Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
516 results
1.27s
Missouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 27, 1997
Davis v. Walden, 60 S.W.2d 24 , 26 (Mo. 1933); State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Gehner, 27 S.W.2d 1 , 3 (Mo. banc 1930); City of Hannibal ex rel. Bassen v. … Western Tie Timber Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 17, 1987
See Moore v. Brown, 165 S.W.2d 657 (Mo. banc 1942).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 17, 1987
See Moore v. Brown, 165 S.W.2d 657 (Mo. banc 1942).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1978
Scott v. … Hall v. Vaughn, supra; State ex rel. Voss v. Davis, 418 S.W.2d 163 (Mo. 1967).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1987
See Moore v. Brown, 165 S.W.2d 657 (Mo. banc 1942).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 17, 1987
See Moore v. Brown, 165 S.W.2d 657 (Mo. banc 1942).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 17, 1987
See Moore v. Brown, 165 S.W.2d 657 (Mo. banc 1942).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1986
See Moore v. Brown, 165 S.W.2d 657 (Mo. banc 1942).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · May 11, 1990
See Moore v. Brown, 165 S.W.2d 657 (Mo. banc 1942).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 7, 2003
Butler v. Mitchell-Hugeback, Inc. , 895 S.W.2d 15 (Mo.banc 1995). … Brownstein v. Rhomberg-Haglin Assoc., Inc. , 824 S.W.2d 13 (Mo.banc 1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Sep 7, 2000
Gerrard v. Board of Election Commissioners , 913 S.W.2d 88 (Mo.App. 1995). Any election challenge has to be filed not later than thirty days after the official announcement of the results. See Section 115.577 RSMo 1994. … (JAY) NIXON Attorney General BOARD OF COUNTY VISITORS: Members of the Board of County COUNTY OFFICIALS: Visitors are not immune from LEGAL EXPENSE FUND: liability for their acts as Board members because they are volunteers
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 1989
Dravo Corporation v. Spradling, 515 S.W.2d 512 , 517 (Mo. 1974). … A volunteer to a citizen board is not an employee of the public governmental body.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 19, 1984
State v. Burnau, 642 S.W.2d 621 (Mo. banc 1982). … Capra v. Phillips Investment Company, 302 S.W.2d 924 (Mo. banc 1957). The rule is explained in Betz v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1992
official; (g) The speaker of the house of representatives; (h) The president pro tem of the senate; (i) A board of regents or board of curators of a state institution of higher education; * * * Your first question requires … Page Western, Inc. v. Community Fire Protection District of St. Louis County, 636 S.W.2d 65 , 68 (Mo. banc 1982).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 1, 1977
Although it was held that employees of the Board of Transportation of New York City were not state employees but were city employees, the Board was held to be a state instrumentality. Ferdinand v. … Agency, Limited v. Board of Com'rs of Port of New Orleans, 19 So.2d 178 (La. 1944). Likewise, housing authorities have been held to be state agencies for certain purposes. People ex rel. Stokes v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1990
. — It is unlawful for any school board or any member or employee of a school board to solicit or to receive any money from any teacher employed by their district for the purpose of paying tuition or any other expenses of … Metro Auto Auction v. Director of Revenue, 707 S.W.2d 397 , 401 (Mo. banc 1986). Section 168.151 expressly prohibits a school district from receiving any money from a teacher in the district for tuition purposes.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 1978
proposition to establish an ambulance service was originally submitted as a result of a petition by the voters or by the board of directors. … State v. Crismon, 188 S.W.2d 937 (Mo.Banc 1945). Therefore, we conclude that while the district is not required to levy the maximum authorized five cent tax it is required to furnish emergency ambulance service.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 25, 1987
M. v. Hoester, 681 S.W.2d 449 , 450 (Mo. banc 1984). Moreover, legislative intent must be ascertained by giving effect to the plain language of the statute when viewed as a whole. A. B. v. … Moreover, the use of the term "engineering studies" is limited to those individuals who are licensed by the Missouri Board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 11, 1991
In Scroggs v. … Charles City-County Library District v. St.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 14, 1985
Winograd v. Johnson, 561 P.2d 1274 (Colo.Ct.App. 1976). … Bartley v. Special School District of St. Louis County, 649 S.W.2d 864 , 867 (Mo. banc 1983). In this instance, the specific language of Chapter 195 prevails over the general language of Section 336.220 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna