Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmoag

516 results

0.75s

  • Opinion No. (1990)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1990

    Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983). The plain meaning of the statutory language is to be given effect wherever possible. State ex rel. D.M. v. … State v. Windmiller, 579 S.W.2d 730 , 732 (Mo.App. 1979). See also State ex rel. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Appelquist, 698 S.W.2d 883 , 894 (Mo.App. 1985).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 188-77 (1977)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1977

    In the case of Studley v. Allen, 24 App. … Brown v. Morris, 290 S.W.2d 160 (Mo. Banc 1956).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 1991

    of education may exempt a school district from this provision if the state board of education determines that circumstances warrant such exemption. … Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1984)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1984

    In Costello v. City of St. Louis, 262 S.W.2d 591 (Mo. 1953), overruled on other grounds, Powell v. County of St. … In Lueck v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 123-81 (1981)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 1981

    Thompson v. Board of Regents for Northeast Missouri State Teachers' College, 264 S.W. 698 (Mo. … Thompson v. Board of Regents for Northeast Missouri State Teachers' College, supra, and State ex rel. McKinley Pub. Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1995)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1995

    Jones v. Director of Revenue , 832 S.W.2d 516 , 517 (Mo. banc 1992). … Brown v. Morris , 290 S.W.2d 160 , 166 (Mo. banc 1956).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1987)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 9, 1987

    Brown Group, Inc. v. Administration Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983). … Further support for our conclusion is found in Aurora Water Co. v. City of Aurora, 31 S.W. 946 (Mo. 1895).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 144-76 (1976)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 27, 1976

    See Salera v. Tucker, 399 F. Supp. 1258 (E.D. … See also, Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 (1974), and American Party of Texas v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1993)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 14, 1993

    Larabee v. Washington, 793 S.W.2d 357 , 361 (Mo.App. 1990). When a court construes a statute, it does so in light of the purposes the legislature intended to accomplish and the evils it intended to cure. Brown v. … Section 260.344.2(2), as enacted by Senate Bills Nos. 80, 100, 140 17, provides the report prepared by the Source Reduction Advisory Board shall contain recommendations for a program to maximize the recycling and reuse of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1987)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1987

    Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983). The plain meaning of the statutory language is to be given effect wherever possible. State ex rel. D. M. v. … Rustici v. Weidemeyer, 673 S.W.2d 762 (Mo. banc 1984).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 92-80 (1980)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1980

    Wild v. Brown 120 N.J.Eq. 31 , 183 A. 899 . … Also, in the case of Vest v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2011)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 2011

    Dear Senator Brown: This opinion is in response to your request regarding whether the Phelps County Commissioners must comply with § 56.265 , RSMo 2000, and pay the prosecutor the same pay increases given to the associate … Weinstock v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1987)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 30, 1987

    Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. banc 1983); State ex rel. McNary v. Hais, 670 S.W.2d 494 (Mo. banc 1984). … Missouri State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. Southworth, 704 S.W.2d 219 (Mo. banc 1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 81-76 (1976)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1976

    Relying on the case of Bush Terminal Co. v. … Brown v. Morris, 290 S.W.2d 160 (Mo.Banc 1956).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74a-76 (1976)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1976

    This was the holding of the Court of Appeals, Kansas City District, in the recent case of Robb v. Estate of Brown, 518 S.W.2d 729 (Mo.Ct.App. at K.C. 1974), transfer denied (March 10, 1975). … Your next question is: "(3) How many days for boarding of a prisoner after the completion of a case are considered part of the case proper and chargable against the state by the City of St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 30, 1989

    The court held that this provision expressed the policy of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution as explained in Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1946). … Traub v. Brown, 36 Del. 181 , 172 A. 835 (1934)." Id. 542-543.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2001)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 2001

    Ellis v. Brown , 33 S.W.2d 104 (Mo.banc 1930). Recorders are required to accept certain documents for the recordation and are authorized to collect fees for that function. … The treasurer shall forthwith transmit such fees and interest to the board for deposit in the county employees' retirement fund.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1988

    In State v. … We believe that the opinion of the court in Brown controls in the present circumstance.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 228-77 (1977)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Nov 14, 1977

    Taylor v. Kiburz, 208 S.W.2d 285 (Mo.Banc 1948). Further, the primary purpose of interpretation of a statute is to reach the true legislative intent. State ex rel. Brokaw v. Board of Education of City of St. … Peck Co. v. Brown, 34 Mo. 1189 , 105 S.W.2d 909 (1937); Vol. I, Cooley's Constitutional Limitations (8th ed.), p. 316.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1987)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1987

    distributors, beer line insulation, coil flush hose, couplings, and bucket pumps, portable coil boxes, air pumps, blankets or other coverings for temporary wrappings of barrels, coil box overflow pipes, tilting platforms, bumper boards … Brown-Forman Distillers Corporation v. Stewart, 520 S.W.2d 1 , 7 (Mo. banc 1975). However, this same concern was present when the draught beer exception was enacted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.