Case law

Chandler v. Kansas City Missouri Board of Police Commissioners

469 S.W.3d 852 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2015

Chandler appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, which affirmed a decision by the Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, Missouri, terminating Mr.

Reiz v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City

316 S.W.3d 331 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2010

Standard of Review When a party appeals a trial court’s ruling on the propriety of an administrative decision, we review the decision of the Board, not of the trial court. State ex rel. Teefey v. … the Board’s jurisdiction.

Temple Building v. Building Code Board of Appeals

567 S.W.2d 406 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 1, 1978

Co. v. Kansas City, 321 Mo. 969 , 13 S.W.2d 628, 637 [7-9] (1929). … Behre v. Hemp & Co., 191 S.W. 1038 (Mo.App.1917).

Mark Twain Cape Girardeau Bank v. State Banking Board

528 S.W.2d 443 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1975

Bloom v. The Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, 474 S.W.2d 861 [1] (Mo.App.1971). … Laughlin v. Forgrave, 432 S.W.2d 308 [1] (Mo. banc 1968).

State Ex Rel. Kirkpatrick v. Board of Election Commissioners

686 S.W.2d 888 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1985

McClellan v. … Emily v. Missouri State Div. of Fam.

Fischer v. Fischer

297 S.W.3d 674 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 2009

Leach v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City

118 S.W.3d 646 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 2003

Mann v. City of Pacific, 860 S.W.2d 12, 13-17 (Mo.App.1993); Jordan v. St. … Hagely v. Board of Education of Webster Groves School District, 841 S.W.2d 663, 667 (Mo. banc 1992); Thoroughbred Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, 908 S.W.2d 719, 729 (Mo.App.1995).

Arnold v. Arnold

58 S.W.3d 65 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 2001

Husband, Gary Edwin Arnold, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to wife, Cynthia Brown Arnold.

Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Mayfair Homes Ass'n

634 S.W.2d 246 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 18, 1982

The scope of judicial review of a decision by the Board of Zoning Adjustment is stated in Rosedale-Skinker Imp. Assn. v. … This, of course, follows the requirement of Article V, Section 18, of the Constitution. The same standard is contained in Rule 100.07.

State ex rel. Kerby v. District School Board

97 Mo. App. 613 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1903

How can it (the board) in such case tell which is the appropriate fund on which to order the warrant? … The board of directors is not at its peril required to guess the fund against which it is to order the warrant drawn for the amount of the claim.

Thompson-El v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

832 S.W.2d 24 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1992

Curtis v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City

841 S.W.2d 259 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1992

Reilly v. Sugar Creek, 345 Mo. 1248 , 139 S.W.2d 525, 526 (1940). Section 84.420, RSMo.1986 gives the Board broad powers. … The Supreme Court stated in dicta in Garrity v.

Davis-Bey v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

926 S.W.2d 714 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1996

ORDER PER CURIAM: Michael Davis-Bey appeals the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment seeking review of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole’s (Board’s) decision scheduling him for parole release on August … He claims that the Board incorrectly applied its guidelines and section 558.019, RSMo 1994, in calculating the release date. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Board of Managers v. First Capitol Oil Co.

798 S.W.2d 176 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 1990

At about that time the management of the condominiums was turned over to the residents who selected members of the Board of Management of the Heatherton Homeowners Association, Inc., the plaintiff in this case. … Smith v. Christopher, 737 S.W.2d 510 (Mo.App.1987) [4, 5]. Estoppels are not favorites of the law and will not be lightly invoked. Id. [3].

Missouri Coordinating Board for Higher Education v. Martin

898 S.W.2d 138 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1995

Cain v. Missouri State Board of Podiatry Medicine

872 S.W.2d 508 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1994

Appeal from trial court’s dismissal of petition alleging that Missouri State Board of Podiatry Medicine violated the provisions of sections 610.010 to 610.026, RSMo Supp.1992, relatinS to °Pen meetings and records' Judgment

Murphy v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City

593 S.W.2d 549 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1979

Bartholomew v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 307 S.W.2d 730, 733 [7] (Mo.App.1957). … In that situation only the procéedings before the Board are open for review on this appeal. Davis v. O’Bryant, 175 S.W. 931 , 932[2, 3] (Mo.1915).

Stockwell v. Board of Zoning Adjust. of Kansas City

434 S.W.2d 785 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1968

Louis Public Service Co. v. Public Service Commission, Mo., 291 S.W.2d 95 ; Dunbar v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, Mo.App., 387 S.W.2d 164 . … Carroll Construction Company v. Kansas City, Mo.App., 278 S.W.2d 817, 821 ; Colt v. Bernard, Mo.App., 279 S.W.2d 527, 531 ; Isgrigg v. Board of Trustees of Policemen’s & Firemen’s Pen.

Mason v. Whyte

660 S.W.2d 383 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1983

Elsberry Drainage Dist. v. Seerley, 329 Mo. 1237 , 49 S.W.2d 162, 166 (1932); Brown v. Chaney, 256 Mo. 219 , 165 S.W. 335, 336 (1914). … The use of “Sub.” for subdivision would not make the description defective. *387 “Add.” has been held sufficient to indicate “addition”, Brown v.

Moto, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of St. Louis

88 S.W.3d 96 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2002

This appeal follows. 2 On appeal, we review the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Board of Adjustment and not the circuit court. State ex rel. Sander v. … Teefey v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, Mo., 24 S.W.3d 681, 684 (Mo. banc 2000)).