Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoctapp

10,000+ results

1.65s

  • KAYLA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MISSOURI STATE BOARD OF NURSING

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 2024

    BG Olive & Graeser, LLC v. … Reg’l Convention v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BOARD OF REGENTS OF SOUTHWEST MO. STATE UNIVERSITY v. Harriman

    792 S.W.2d 388 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1990

    The several educational institutions ... are under the control and management of a Board of Curators or of a Board of Regents_ Mo.R.S.A. §§ 10753, 10760; Head v. Curators of the University of Mo., 47 Mo. 220, 224 . … Board of Regents v. Palmer, 356 Mo. 946, 951 , 204 S.W.2d 291, 294 (1947). See also Todd v. Curators of University of Missouri, 347 Mo. 460, 465 , 147 S.W.2d 1063, 1065 (1941); State ex rel. Bd. of Regents v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Warren

    820 S.W.2d 564 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1991

    On August 10, 1989 the appellant, State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (Board), filed an administrative complaint before the AHC charging Dr. … The administrative complaint was filed by the Board 18 days before on August 10, 1989.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Hogan v. BD. OF POLICE COM'RS OF KAN. CITY

    337 S.W.3d 124 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2011

    After Hogan’s medical file was sent to the medical board of the Retirement Board, Dr. Harry Brown, a licensed psychologist with the medical board, examined Hogan and reviewed his medical file. Dr. … Riddell v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bittiker v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    404 S.W.2d 402 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1966

    Gaddy v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, Mo., 394 S.W.2d 284 . … Rush v. Swift & Co., Mo.App., 268 S.W.2d 589 ; Widens v. Personnel Board of Kansas City, Mo.App., 277 S.W.2d 665 ; Carroll Const. Co. v. Kansas City, Mo.App., 278 S.W.2d 817 ; Brown v. Anthony Mfg.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Sprenger v. Missouri Department of Public Safety

    340 S.W.3d 109 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 2011

    On remand, the Board heard evidence and made the following finding, in pertinent part: Attorney Roger Brown testified on behalf of Mr. … While questions of law are subject to de novo review, we defer to the Board’s fact-finding and credibility determinations. Dishman v. Joseph, 14 S.W.3d 709, 715 (Mo.App. W.D.2000); Sprenger, 248 S.W.3d at 628 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Siu v. State Board Registration for the Healing Arts

    929 S.W.2d 324 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1996

    The State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts revoked his license for seven years with permission to be considered for reinstatement at the end of two years if he successfully completed treatment at the Tal-bott-Marsh

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zipper v. Health Midwest

    978 S.W.2d 398 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1998

    Brown filed affidavits averring that they acted only in their capacity as Board members of MCI when participating in MCI’s consideration and ultimate revocation of Dr. Zipper’s medical staff privileges. Dr. Kuhn and Mr. … Brown averred that they did not discuss Dr. Zipper outside of MCI’s Board of Director deHberations and that Dr. Zipper was never a topic of discussion or vote at the Board of Directors meetings at Health Midwest.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Howard Cnty. Ambulance Dist. v. City of Fayette

    549 S.W.3d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 2018

    These agreements are in writing and approved by the Board of Alderman. The City does not have a written agreement with the Ambulance District. … (quoting Donovan v. Kansas City , 352 Mo. 430 , 175 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1943) ). See also Fleshner v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. Board of Education of Ritenour Consolidated School District

    538 S.W.2d 765 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1976

    In Century State Bank v. … But on the “conclusion” of the Board of “excessive” absences we have no way of knowing what the basis of the Board decision was. We held in Merideth v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Board of Education, Cass R-VIII School District

    573 S.W.2d 81 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1978

    Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 [1], 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). … Harrisburg R-VIII School District v. O’Brian, 540 S.W.2d 945, 950 [5] (Mo.App.1976); Moore v. Board of Education, 547 S.W.2d 188, 191 [6] (Mo.App.1977).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Cunningham v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE

    311 S.W.3d 391 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 2010

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mullen v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts

    919 S.W.2d 296 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1996

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Olson v. Christian County

    952 S.W.2d 736 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1997

    Hubbs v. Hubbs, 870 S.W.2d 901, 906 [4] (Mo.App. S.D.1994). Evidence outside the trial court record is not considered on appeal. State ex rel. Division of Family Services v. Brown, 897 S.W.2d 154, 159 [10] (Mo.App. … Gary Brown spoke first for the opposition since he filed the appeal....

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Boyd v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    916 S.W.2d 311 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1995

    Rose v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 397 S.W.2d 570, 577 (Mo.1965). … Casey v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 830 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Mo.App.E.D.1992).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Griswold v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts

    901 S.W.2d 125 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moheet v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    154 S.W.3d 393 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2005

    State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts v. McDonagh, 123 S.W.3d 146, 152 (Mo. banc 2003). For purposes of review, the Commission’s action and the Board’s order are “treated as one decision.” Dorman v. … He testified: [V]ital signs are vital.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Merwin v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    399 S.W.3d 110 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 7, 2013

    Merwin relies on Koetting v. State Board of Nursing, 314 S.W.3d 812 (Mo.App. W.D.2010), for support. Although Koetting involves the application of a statute disciplining a nurse’s license, Dr. … Thus, the change eliminated the requirement to prove an addiction before the Board could intervene. . The appellate court stated in Gaddy v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cade v. State, Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services

    41 S.W.3d 31 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2001

    In support, he cites us to Brown Group, Inc. v. Admin. Hearing Comm’n, 649 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. banc 1983); State ex rel. Rogers v. Bd. of Police Comm'rs of Kansas City, 995 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.App. W.D.1999); and Jackson v. … In Jackson , this Court held that the School Board improperly delegated its authority to a three-member committee of the Board to hold Board hearings, such as teacher termination hearings.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McGuckin v. City of St. Louis

    910 S.W.2d 842 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 1995

    Brown v. Tate, 888 S.W.2d 413, 416 (Mo.App.W.D.1994). The legislature has carved out an exception to this general rule, however, in the emergency vehicle statute, RSMo § 304.022. … See Molasky v. Brown, 720 S.W.2d 412, 414 (Mo.App.W.D.1986).

    Overruled by Davis v. Lambert-St. Louis International Airport, 2006 Mo. LEXIS 75 (2006)Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.