Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

2.02s

  • Helton v. Missouri State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

    919 S.W.2d 560 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1996

    Helton and Hope Funeral Home, Inc. appeal a judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County affirming decisions of the Administrative Hearing Commission and the Missouri State Board of Embalmers finding cause to discipline the … The court, having carefully considered the arguments of appellants, concludes that the trial court did not err in affirming the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission and the disciplinary order of the Board of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BOARD OF REGENTS OF SOUTHWEST MO. STATE UNIVERSITY v. Harriman

    792 S.W.2d 388 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1990

    The several educational institutions ... are under the control and management of a Board of Curators or of a Board of Regents_ Mo.R.S.A. §§ 10753, 10760; Head v. Curators of the University of Mo., 47 Mo. 220, 224 . … Board of Regents v. Palmer, 356 Mo. 946, 951 , 204 S.W.2d 291, 294 (1947). See also Todd v. Curators of University of Missouri, 347 Mo. 460, 465 , 147 S.W.2d 1063, 1065 (1941); State ex rel. Bd. of Regents v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Cade v. State, Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services

    41 S.W.3d 31 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2001

    In support, he cites us to Brown Group, Inc. v. Admin. Hearing Comm’n, 649 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. banc 1983); State ex rel. Rogers v. Bd. of Police Comm'rs of Kansas City, 995 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.App. W.D.1999); and Jackson v. … In Jackson , this Court held that the School Board improperly delegated its authority to a three-member committee of the Board to hold Board hearings, such as teacher termination hearings.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Seidl v. Jefferson County Board of Education

    548 S.W.2d 853 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1977

    Co. v. Day, 349 Mo. 1139 , 164 S.W.2d 273 (Mo.1942); Joplin Waterworks Co. v. Jasper Co., 327 Mo. 964 , 38 S.W.2d 1068 (1931); State ex rel. Donnell v. Searcy, 347 Mo. 1052 , 152 S.W.2d 8 (1941); Preisler v. … Rock Road Frontage v. Davis, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dennis Ex Rel. Dennis v. St. Louis Board of Education

    809 S.W.2d 20 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1991

    Strickner v. Brown, 491 S.W.2d 253 , 255 *22 (Mo.1973). Defendants’ first point is denied. … In Jones v. St.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Wooldridge v. Greene County

    198 S.W.3d 676 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 23, 2006

    Hagely v. Board of Educ. of Webster Groves School Dist., 841 S.W.2d 663, 669 (Mo. banc 1992). To be timely, a petition for review of a uncontested case need only be filed within a reasonable time. State ex rel. … Board of Educ., 841 S.W.2d 663, 668-69 (Mo. banc 1992); Housing Authority of St. Louis County v. Lovejoy, 762 S.W.2d 843, 844-45 (Mo.App.1988).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Siu v. State Board Registration for the Healing Arts

    929 S.W.2d 324 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1996

    The State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts revoked his license for seven years with permission to be considered for reinstatement at the end of two years if he successfully completed treatment at the Tal-bott-Marsh

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bonner v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    167 S.W.3d 293 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 2005

    The judgment on appeal concerns action by the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (“Board”) against William R. Bonner, D.O. (“Dr. Bonner”). … Chastain v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Moore

    536 S.W.2d 926 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 3, 1976

    See State v. Walker, 365 S.W.2d 597 (Mo.1963); State v. Schrum, 347 Mo. 1060 , 152 S.W.2d 17 (1941); State v. Whitaker, 275 S.W.2d 322 (Mo.1955); State v. De Witt, 191 Mo. 51 , 90 S.W. 77 (1905); State v. … A statement of defendant Brown was read in evidence in which he indicated: that he, defendant Moore, and James Adams had traveled from Kansas City to Columbia in the Cadillac which was owned by a cousin of defendant Brown

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Managers of Sophian Plaza Ass'n v. Pickett

    897 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Cook v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

    884 S.W.2d 354 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Day v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

    831 S.W.2d 631 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1991

    ORDER PER CURIAM: Appeal from judgment affirming an order of the Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Kansas City. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lake Timberline Board of Trustees, Inc. v. Brawley

    206 S.W.3d 397 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2006

    Murphy v. Carron, 586 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rednam v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    316 S.W.3d 357 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2010

    Three months after Krishnarao V. … The Board appeals. On appeal from the circuit court’s review of an agency’s decision, we review the agency’s actions and not those of the circuit court. Albanna v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • DiMaggio v. Storz

    710 S.W.2d 402 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1986

    Sanders v. De-Loire Corp., 634 S.W.2d 225, 227 (Mo.App.1982). … In Roots v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Moheet v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    154 S.W.3d 393 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2005

    State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts v. McDonagh, 123 S.W.3d 146, 152 (Mo. banc 2003). For purposes of review, the Commission’s action and the Board’s order are “treated as one decision.” Dorman v. … He testified: [V]ital signs are vital.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Barnes v. Missouri Guarantee Savings & Building Ass'n

    83 Mo. App. 466 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1900

    Brown v. Archer, 62 Mo. App. 277 . But in order to come under this protection of the statute the loan must be made as provided by the statute (R. S. 1889, sec. 2812); that is, by open competitive bids, lb. 2. … We can not distinguish this case, in effect, from those of Moore v. B. & L. Ass’n, 74 Mo. App. 468 , and Price v. Empire Loan Ass’n, 75 Mo. App. 551 ; and on the authority of those cases, together with Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Gibson v. Missouri Board of Chiropractic Examiners

    365 S.W.2d 773 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1963

    Missildine Co. v. Jewett Market Company, 209 Iowa 567 , 228 N.W. 288 (aspirin) ; State v. Baker, 229 N.C. 73 , 48 S.E.2d 61 (tonics and laxatives) ; State v. … Bresee, 137 Iowa 673 , 114 N.W. 45 (tissue food); Board of Pharmacy of State of New Jersey v. Hutchin, 10 N.J.Misc. 641, 160 A. 214 (essence of peppermint and sweet spirits of niter) ; People v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tate v. Board of Education St. Louis City

    144 S.W.3d 349 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 2004

    McCuin Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App. E.D.1999). The Division has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, contending we have no jurisdiction. Claimant has not filed a response. … Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). *350 The Division’s motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and GLENN A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Casey v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    830 S.W.2d 478 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1992

    The Board can promulgate rules and regulations only to the extent of and within the delegated authority of the legislative grant. Missouri Hospital Association v. … O’Flaherty v. State Tax Commission of Missouri, 680 S.W.2d 153 , (Mo. banc 1984) [2].

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.