanlon v. Board of Education of the Parkway School District
695 S.W.2d 930 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1985
Rafael v. Meramec Valley R-III Board of Education, 569 S.W.2d 309 (Mo.App.1978). … Determination of credibility of the witnesses is a function of the Board. Merideth v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBoard of Education of St. Louis v. Daly
175 S.W.3d 638 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2005
See McNally v. St. … The Board and Central Parking claim on appeal that the standard of review here is governed by Murphy v. Carron because the case was submitted on disputed facts.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Knight
379 S.W.3d 208 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 2012
ORDER PER CURIAM: The State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts appeals the Administrative Hearing Commission’s decision in favor of James W. Knight, M.D., in the Board’s disciplinary action against him. … The Board appeals, contending that the Commission was guilty of reversible error in excluding the testimony of its expert witnesses. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPollard v. Board of Education Reorganized School District No. III
533 S.W.2d 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1976
Blue Springs Reorganized School District IV v. Landuyt, 499 S.W.2d 33 (Mo.App.1973). … Blue Springs Reorganized School District IV v. Landuyt, supra.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMcCormack v. Maplewood-Richmond Heights School District Board of Education
935 S.W.2d 703 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1996
See, Elrod, 706 S.W.2d at 470; Williams v. Board of Ed., Cass R-VIII Sch. Dist., 573 S.W.2d 81, 85 (Mo.App.1978). See also, Smith v. Dora R-III School Dist., 682 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Mo.App.1984). … Missouri State Bd. of Educ., 918 S.W.2d 887, 891 (Mo.App.1995) (quoting Selby v. North Callaway Board of Education, 777 S.W.2d 275, 276 (Mo.App.1989) (in turn quoting Lopez v. Vance, 509 S.W.2d 197, 202 (Mo.App.1974))).
Cited 9 timesPublishedBoard of Educ. of City of St. Louis v. Daly
272 S.W.3d 228 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2008
Louis County v. … Louis County v. Dunne, 421 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Mo.banc 1967) and Kostman v. Pine Lawn Bank & Trust Co., 540 S.W.2d 72, 78 (Mo.banc 1976).
Cited 4 timesPublishedFrancois v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
880 S.W.2d 601 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1994
State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (Board), appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis reversing the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) denying Dr. … U.S. v. Francois, No. S1-86-292CR(4) (E.D.Mo. March 24, 1988).
Cited 4 timesPublishedHadel v. Board of Education of School District of Springfield
990 S.W.2d 107 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1999
In Larson v. … See State Dept, of Labor v. Board of Public Utils., 910 S.W.2d 737, 740 (Mo.App.1995).
Cited 6 timesPublished138 Mo. App. 64 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 1909
[Bank v. Porter, 148 Mo. 176 ; Mirrielees v. Railway, 163 Mo. 470 .] … [Richardson v. Brick Co., 122 Mo. App. 529 ; McCarty v. Transit Co., 192 Mo. 396 ; Young v. Ruhwedel, 119 Mo. App. 231 ; Herndon v. Lewis, 175 Mo. 116 .]
Cited 6 timesPublishedGard v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
747 S.W.2d 726 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 22, 1988
Co. v. Missouri State Highway Com’n, 454 S.W.2d 44, 48 [1] (Mo.1970); see also, G_ M_ H_ v. J_ L_ H_, 700 S.W.2d 506 (Mo.App.1985); Wray v. Schwitzer Co., 615 S.W.2d 646 (Mo.App.1981); and State v. … The Board says that appellant’s reliance on State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPalmer v. Van Buren R-1 Board of Education
872 S.W.2d 590 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1994
This court’s review is directed to the findings and decision of the school board, an administrative agency, not the judgment of the trial court. City of Cabool v. … [Harrisburg R-VIII School Dist. v. O’Brian, 540 S.W.2d 945, 950 (Mo.App.1976) ]. See also, Mo-Kan Airport Passenger Service, Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished15 Mo. App. 412 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1884
, who was confirmed by the president of the board of public improvements. … The State ex rel. v. Smith, 5 Mo. App. 427 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedHuff v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Independence
695 S.W.2d 166 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1985
Stockwell v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 434 S.W.2d 785, 789 (Mo.App.1968); and Wolfner v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Frontenac, 672 S.W.2d 147, 150 (Mo.App.1984). … Nigro v. Kansas City, supra, 27 S.W.2d at 1032 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedSt. Louis Police Officers' Ass'n v. Board of Police Commissioners
846 S.W.2d 732 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1992
Whether a contract entered into by the 1988 Board can bind future Boards is the question examined presently. 3 In Aslin v. … The trial court stated that Board’s interpretation completely ignores the language “shall henceforth pay.” In Jim Carlson Const., Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSchool District of Kansas City v. Missouri Board of Fund Commissioners
384 S.W.3d 238 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2012
(quoting Brown, v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955)). … See Board of Educ. of Oklahoma City Public Schools, Independent School Dist. No. 89, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedCantrell v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
26 S.W.3d 824 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2000
If the board exceeded its jurisdiction to assess the discipline and if the board exceeded and violated its statutory authority, its acts are void ab initio. Cohen v. … State of Missouri, ex rel Marler v. State Board of Optometry, 898 S.W.2d 559, 563 (Mo.App.1994).
Cited 6 timesPublishedLichtor v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
884 S.W.2d 49 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1994
Lederer v. … Brown, Inc. v. Weber Implement & Auto Co., 260 S.W.2d 751, 755 [3] (Mo.1953). Lichtor failed to allege any statement made by Ketcherside to him on which he relied.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna