Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
516 results
1.54s
Missouri Attorney General Reports · May 22, 2002
Bushell v. Schepp , 613 S.W.2d 689 (Mo.App. 1981). The issue presented is whether a representative of a corporation can serve as a member of the board of supervisors of either a drainage district or levee district. … Cocktail Fortune, Inc. v. Supervisor of Liquor Control , 994 S.W.2d 955 (Mo. 1999).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 17, 1979
Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. Davis, 488 S.W.2d 193 , 197 (Mo. Banc 1972). … The committee's function is to advise the Coordinating Board of the views of institutions on matters within the purview of the Coordinating Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1984
See, e.g., Arkansas-Missouri Power Co. v. City of Kennett, 78 F.2d 911 , 918-923 (8th Circ. 1935), appeal dismissed in part, Missouri Public Service Co. v. City of Trenton, 80 F.2d 520 (8th Cir. 1935); Stewart v. … See, e.g., Lien v. City of Ketchikan, 383 P.2d 721 (Alaska 1963); State Bank Trust Co. of Richmond v. Madison County, 275 Ky. 501 , 122 S.W.2d 99 (1938); Booth v. City of Owensboro, 274 Ky. 325 , 118 S.W.2d 684 (1938).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 9, 1988
M. v. Hoester, 681 S.W.2d 449 , 450 (Mo. banc 1984). Moreover, legislative intent must be ascertained by giving effect to the plain language of the statute when viewed as a whole. A. B. v. … Huddleston v. Gitt and Sons Realty, 708 S.W.2d 149 , 150 (Mo.App. 1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 2004
McGaughey v. Grayston , 163 S.W.2d 335 , 339-40 (Mo.banc 1942). We have previously opined that it is incompatible to simultaneously serve as a county commissioner and a member of a school board. … See Goldberg v. State Tax Comm'n , 639 S.W.2d 796 , 805 (Mo. 1982) (statutes dealing with the same subject matter should be read in para materia ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 2001
McGaughey v. Grayston , 163 S.W.2d 335 (Mo.banc 1942). … a school board member or member of a city council.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 1988
Stiffelman v. Abrams, 655 S.W.2d 522 , 531 (Mo. banc 1983); Graves v. Little Tarkio Drainage Dist. No. 1, 134 S.W.2d 70 , 78 (Mo. 1939). … Section 171.011 , RSMo 1986, regarding the authority of school boards to make rules and regulations, states: 171.011 School board may adopt rules and regulations. — The school board of each school district in the state may
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 4, 1979
It is our view that the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners is a state agency generally, because the Missouri Supreme Court concluded in ABC Security Service, Inc. v. … It is clear, of course, that some of the rules promulgated by the Board do not come within the definition of "rule" under Section 536.010 (4). McCallister v. Priest, 422 S.W.2d 650 , 659 (Mo. 1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 17, 1978
Section 175.040 , RSMo 1969, provides that: "It is hereby provided that the board of curators of the Lincoln university shall organize after the manner of the board of curators of the state university of Missouri; and it … City of Nevada v. Bastow, 328 S.W.2d 45 , 49 (K.C.Mo.App. 1959).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 22, 1981
whole board votes therefor. … Stewart v. King, 562 S.W.2d 704 (Mo.App., K.C.D. 1978).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 1977
Board employees shall be subject to the same restrictions and subscribe the same oath as members of the board, except that no employee of a board shall be required to post bond unless directed to do so by the board. … Gray v. Wallace, 319 S.W.2d 582 (Mo. 1958). Therefore, attorneys are considered "employees" under such sections.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 1991
In Myers v. … Petka v. Bingle, 112 Ill. App.3d 73 , 68 Ill.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 7, 1977
made by the Anatomical Board. … Although repeals by implication are not favored, Graves v. Little Tarkio Drainage Dist.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 1, 1979
If so, whether such provision is constitutional in light of the decision in Street v. Maries County R-1 School District of Maries County, 511 S.W.2d 814 (Mo. 1974). Section 164.011 .1 provides: "1. … X , § 11(c) , Missouri Constitution, requires that the purpose of a proposed increase in a school tax levy must be submitted to the voters, Street v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 2001
and the board of aldermen may provide by ordinance that the same person may be elected marshal and collector, at the same election, and hold both offices and the board of aldermen may provide by ordinance for the election … Page Western Inc. v. Community Fire Protection District of St. Louis County , 636 S.W.2d 65 , 67 (Mo.banc 1982).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1999
Riordan v. Dierker , 956 S.W.2d 258 , 260 (Mo. banc 1997). … AG Processing, Inc. v. South St. Joseph Industrial Sewer District , 937 S.W.2d 319 , 324 (Mo.App. W.D. 1996).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1997
Conagra Poultry Co. v. Director of Revenue , 862 S.W.2d 915 , 917 (Mo.banc 1993). … The statute requires "any vote on a final decision" to be made available to the public and does not require information which was considered by the board to be made available. In Tuft v. City of St.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 1978
Gershman Investment Corp. v. Danforth, 517 S.W.2d 33 (Mo.Banc 1974). … Co. v. Gehner, 8 S.W.2d 1068 (Mo.Banc 1928).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 5, 1979
"At such a proposed meeting, the board would not enter into a dialogue between board members, no decision would be made, no business would be discussed between board members, and no votes would be taken, either formally or … In Cohen v. Poelker, 520 S.W.2d 50 (Mo.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1995
at their next meeting; provided, however, that any person having a claim against the township may present said claim to the township board himself, or by an agent, at any legally convened meeting of said board; said board … In Jensen v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna