Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoag

516 results

0.31s

  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 16, 1992

    Deposits in the fund shall be expended only upon approval of the facility's board of directors. [Emphasis added.] 205.972 . Maximum tax — ballot form. — 1. … Wolff Shoe Company v. Director of Revenue, 762 S.W.2d 29 , 31 (Mo. banc 1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1986)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1986

    Each member of the board has one vote on all matters. The board also elects from their number for two-year terms a president, vice-president, and combination secretary/treasurer. … [Emphasis added] School District of Kansas City v. Kansas City, 382 S.W.2d 688 , 692 (Mo. banc 1962), accord, Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1997

    It shall be lawful for the county commission of any county, and the comptroller, mayor and president of the board of assessors of the city of St. … McMullin v. Carter , 639 S.W.2d 815 , 817-18 (Mo. banc 1982); St. Louis Housing Authority v. Evans , 285 S.W.2d 550 , 553 (Mo. 1955); State ex rel. Buder v. Hughes , 166 S.W.2d 516 , 518 (Mo. 1942); Campbell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 31-79 (1979)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1979

    Do federal funds paid directly to the Board of Education of the City of St. … Mallory v. Barrera, supra at 561, citing Harfst v. Hoegen, 163 S.W.2d 609 , 613-614 (Mo.Banc 1942); Berghorn v. Reorganized School Dist. No. 8, 260 S.W.2d 573 , 582-583 (Mo. 1953); Paster v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 78-80 (1980)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 1980

    See People v. Berk, 373 N.Y.S. 201 , 83 Misc.2d 711 (1975) which affirmed the conviction of two promoters of a "Las Vegas Night" for promoting gambling in the second degree and possession of a gambling device. … See State v. One Jack Jill Pinball Machine, 224 S.W.2d 854 , 860 (Mo.App., Spr.D. 1949), which states that gambling has three necessary elements: (1) consideration or risk, (2) chance and (3) reward or prize.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Sep 4, 1985

    Fowler v. Board of Regents for Central Missouri State University, 637 S.W.2d 352 , 354 (Mo.App., W.D. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1987)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1987

    Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983). The plain meaning of the statutory language is to be given effect wherever possible. State ex rel. D.M. v. … Sermchief v. Gonzales, 660 S.W.2d 683 , 688 (Mo. banc 1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion Nos. 166, 167, 168 and 169-80 (1980)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 1980

    In Yuma County v. … In Parker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1984)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1984

    City of Ava v. Yost, 375 S.W.2d 884 , 886 (Mo.App. 1964). … Edwards v. St. Louis County, 429 S.W.2d 718 , 721-722 (Mo.Banc 1968).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1988

    Roberts v. McNary, 636 S.W.2d 332 , 335 (Mo. banc 1982). Boone County Court v. State, 631 S.W.2d 321 , 324 (Mo. banc 1982). … The provision's purposes, according to appellate courts of other states that have construed similar constitutional provisions, include keeping government out of private business, Dade County Board of Public Instruction v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 67-76 (1976)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1976

    Socialist Workers' Party of Missouri v. Kirkpatrick, 513 S.W.2d 346 (Mo.Banc 1974). … See Totton v. Murdock, 482 S.W.2d 65 (Mo.Banc 1972). However, since Pacific, Missouri, is located in St. Louis County as well as Franklin County and since St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1986)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1986

    We note that in Brown v. Weir, 675 S.W.2d 135 , 140 (Mo.App. 1984) and Wilson v. … McNary v. Hais, 670 S.W.2d 494 , 495 (Mo. banc 1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1984)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · May 4, 1984

    In Brown Group, Inc. v. … See v. Allen, 180 Mo. 27 , 79 S.W. 164 (banc 1904). Thus, if the Governor appointed ABBA as agent to receive the fugitive, then ABBA could be compensated by the state upon the approval of the Governor.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 1989

    Missouri State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. Southworth, 704 S.W.2d 219 , 224 (Mo. banc 1986); Collins v. Director of Revenue, 691 S.W.2d 246 , 251 (Mo. banc 1985); O'Flaherty v. … Collins v. Donelson, 557 S.W.2d 707 , 710 (Mo.App. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1989

    Hudson v. Marshall, 549 S.W.2d 147 (Mo.App., Spr.D. 1977). … Hudson v. Marshall, supra, at 151. The source of the requirement to be certificated must be in the law itself and not in a requirement set forth in the contract or otherwise by the local school board. Id. at 153.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 137-80 (1980)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1980

    Brown: This is in answer to your letter of recent date in which you asked whether an elected city councilman is exempt from the lobbyist registration requirements of the state of Missouri. … Patterson v. Ferguson, 65 S.W.2d 97 (Mo. 1933).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 26-79 (1979)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 1979

    Ashcroft v. Union Electric Company, 559 S.W.2d 216 (Mo.Ct.App. at K.C. 1977); Mark Twain Cape Girardeau Bank v. State Banking Board, 528 S.W.2d 443 (Mo.Ct.App. at St.L. 1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 101-76 (1976)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 29, 1976

    Danforth v. Merrell, 530 S.W.2d 209 (Mo.Banc 1975). Also, it is well established that it is unconstitutional to legislate in an appropriation bill. State ex rel. Davis v. … Hudson v. Carter, 27 P.2d 617 , 624-625 (Okla. 1933).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 204-77 (1977)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 1977

    Charles County v. Smith, 152 S.W.2d 1 (Mo.Banc 1941), involving an issue to toll bridge revenue refunding bonds. … City of Albuquerque v. Gott, 389 P.2d 207 (N.M. 1964); State v. City of Melbourne, 93 So.2d 371 (Fla. 1957); Rodin v. State, 417 P.2d 180 (Wyo. 1966); Beaumont v. Faubus, 394 S.W.2d 478 (Ark. 1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 1991

    Fort Zumwalt School District v. Dickherber, 576 S.W.2d 532 (Mo. banc 1979), is applicable here. … Mead v. Jasper County, 322 Mo. 1191 , 18 S.W.2d 464 , 465 (1929); State ex rel. Sisson v. Felker, 336 S.W.2d 419 , 421 (Spr. App. 1960).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.