Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
516 results
0.50s
Missouri Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 1976
Smith v. Bowman, 170 S.W. 700, 703 (Spr.Ct.App. 1914). See also Witmer v. Nichols, 8 S.W.2d 63 (Mo. 1928); Smith v. Hendricks, 136 S.W.2d 449 (Spr.Ct.App. 1939); and Nodaway County v. Kidder, 129 S.W.2d 857 (Mo. 1939). … The basis for this prohibition is discussed by the Missouri Supreme Court in Witmer v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 21, 2001
Sermchief v. Gonzales , 660 S.W.2d 683 (Mo. 1983). This is particularly true when there is an apparent ambiguity in a statute. State ex rel. Rogers v. … Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. Bowers , 965 S.W.2d 203 (Mo.App. 1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1982
City of Willow Springs v. Missouri State Librarian, 596 S.W.2d 441 , 445 (Mo. banc 1980). In addition, we are to assign the words and phrases employed by the legislature their usual, plain and ordinary meaning. … Ashcroft v. Union Electric Co., 559 S.W.2d 216 , 221 (Mo.App. 1977). We find no express statutory provision granting authority to such a board to acquire legal title to property.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1987
In Arizona Board of Regents v. … In Marston v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 1983
Nor can it be said that the Park Board of Commissioners is a de facto park board which, because of its assumption of the powers granted in Section 90.550 , properly enjoys the exercise of those powers. In Cherry v. … City of Republic v. Smith, 139 S.W.2d 929 (Mo. banc 1940), Fort Osage Drainage Dist. of Jackson County v. Jackson County, 275 S.W.2d 326 (Mo. 1955), and State ex rel. Hand v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1987
Lebeau v. Kelly, 697 S.W.2d 312 (Mo.App. 1985). … O'Flaherty v. State Tax Commission of Missouri, 680 S.W.2d 153 (Mo. banc 1984).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1984
Cohen v. Poelker, 520 S.W.2d 50 , 53-54 (Mo.Banc 1975). We also note that the Administrative Procedure Act applies to municipal agencies. Hunter v. Madden, 565 S.W.2d 456 , 458 (Mo.App. 1978). … Mills v. Federal Soldiers Home, 549 S.W.2d 862 , 865 (Mo.Banc 1977). Cf. Vorbeck v. McNeal, 560 S.W.2d 245 , 250 (Mo.App. 1977) (mere censure of public employee by employer did not create a contested case).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 1980
In Golden v. … McAllister v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 13, 1977
Thus, under normal circumstances, personnel could not be hired by a six-member board unless four members voted in favor of hiring. However, in Bonsack Pearce, Inc. v. … A similar result was reached in Mullins v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1984
McKittrick v. … Stephens v. Fletchall, 412 S.W.2d 423 (Mo. banc 1967). In State ex inf. Graham v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 23, 1977
Black v. … And, in State Board of Agriculture v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 20, 1981
The law regulating the practice of medicine or surgery, first enacted in 1877 (see State v. Smith, 135 S.W. 463 , 468 (Mo. 1911)), last generally reenacted in 1959 (S.B. … State Tax Commission v. Yeaman, Judge, 451 S.W.2d 115 , 118 (Mo. banc 1970). And, as expressed in Meyers v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 1996
You report that the Macon County 911 Board is operating under a three eighths percent sales tax adopted in November 1994 and earmarked for the board's use. … Louis Housing Authority v. Gaertner , 695 S.W.2d 460 , 462 (Mo. banc 1985). Section 190.335 is silent on whether the central dispatch board may appoint or elect a treasurer to distribute the special sales tax revenues.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 1981
Wilson v. McNeal, 575 S.W.2d 802 , 810 (Mo.App., St.L.D. 1978). … Wilson v. McNeal, supra, l.c. 811.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 1981
In our view, the presiding judge of the county court is not a regular member of the board or an ex-officio member of the board in the normal sense under Section 162.301 .3 but is only considered a member of the board for … State v. Reid, 28 S.W. 172 (Mo.Sup. 1894). Therefore, Section 105.458 would not apply to the presiding judge in the situation you have presented.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1980
Lancaster v. County of Atchison, 352 Mo. 1039 , 180 S.W.2d 706 , 708 (banc 1944). Furthermore, the individual members of the mental health board of trustees are public officers as defined by State ex rel. Zevely v. … Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co., 283 U.S. 643 , 51 S.Ct. 587 , 75 L.Ed. 1324 , 79 A.L.R. 1191 (1931); 67 C.J.S. Officers, § 190.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 1, 1996
Trainliner Corp. v. Director of Revenue , 783 S.W.2d 917 (Mo. banc 1990). We find that meaning in the dictionary. Delta Airlines, Inc. v. Director of Revenue , no. 77667 (Mo. banc Oct. 24, 1995) slip op. at 4. … The term "voluntary" modifies either "district" or "board." In State ex inf. Gavin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 30, 2003
Board of Public Buildings v. … Coop., Inc. v. State Envtl.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1992
City of Jackson v. Houck, 43 S.W.2d 908 , 909 (Mo.App. 1931). Section 79.130 , RSMo Supp. 1991, sets forth the procedure to be followed by a fourth class city in enacting an ordinance. Such section provides: 79.130 . … Cimasi v. City of Fenton, 659 S.W.2d 532 , 535 (Mo.App. 1983). Section 79.280 provides for a successor to be selected but sets forth no specific procedure.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 1992
Wolff Shoe Company v. Director of Revenue, 762 S.W.2d 29 , 31 (Mo. banc 1988). … testimony which shall be heard and determined by the board."
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna