Case law

Highlands Homes Ass'n v. Board of Adjustment

306 S.W.3d 561 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2009

“A board may consider the hearsay testimony of city staff members received without objection.” Baumer v. City of Jennings, 247 S.W.3d 105, 113 (Mo.App. E.D.2008); State ex rel. Sander v. … Repeated grants of variances on this issue could possibly constitute an abuse of the Board’s discretion. 3 See Wehrle v. Cassor, 708 S.W.2d 788, 791 (Mo.App.

Executive Board v. Windermere Baptist Conference Center, Inc.

430 S.W.3d 274 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2014

Haynes Family Corp. v. Dean Properties, Inc., 928 S.W.2d 465 , 466[2] (Mo. App. S.D.1996); Amparan v. Martinez, 862 S.W.2d 497, 498 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). … See Willis v. Missouri Farm Bureau Services, Inc., 396 S.W.3d 451, 454 (Mo.App. W.D.2013). Here, The Executive Board’s failure to comply with Rule 84.04 is so serious as to impede our appellate review. See Yates v.

Cody v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

111 S.W.3d 547 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2003

Coats v. Hickman, 11 S.W.3d 798, 807 (Mo.App.1999). … Slankard v. Thomas, 912 S.W.2d 619, 628 (Mo.App.1995).

Mozee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

401 S.W.3d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 2013

In McDermott v. … Edger v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 307 S.W.3d 718 (Mo.App.

Christiansen v. Missouri State Board of Accountancy

764 S.W.2d 943 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1988

In Tribune Publishing Co. v. … Refer to the case of Christiansen v. Missouri State Board of Accountancy, 764 S.W.2d 952 (Mo.App.1988), decided and ruled concurrently with the opinion herein. .

Christiansen v. Missouri State Board of Accountancy

764 S.W.2d 952 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1988

The Board has .directed this court’s attention to the case of Watson v. … Warren v. Warren, 601 S.W.2d 683, 687 (Mo.App. 1980); Central Moloney, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 627 S.W.2d 39, 41 (Mo.App.1975). In support of its position, the Board cites the case of Payne v. St.

Bantle v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

256 S.W.3d 205 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2008

Bantle sought a declaratory judgment from the trial court to determine *206 whether the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole (the Board) had correctly calculated his prison term. … Bantle alleges that this violates the holding in Jackson v. Kaiser, 353 Mo. 919 , 185 S.W.2d 784 (1945).

Johnson v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

359 S.W.3d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2012

Denbow v. State, 309 S.W.3d 831, 834 (Mo. App.2010). … Moore v. State, 318 S.W.3d 726, 734 (Mo. App.2010).

Campbell v. Personnel Board of Kansas City

666 S.W.2d 806 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1984

Younge v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346 (Mo.1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 922 (1970). … Board of Fire and Police Commissioners, 90 Ill.App.2d 31 , 234 N.E.2d 339 (1967)[5]; Leeks v. State, 95 Okl.Cr.App. 326, 245 P.2d 764 (1952)[14-16].”

Langston v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

325 S.W.3d 562 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 2010

Langston sought a declaration that the Board had erroneously *564 determined that he would never be eligible for parole and miscalculated his parole eligibility in contradiction to § 217.690(4) and Wolfe v. … Bugg v. Roper, 179 S.W.3d 893, 894 (Mo. banc 2005). The Board’s argument that this rule applies to this case is, however, fundamentally flawed.

Howard v. Missouri State Board of Education

847 S.W.2d 187 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1993

In Gast v. … Director of Revenue, 804 S.W.2d 22, 25 (Mo. banc 1991), the propriety of the Board’s order of revocation. In Killeron v. American Bankers Ins.

Jeannie Owens v. Missouri State Board of Nursing

474 S.W.3d 607 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 2015

In State v. … In Fee v.

Verna Properties, LLC v. Board of Adjustment

188 S.W.3d 50 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2006

Co., Inc., 170 S.W.3d at 50 (quoting Wolfner v. Board of Adj. City of Warson Woods, 114 S.W.3d 298, 303 (Mo.App. E.D.2003)). … Cousin’s Adver., Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 78 S.W.3d 774, 783 (Mo.App. W.D.2002).

Kukuljan v. Metropolitan Board of Police Commissioners

871 S.W.2d 119 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1994

Our review is limited to a determination of whether the Board’s findings and order are supported by competent and substantial evidence. Jackson v. Sayad, 741 S.W.2d 847, 850 (Mo.App.1987). … The Board is vested with broad discretion to impose discipline for the violation of department rules and regulations. State ex rel. Baer v. Campbell, 794 S.W.2d 690, 691 (Mo.App.1990).

Howard v. Missouri State Board of Education

913 S.W.2d 887 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1995

North Callaway Board of Education, 777 S.W.2d 275, 276 (Mo.App.1989) (quoting Lopez v. Vance, 509 S.W.2d 197, 202 (Mo.App.1974)). … See also Younge v.

Township Board ex rel. Feitz v. McPhearson

172 Mo. App. 369 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1913

[State v. Feitz, 154 Mo. App. 578 .] … In this respect the case differs from Moore v. Hawk, 57 Mo. App. 495 , relied upon by relator.

Cole v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

947 S.W.2d 124 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 1997

Fults v. Missouri Bd. of Probation and Parole, 857 S.W.2d 388, 392 (Mo.App.1993); Maggard v. Wyrick, 800 F.2d 195, 198 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 1068 , 107 S.Ct. 958 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1006 (1987). … Contrary to appellant’s assertion that the Board has “limited” discretion, section 217.690 gives the Board “almost unlimited discretion.” State ex rel. Cavallaro v.

Richard Brown & Son Contracting Co. v. Bambrick Bros. Construction Co.

150 Mo. App. 505 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1910

. & Pr. 941; Smiley v. Deweese, 1 Ind. App. 211 ; Pryor v. Kansas City, 153 Mo. 135 , 54 S. W. 499 ; Wilcox v. Cohn, 5 Blatchf. (U. S.) 346. … The contract is executed and signed by Richard Brown & Son C. Company, per John J. Brown, president and general manager.

Duvall v. Coordinating Board for Higher Education

873 S.W.2d 856 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1994

The Board next contends that Duvall has no standing as a taxpayer because his petition fails to allege an increased tax burden. The Board relies on Brock v. City of St. … Sullivan v. Carlisle, 851 S.W.2d 510, 512 [1—3] (Mo. banc 1993). In this case Duvall pleaded that certain rules, policies and procedures of the Board were illegal for stated reasons.

Anselmo v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

27 S.W.3d 831 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2000

Jones v. Carnahan, 965 S.W.2d 209, 214 (Mo.App.1998). Roy v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, 23 S.W.3d 738, 742-43 (Mo.App.W.D.2000). … Cavallaro v. Groose, 908 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Mo. banc 1995). The Board has almost unlimited discretion in whether to grant parole release. Id.