Case law

American Manufacturing Co. v. City of St. Louis

238 Mo. 267 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1911

BROWN, J. … The effect of the case of Brown v.

School District of Oakland v. School District of Joplin

340 Mo. 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1937

[See Harrison v. Bridgeton (1819), 16 Mass. 15 , 17; Richardson v. Brown, (1830), 6 Greenl. (Me.) 355, 359.] The later case of Lynn v. … Board of Health of Buena Vista Township v.

State Ex Rel. Kaysing v. Ryan

334 Mo. 743 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 3, 1934

[Hale v. Stimson, 198 Mo. 134, 145 , 95 S. W. 885 ; Green v. Owen, 38 S. W. (2d) 496 .] … Leake et al. v. Honorable Brown Harris et al., 334 Mo. 713 , 67 S.

R. L. McDonald & Co. v. Hoover

142 Mo. 484 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 1, 1898

Reed v. Pelletier, 28 Mo. 173 ; Burgert v. Borchert, 59 Mo. 80 . … Seger’s Sons v. Thomas Bros., 107 Mo. 635 .

State ex rel. Reid v. Walbridge

119 Mo. 383 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 8, 1894

Laughlin v. Fairbanks, 8 Mo. 370; Wickham v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 . And what the law will imply, is as much part and parcel of a legislative enactment, as though set forth in terms. … State ex rel. v. Board, 108 Mo. 235 ; Sutherland on Stat. Construc., sec. 334, and cases cited.

State Ex Rel. Mutual Life Insurance v. Shain

344 Mo. 276 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1939

Respondents' brief cites Brown v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co. (Banc), 45 Mo. 221 . … Clark v.

State ex rel. McCleary v. Adcock

206 Mo. 550 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 1907

[State ex rel. v. Goodier, 195 Mo. l. c. 560.] … [State ex rel. v. Gregory, 83 Mo. 123 .] If, perchance, through a misunderstanding of the law, the board should refuse to perform a given duty, the writ of mandamus will right the wrong. [State ex rel. v.

State v. Summers

320 Mo. 189 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1928

[State v. Flynn, 258 Mo. 211 , 219, 167 S.W. 516 .] In State v. Brown (Mo.), 296 S.W. 125 , the defendant was charged in separate counts with five distinct felonies. … V.

Kansas City v. Smart

128 Mo. 272 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 30, 1895

Manker v. Faulhaber, 94 Mo. 430 ; State v. Noland, 111 Mo. 484 ; State ex rel. v. Slover, 113 Mo. 202 ; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 119 Mo. 383 . … Louis v.

Pipes v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

267 Mo. 385 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1916

BROWN, C. … [Emerson v. Railway Co., 111 Mo. 161, 165 ; Lore v. Manufacturing Co., 160 Mo. 608, 621 ; McKenzie v. United Railways Co., 216 Mo. 1, 17 ; Railway Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570, 576 ; Railway Co. v. Gray, 237 U.

Urnstein v. Village of Town and Country

368 S.W.2d 390 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1963

Women’s Christian Association of Kansas City v. Brown, 354 Mo. 700 , 190 S.W.2d 900 ; Annotation 9 A.L.R.2d 1039 ; 42 A.L.R.2d 1146 . … Tustin Heights Association v. Board of Supervisors, 170 Cal.App.2d 619 , 339 P.2d 914 .

State ex rel. City of Centralia v. Wilder

211 Mo. 305 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1908

[Eichenlaub v. St. Joseph, 113 Mo. l. c. 402.] … [Graham v. City of Carondelet, 33 Mo. 262 .]

Little Tarkio Drainage District No. One v. Richardson

237 Mo. 49 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1911

[Newby v. Platte Co., 25 Mo. 258 ; Daugherty v. Brown, 92 Mo. 26 ; Lingo v. Burford, 112 Mo. 119 ; Wolters v. City of St. Louis, 132 Mo. 1 ; Bennett v. Woody, 137 Mo. 377 ; City of St. Joseph v. … [Newby v. Platt County, supra; Daugherty v. Brown, supra; Lingo v. Burford, supra; Wolters v. City of St. Louis, supra.] There is no merit in this contention.

Peters v. Board of Education of the Reorganized School District No. 5 of St. Charles County

506 S.W.2d 429 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1974

Louis Teachers Association v. Board of Education, 467 S.W.2d 283 (Mo.App. 1971). In the St. … That right was clearly established in Clouse and in Bergmann v. The Board of Education [ 360 Mo. 644 ], 230 S.W.2d 714 (Mo.1950).”

State ex rel. Titus v. Wabash Railroad

206 Mo. 251 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1907

[State ex rel. v. School Board, 131 Mo. l. c. 514; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 86 Mo. 13 ; State ex rel. v. Francis, 95 Mo. 44 .] This proposition, however, does not seem to be seriously disputed by defendant. *259 II. … Railroad, 86 Mo. 13 ; Dubach v. Railroad, 89 Mo. 483 ; Brown v. Railroad, 137 Mo. 529 ; State ex rel. v. Murphy, 134 Mo. l. c. 562; Knapp, Stout & Co. v. Railroad, 126 Mo. l. c. 37; Corby v.

Kammerer v. Missouri Valley College

327 S.W.2d 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 13, 1959

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 126 N.J.Eq. 406, 9 A.2d 311 , loc. cit. 330. … In Presbyterian Orphanage of Missouri v. Fitterling, 342 Mo. 299 , 114 S.W.2d 1004 , Citizens’ Bank of Lancaster v. Foglesong, 326 Mo. 581 , 31 S.W.2d 778 , and Cook v.

State v. Murray

126 Mo. 611 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1895

Commonwealth v. Brown, 121 Mass. 69 ; Murphy v. State, 36 Ohio St. 628 ; Kelley v. People, 55 N. Y. 565 ; People v. Wentz, 37 N. Y. 303 ; M’Kee v. People, 36 N. Y. 113 ; Commonwealth v. Crocker, 108 Mass. 464 . … State v. Orrick, 106 Mo. 127; State v. Steifel, 106 Mo. 129 ; State v. Sansone, 116 Mo. 11 ; State v. Howell, 117 Mo. 341 ; State v. Avery, 113 Mo. 475 .

Waller v. Oliver

296 S.W.2d 44 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1956

As stated in Hertz v. … Combs v.

State v. Williams

486 S.W.2d 468 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1972

State, 3 Md.App. 563 , 240 A.2d 332 ; Brown v. Heyd, E.D.La., 277 F.Supp. 899 . … Sperling v. Fitzpatrick, 2 Cir., 426 F.2d 1161, 1164 [5]. See also Brown v. Kearney, 5 Cir., 355 F.2d 199, 200 ; Martin v. United States, 4 Cir., 183 F.2d 436, 439 ; United States v. Hallman, 3 Cir., 365 F.2d 289, 291 .

Town of Otterville v. Bente

240 Mo. 291 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 27, 1912

[Reid v. Board of Education, 73 Mo. l. c. 304; Becker v. St. Charles, 37 Mo. l. c. 18; Brown v. Carthage, 128 Mo. l. c. 17.] … [Heitz v. St. Louis, 110 Mo. l. c. 624, 625; Railroad v. Baker, 183 Mo. l. c. 322; Indianapolis v. Kingsbury, 101 Ind. l. c. 212, and cases cited; Stetson v. Dow, 16 Gray, 372 .] II.