Case law

Angela L. Brown v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2020

rests primarily on McKay v. … However, we disagree that Brown’s motion should be considered “premature” under Rule 24.035; instead, as discussed above, she lacks standing to file the motion. In McKay v.

CASEBOLT, DDS v. Missouri Dental Board

324 S.W.3d 779 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 2010

ORDER PER CURIAM: Buford Casebolt appeals the judgment of the Missouri Dental Board revoking his dental license for at least one year.

State of Missouri v. Robert L. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 2020

State v. Drake, 514 S.W.3d 633, 642 (Mo. App. 2017). Count V charged Brown with first-degree statutory sodomy for putting his penis in K.E.’s anus while in the garage. … Brown’s right to a unanimous verdict on Count V was not violated.

Brown v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. Louis

298 S.W.2d 471 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1957

Action for personal injuries by Percy Brown against Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis. … When plaintiff boarded the Wabash train at Decatur, Illinois to be carried to St.

Edger v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

307 S.W.3d 718 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 2010

Fourteen CSR 80-2.010 sets forth the guidelines under which the Parole Board is to determine the parole eligibility of an offender. Cooper v. Holden, 189 S.W.3d 614, 618 (Mo.App. W.D.2006). … by the Board.”

Mary Noel v. Board of Election

465 S.W.3d 88 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2015

Brown v. Carnahan, 370 S.W.3d 637, 646 (Mo. banc 2012) (citing Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.3d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976)). A determination of the constitutional validity of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. … Brown, 370 S.W.3d at 645, quoting United Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n of Mo. v. Nixon, 19 S.W.3d 137, 139 (Mo. banc 2000).

Sedalia Board of Trade v. Brady

78 Mo. App. 585 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 1899

Sumner v. Summers, 54 Mo. 340 ; Sprague v. Rooney, 104 Mo. 360 ; affirmed in Haggerty v. Ice Mfg. & Storage Co., 143 Mo. loc. cit. 247, 248; Griswold v. … Downing v. Ringer, 7 Mo. side page 585, top page 292; Bick v. Seal, 45 Mo. App. 475 ; Connor v. Black, 119 Mo. 126 .

Jackson v. Board of Police Commissioners

253 S.W.3d 85 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2008

Louis Board of Police Commissioners (hereinafter, “the Board”) terminating his employment. Jackson raises three points on appeal. … First, Jackson claims he was entitled to a full hearing before the Board rather than before a hearing officer.

Kyle v. State Personnel Advisory Board

607 S.W.2d 848 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 1980

The trial court affirmed the order of the board. … Eckles v.

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. H. M. Brown Coal Co.

226 Mo. App. 1038 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1932

[Wooldridge v. Bryan, 307 Mo. 234, 244 , 270 S. W. 658 .] … [Koch v. Sanford Loan & Realty Co., 220 Mo. App. 369 , 400, 286 S. W. 832 .]

Walls v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

408 S.W.3d 153 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 2013

ORDER PER CURIAM: William Walls appeals the summary-judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole (“Board”) on his petition seeking a declaration that he became eligible for parole on his previously scheduled … date, and granted summary judgment for the Board.

State Ex Rel. City of Springfield v. Brown

181 S.W.3d 219 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2005

Ford Motor Co. v. … In State v.

Shaw v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

937 S.W.2d 771 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1997

Under this statute, a prisoner has “no justifiable expectation of release, giving the Board ‘almost unlimited discretion’ in whether to grant parole release.” State ex rel. Cavallaro v. … Groose, 908 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Mo. banc 1995) (quoting Ingrassia v. Purkett, 985 F.2d 987, 988 (8th Cir.1993)). This statute, accordingly, does not create a liberty interest in parole. Id.

Cain v. State Board of Podiatry

834 S.W.2d 260 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1992

The court cited the following cases: Cain v. Scott, 782 F.2d 1050 (8th Cir.1985); Cain v. State of Arkansas and Arkansas State Podiatry Board, 734 F.2d 377 (8th Cir.1984); Cain v. … Arkansas State Podiatry Examining Board, 275 Ark. 100 , 628 S.W.2d 295 (1982); Cain v. Hershewe, 760 S.W.2d 146 (Mo.App.1988); Cain v. Cain, 546 S.W.2d 203 (Mo.App.1977); Cain v. Cain, 536 S.W.2d 866 (Mo.App.1976).

Frumhoff v. Missouri Development Finance Board

181 S.W.3d 218 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2005

Appellant, Marti Frumhoff (“Frum-hoff’), appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of Cole County dismissing her Petition for Declaratory Judgment against Respondents Missouri Development Finance Board, Missouri Department

Patterson v. State Board of Optometry

668 S.W.2d 240 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1984

Peerless Supply Company v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Company, 460 S.W.2d 651, 666 (Mo.1970). … Green’s Bottom Sportsmen, Inc. v. St. Charles County Board of Adjustment, 553 S.W.2d 721 (Mo.App.1977). No exceptional circumstance exists in this case.

Retirement Board, Etc. v. Kansas City

224 S.W.2d 623 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 1949

In settling disputes, under the Police Retirement Act, as to who are policemen, the Board of Police Commissioners sits in its quasi-judicial capacity. State ex rel. Idlet v. Lockwood, Mo.App., 201 S.W.2d 514 . … United Cemeteries Co. v. Strother, 342 Mo. 1155 , 119 S.W.2d 762 . Such, also, is the case with rulings or decisions of quasi-judicial bodies. King et al. v. Priest et al., Mo., 206 S.W.2d 547 .

In Re Marriage of Brown

218 S.W.3d 2 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 2007

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

Baker v. Board of Building Appeals

99 S.W.3d 10 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2002

Baker and Larry Baker, as trustees of the Baker Family Trust, appeal *11 from the circuit court’s judgment affirming a decision by the University City Board of Appeals that affirmed a condemnation order issued by the University

Morris v. Christian Board of Publication

943 S.W.2d 249 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1997

Szydlowski v. Metro Moving & Storage Co., 924 S.W.2d 325 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An opinion would have no precedential value. The Commission’s order is sustained pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).