Case law

Wilkins v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

374 S.W.3d 359 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 2012

Wilkins appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition seeking a declaratory judgment against the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. The trial court found Mr.

Braeshire Condominium Board of Managers v. Brinkmeyer

841 S.W.2d 217 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1992

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … The Board relies primarily on two cases: Lake Tishomingo Property Owners Association v. Cronin, 679 S.W.2d 852 (Mo. banc 1984), and Colvin v. Carr, 799 S.W.2d 153 (Mo.App.1990).

Minion v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

411 S.W.3d 338 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 2013

Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

398 S.W.3d 87 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 2013

Lee, Sr. filed a petition for declaratory judgment that claimed the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole improperly calculated when he would be eligible for parole, conditional release, or other early release under section … Lee argues that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition because the Board presented no evidence that prove that the alleged prior prison commitments were prison commitments as a matter of law. We affirm.

Hawkes v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

410 S.W.3d 267 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2013

ORDER PER CURIAM: Walter Hawkes appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Cole County granting the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in his declaratory judgment action against the Missouri Board

Selby v. North Callaway Board of Education

777 S.W.2d 275 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1989

Rainwater v. Board of Education of Greenville, supra, at 176-77; Rafael v. Meramec Valley R-III Board of Education, supra, at 309, 315; Pollard v. … Pollard v. Board of Education Reorganized School, supra, at 671.

Oglebay v. Kansas City Board of Trade

99 Mo. App. 433 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1903

The attorney of the Board of Trade then prepared a lease from the Trust Company to the Board of Trade, which was executed by the trust company but while said attorney was reading’ it to the officers of the board of trade, … party is to have the option of renewing the lease from year to year, which option may be exercised from year to year for five years from July 1, 1898,” Upon principle,- this question falls within the rule applied in Donovan v.

Watley v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

863 S.W.2d 337 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1992

Brown v. St. Louis County, 792 S.W.2d 398, 401 (Mo.App.1990). … See Tomich v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 585 F.Supp. 939, 940 (W.D.Mo.1984).

Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

391 S.W.3d 927 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2013

The petition alleged that the Board of Probation and Parole erroneously relied on false information in denying Lee parole thus denying Lee due process.

State Ex Rel. Division of Family Services v. Brown

897 S.W.2d 154 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1995

Shoemaker v. Shoemaker, 812 S.W.2d 250, 256 [14] (Mo.App.W.D.1991); McCammon v. McCammon, 680 S.W.2d 196, 202 [12] (Mo.App.W.D.1984). However, Welch v. … In Crawford v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Christy v. Board of Education

694 S.W.2d 280 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1985

In so doing the evidence must be considered in a light most favorable to the Board’s decision, together with all reasonable inferences that support it. Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools v. … Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 781-82 (Mo. banc 1976); Rainwater v. Board of Education of Greenville, 645 S.W.2d 172, 173-74 (Mo.App.1983).

Harness v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

749 S.W.2d 7 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1988

Plaintiff, following the lead of the plaintiff in the case of Gallup v. … The trial court found the Board properly concluded that § 195.221 applied to plaintiff.

Boutelle v. Boutelle

124 Mo. App. 450 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1907

Henry V. Brown, on his mother’s side. The contest is- between these parties. Mrs. Brown says her daughter, who was the wife of Fred C. … Brown and her husband. The return of Mrs.

McLaughlin v. Board of Education

659 S.W.2d 249 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1983

The narrow construction of the word “position” urged by appellant here was rejected in Carter County R — I School District v. Palmer, 627 S.W.2d 664 (Mo.App.1982). … Carter County R-I School District v. Palmer, 627 S.W.2d at 666 .

Rogers v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

371 S.W.3d 806 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 2011

ORDER PER CURIAM: Anthony Rogers appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole on his petition seeking a declaration that he became eligible for parole on June 14, 2010, and

Mark Wagner v. Missouri State Board of Nursing

570 S.W.3d 147 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 2019

Curtis v. Mo. … “The Board’s decision is presumed valid, and the burden is on the party attacking it to overcome that presumption.” Curtis v. Mo.

Rainwater v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF GREENVILLE

645 S.W.2d 172 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1982

In Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools, Etc. v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 781-782 (Mo. banc 1976), a board of education terminated the indefinite contract of a permanent teacher. … In Conder v.

New v. MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE

343 S.W.3d 775 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 2011

In his petition, he claimed the Missouri Department of Corrections and the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole have a duty to recalculate his mandatory minimum prison term based upon changes to § 558.019, RSMo.

Irvin v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

34 S.W.3d 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2000

See Boersig v. … Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 30 , 101 S.Ct. 960, 965 , 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981). In State v. Frederick, 783 S.W.2d 469, 472 (Mo.App.

Highlands Homes Ass'n v. Board of Adjustment

306 S.W.3d 561 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2009

“A board may consider the hearsay testimony of city staff members received without objection.” Baumer v. City of Jennings, 247 S.W.3d 105, 113 (Mo.App. E.D.2008); State ex rel. Sander v. … Repeated grants of variances on this issue could possibly constitute an abuse of the Board’s discretion. 3 See Wehrle v. Cassor, 708 S.W.2d 788, 791 (Mo.App.