Case law

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Board of Education of St. Louis

294 Mo. 106 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1922

[State v. Eckhart, 232 Mo. 49, 53 .] … Moreland, 256 Mo. 683, 692 ; State ex rel. v. Knott, 207 Mo. 167 ; State ex rel. v. Johnson, 138 Mo. App. 306, 313-314 ; 11 C. J. p. 134, par. 96.] The judgment is reversed and tbe cause remanded.

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Board of Education

299 Mo. 465 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1923

Louis, praying for a writ of certiorari commanding the members of the Board of Education and the Superintendent of Instruction of that city to certify the record of Section 1, Rule 47, of the Board of Education of the city … Examination for appointment shall be conducted by the superintendent, under regulations to be made by the board.”

Harrison v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.

607 S.W.2d 137 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1980

V, § 10. … Under the rule of statutory construction that “the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another”, Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

423 S.W.3d 784 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 2014

Brown v. Brown, 362 S.W.3d 508 (Mo.App.2012). In February 2012, Ms. Hendrix filed a motion with the trial court asking the court to order payment of fees to the guardian ad litem for services rendered on appeal. … Niederkorn v.

Thompson v. Committee on Legislative Research

932 S.W.2d 392 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 18, 1996

Buechner v. Bond, 650 S.W.2d 611, 612 (Mo. banc 1983). Every word in a constitutional provision is assumed to have effect and meaning; their use is not meaningless surplusage. Id. at 613 . 5 . Brown v. … See Bohrer v.

Brown v. Brown

45 Mo. 412 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1870

Brown, under a purchase from the latter’s administrator in October, 1855, for the consideration of $2,025. … Ev., § 307; Adams on Eject., by Tillinghast, p. 248; Merchants’ Bank v. Harrison, 39 Mo. 433 .)

Brown v. Brown

124 Mo. 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1894

Farber v. Purdy, 69 Mo. 602 . … Williams v. Hudson, 93 Mo. 224 ; Allen v. McCabe, 93 Mo. 138 .

Brown v. Brown

237 Mo. 662 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 29, 1911

She boarded in reputable families, and had she been forced to make a. deed, she could easily have taken steps to have had it annulled. … We are cited by the plaintiff to the cases of Cadwallader v. West, 48 Mo. 183 ; Martin v. Baker, 135 Mo. 495 , and Dingman v. Romine, 141 Mo. 466 . We are familiar with the doctrines announced in those cases.

Brown v. Brown

676 S.W.2d 519 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 9, 1984

A dissenting judge transferred the case here because of a jurisdictional problem, certifying conflict with Timmings v. Timmings, 628 S.W.2d 724 (Mo.App.1982). … Our authority is circumscribed by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

Brown v. Brown

347 Mo. 45 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 4, 1941

Brown, who is administrator of George -H-. … Wyatt v. Wilhite, 192 Mo. App. 551 , 183 S. W. 1107 ; McLain v. Mercantile Trust Co., supra; Ferguson v.

Brown v. Brown

106 Mo. 611 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

Brown v. Brown

7 Mo. 288 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1842

Opinion of the Court, delivered by Tompkins, Judge„ Both plaintiffs and defendants in this cause, are children of one Henry Brown deceased.

Ruggeri v. City of St. Louis

441 S.W.2d 361 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1969

Passler v. Johnson, Mo., 304 S.W.2d 903, 907 [1]. See also Grant v. Kansas City, Mo., 431 S.W.2d 89 . The City of St. Louis has done so here. We now hold what was forecast in our previous decision in Ruggeri v. … But he is many other things under that charter — e. g., a member of the board of estimate and apportionment, and a member with voice but without vote of the board of aldermen.

Brown ex rel. Clardy v. Brown

47 Mo. 130 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1870

Brown, which they were obliged to discharge. … (Howard v. Coshow, 33 Mo. 118 ; Hargreaves v. Parsons, 13 M. & W. 561; Eastwood v. Kenyon, 11 Ad. & E. 438; Westfall v. Parsons, 16 Barb. 645 ; Barker v. Bucklin, 2 Denio, 45 ; Pratt v. Humphrey, 22 Conn. 317 ; Alger v.

State v. Brown

524 S.W.3d 44 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 2017

V, sec. 10. … Brown of the charged offense of first degree assault because the jury is free to disbelieve the evidence. See Jackson, 433 S.W.3d at 399 ; State v. Randle, 465 S.W.3d 477, 479 (Mo. banc 2015); State v.

Brown v. R. J. Brown Co.

351 Mo. 557 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 27, 1943

Brown was head of the Brown Company, located at St. Louis. … The more sales the Red Bud Company made of that product, the more business the Brown Company would have, because they furnished the product to the Red Bud Company. This is obvious. Teague v.

Brown v. State

66 S.W.3d 721 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 2002

In Brown v. … Brown’s habeas claim also. 7 . This case is thus distinguishable from Brown v.

Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Brown

121 S.W.3d 234 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 2003

Tendai v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 77 S.W.3d 1, 2 (Mo. banc 2002). … See, e.g., Heinen v. Police Personnel Board of Jefferson City, 976 S.W.2d 534, 539 (Mo.App.1998); Holt v. Clarke, 965 S.W.2d 241, 244 (Mo.App.1998).

State v. Brown

337 S.W.3d 12 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 2011

State v. Shurn, 866 S.W.2d 447, 460 (Mo. banc 1993). A prosecutor is allowed to argue the evidence and all reasonable inferences from the evidence during closing arguments. State v. … The limitations on the admissibility of demonstrative evidence are illustrated in, among other cases, State v. Wynne, 353 Mo. 276 , 182 S.W.2d 294 (1944); State v. Grant, 810 S.W.2d 591, 592 (Mo.App.1991); and State v.

State v. Brown

902 S.W.2d 278 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1995

The record clearly indicates that Brown received his warnings under Miranda v. … In State v.