Case law

State Ex Rel. Hay v. Flynn

235 Mo. App. 1003 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1941

Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 627 , 33 S. W. (2d) 104 .] … Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 627 , 33 S. W. (2d) 124 , which construed provisions of the former registration statute applicable to cities of the size of Kansas City.

Office Supply Store.com v. Kansas City School Board

334 S.W.3d 574 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2011

Browning Enterp., Inc. v. Rex Iron & Mach. Prods. Co., 504 F.Supp.2d 1217, 1224 (N.D.Ala.2007) (citations omitted); see also, e.g., Phillips Exeter Academy v. … See Klocek v.

Shiverdecker v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Fulton

351 S.W.2d 43 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1961

We set forth the exact findings and ruling of the Board: “The Zoning Board of Adjustment rules in this case that the requested variance shall be denied. … Many decisions discuss the scope of such review and in Carlyle-Lowell, Inc. v.

Madden v. Poplar Bluff R-1 School District

399 S.W.3d 843 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 2013

“D” v. Camden County Comm’n, 800 S.W.2d 452, 456 (Mo.App.1990). It is undisputed that board members Price, Robertson and Brown attended the entire termination hearing. … School Dist. of Kansas City, 606 S.W.2d 189, 196 (Mo.App.1980) (applying this rule to the termination of a tenured teacher rendered pursuant to §§ 168.118-.120); Brown v.

Volkman v. City of Kirkwood

624 S.W.2d 58 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1981

Brown v. Beuc, supra at 852. … Brown v. Beuc, supra. Also see Rosedale-Skinker Improvement Ass’n v. Board of Adjustment, supra. We find no merit in this point as raised. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. STEPHAN, P.

Robinson v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners

212 S.W.3d 165 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2006

Nelson v. Crane, 187 S.W.3d 868, 869 (Mo. banc 2006). We review such questions de novo. Id. … Cook Tractor Co., Inc. v. Director of Revenue, 187 S.W.3d 870, 873 (Mo. banc 2006). Undefined words are given their plain and ordinary meaning as found in the dictionary. Id. (citing Asbury v.

Mitchell v. Wellston Board of Education

567 S.W.2d 143 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1978

In Young v. … Winthrop Sales Corporation v. Shelton, 389 S.W.2d 70 [4, 6] (Mo.App.1965). It may well be that plaintiff breached the employment contract.

Russo v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole

336 S.W.3d 472 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2011

ORDER PER CURIAM: Following the denial of parole by the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, Benjamin Russo filed a motion for declaratory judgment, or in the alternative, habe-as corpus or mandamus. … The Parole Board filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted. This appeal follows.

Schaffer v. Board of Education of St. Louis

869 S.W.2d 163 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1993

The majority of board’s custodians and food service workers selected union as the “exclusive bargaining representative” for all of board’s custodians and food service workers; board so recognized union. … Retail Clerks Int’l Ass’n v.

Brown v. Scott-New Madrid-Mississippi Electric Cooperative

728 S.W.2d 303 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1987

Graeff v. Baptist Temple of Springfield, 576 S.W.2d 291 (Mo. banc 1978); Cole v. Plummer, 661 S.W.2d 828 (Mo.App.1983); O’Riley v. Coffelt, 588 S.W.2d 203 (Mo.App.1979). … Kennedy v. Bi-State Development Agency, 668 S.W.2d 260 (Mo.App.1984); Executive Jet Management & Pilot Service, Inc. v. Scott, 629 S.W.2d 598 (Mo.App.1981); Tennis v. General Motors Corp., 625 S.W.2d 218 (Mo.App.1981).

State ex rel. Nance v. Board of Trustees

961 S.W.2d 90 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1998

As we previously noted in Hale v. … Rector v. City of Springfield, 820 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Mo.App.1991). See also Sheehan v. Springfield Seed and Floral, 733 S.W.2d 795, 797 (Mo.App.1987). The Board counters that the worker’s compensation cases cited by Mr.

O'Brien v. State Board of Cosmetology

776 S.W.2d 896 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1989

Gamble v. Hoffman, 732 S.W.2d 890, 892 [1] (Mo. banc 1987). For purposes of review, the action of the Commission and the order of the Board are treated as one decision. § 621.145. … This court reviews the findings and decision of the Board, not the judgment of the Circuit Court. Hulshof v. Mo. Highway & Transp. Com’n, 737 S.W.2d 726, 727 (Mo. banc 1987).

Gipson v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

609 S.W.2d 468 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1980

Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845 (Mo. … Sheridan v.

Henson ex rel. Lincoln v. Board of Education

948 S.W.2d 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1997

The Board of Education of the Washington School District (the District) appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Damian Henson and Laura Lincoln (both referred to as plaintiffs). … Nachtweih v. Maravilla, 861 S.W.2d 164, 167-68 (Mo. App. E.D.1993); see also Lawton v. Jewish Hosp., 679 S.W.2d 370, 374 (Mo.App.

Heinen v. Police Personnel Board of Jefferson City

976 S.W.2d 534 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1998

Kendrick v. Board of Police Commrs. of Kansas City, 945 S.W.2d 649, 651 (Mo.App.1997). … Mueller v. Ruddy, 617 S.W.2d 466, 478 (Mo.App.1981).

Board of Trustees of Westminster College v. Dimmitt

113 Mo. App. 41 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1905

Board of Trustees of Westminster College, at Fulton, in the State of Missouri, in amount and manner following,” etc. The evidence shows that the widow of Joseph I. … In Rountree v. Dixon, 105 N.

Carroll v. Board of Police Commissioners

768 S.W.2d 654 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1989

Roberts v. McNary, 636 S.W.2d 332, 335 (Mo. banc 1982). … As observed by this court in Meyer v. St. Louis County, 602 S.W.2d 728 , 734 . (Mo.App.1980), quoting Easy Living Mobile Manor, Inc. v.

Smith v. Missouri State Board of Probation & Parole

743 S.W.2d 123 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1988

Louis County v. State Tax Commission, 608 S.W.2d 413, 414 (Mo. banc 1980). The element of adversity is essential to the meaning of “contested case” as that term is used in § 536.100. See City of Richmond Heights v. … Ortega v. Ortega, 695 S.W.2d 162, 163 (Mo.App.1985). The appeal is dismissed. All concur.

Campbell v. Missouri Personnel Advisory Board

687 S.W.2d 272 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1985

Overland Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Missouri State Highway Comm’n, 616 S.W.2d 563, 566 (Mo.App.1981). … State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Finch, 514 S.W.2d 608, 616 (Mo.App.1974). An extended opinion would have no value as precedent. Rule 84.16(b). The judgment is affirmed.

Brown v. Current River Land & Cattle Co.

100 Mo. App. 75 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1903