Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.61s
187 Mo. 698 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1905
S. 1899, sec. 8195; Barton Co. v. Walser, 47 Mo. 197 ; Pool v. Brown, 98 Mo. 675 ; Simpson v. Stoddard Co., 173 Mo. 421 .] … In Bartlett v.
Cited 6 timesPublished244 Mo. 329 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 26, 1912
Gantt v. John C. Brown, and Henry 0. Timmonds v. John Kennish) on other offices. He qualified, took upon himself and well performed the duties prescribed by our order. … [Vide, Gantt v. Brown, 238 Mo. 560 .] It is of little avail to do so vain and inutile a thing as to tread back in our tracks to dispose of moot questions.
Cited 14 timesPublishedCannamore v. Bi-State Development Agency
484 S.W.2d 308 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 17, 1972
In Missouri, courts have approved the application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine to establish negligence in a situation wherein a passenger was boarding or *311 alighting from a bus. For instance, see White v. St. … See Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublished234 Mo. 276 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 11, 1911
[Wharton’s Criminal Law (10 Ed.) , sec. 27; State v. Smith, 190 Mo. l. c. 720.] There is no impropriety about joining the charge of rape and incest where they both relate to the same transaction. [State v. … [State v. Goodale, 210 Mo. 275 , l. c. 290; State v. Brown, 209 Mo. 413 .]
Cited 31 timesPublished89 S.W.3d 447 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 2002
Petition of Board of Public Buildings, 363 S.W.2d 598, 608 (Mo. banc 1962). … Nixon v. Kinder and Brown, 89 S.W.3d 454 (Mo. banc 2002) also decided this date. 4 . That appeal actually involved two underlying cases, State ex rel. Utility Consumers Council of Missouri, Inc., v.
Cited 69 timesPublished112 Mo. 390 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 29, 1892
Brown v. Swineford, 44 Wis. 282 . … Brown v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 588 ; Sidekum v. Railroad, 93 Mo. 400 ; Ritter v. Bank, 87 Mo. 574 ; State v. Barham, 82 Mo. 67 ; Haynes v. Trenton, 108 Mo. 123 .
Cited 26 timesPublishedJessica Chavez v. Cedar Fair, LP
450 S.W.3d 291 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 2014
V, sec. 10. … Gromowsky v. Ingersol, 241 S.W.2d 60, 63 (Mo.App.1951); Cooper v. Winnwood Amusement Co., 227 Mo.App. 608 , 55 S.W.2d 737, 742 (1932); Brown v. Winnwood Amusement Co., 225 Mo.App. 1180 , 34 S.W.2d 149, 152 (1931). Ms.
Cited 19 timesPublished251 Mo. 624 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 1913
BROWN. … Louis, 112 Mo. 138 , and cases cited; Cassidy v. St.
Cited 4 timesPublished310 Mo. 526 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 7, 1925
Orr v. … [State v. Callaway Co., 43 Mo. 228 .] Section 8, article 9, page 106, Laws 1873, expressly authorizes such board to draw an order (or warrant) on the trustee for the amount allowed by them. ’ ’ Even in State ex rel. v.
Cited 11 timesPublished264 Mo. 646 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 1, 1915
[State ex rel. v. Kinney, 48 Mo. 374 ; State ex rel. v. Tracy, 94 Mo. 217 ; Cape Girardeau v. Riley, 72 Mo. 220 ; Aurora v. McGannon, 138 Mo. 38 ; State ex rel. v. Ashbrook, 154 Mo. 375 .] ... … Brown, G., concurs. PER CURIAM. — The foregoing opinion of Bailey, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState ex rel. Bell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
236 Mo. 352 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1911
Thompson, 64 Tex. 690 ; State v. Travis County, 85 Tex. 435 ; State v. Burkeholder, 30 W. Va. 593 . In the case of Brown v. … [Mueller v. Kaessmann, 84 Mo. 318 ; Cruchon v. Brown, 57 Mo. 38 ; Weil v. Simmons, 66 Mo. 617 ; McClanahan v. West, 100 Mo. 309 ; Hunt v. Railroad, 89 Mo. 607 .]
Cited 10 timesPublished349 Mo. 662 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1942
State v. Brown, 342 Mo. 53 , 57[3], 112 S.W.2d 568 , 571[4, 5]; State v. Wright, 342 Mo. 58 , 63, 112 S.W.2d 571 , 575[12]; State v. Boyer, 342 Mo. 64 , 75[14], 112 S.W.2d 575 , 582[16]; State v. … [State v. Shehane, 25 Mo. 565 .] Pending the appeal in State v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Sessions v. Bartle
359 S.W.2d 716 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 10, 1962
Brown, decided by that court on November 12, 1942, reported in 350 Mo. 256 , 165 S.W.2d 657 . … Louis as fixed by an ordinance enacted by the Board of Aldermen of the city.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of St. Louis
183 Mo. 230 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 22, 1904
Assn.; in city block No. 2179a, lot 7, Rebecca Willi Brown. … As was said in *236 Collier Estate v. Western Paving & Supply Company, and Kauffman v.
Cited 8 timesPublished337 Mo. 799 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 3, 1935
Hussman v. St. … In State ex rel. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDyer v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Co.
378 S.W.2d 570 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1964
Roy Browning which “wound up in Orville E. Hodge’s ‘brown envelope account’ in Edward Hintz’s desk at the Southmoor Bank.” … Roy Browning to assist in getting a bill passed in the Illinois legislature. The ¡¡>¡15,000 fee paid to Browning “wound up” in the pocket of Orville E.
Cited 36 timesPublishedState ex rel. Spillers v. Johnston
214 Mo. 656 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1908
[City of New Orleans v. Arthurs, 36 La. Ann. 98 .] In Carter v. Patterson, 39 S. W. … (c) If the Constitution or statute had excluded from tax exemption pay private schools or military boarding schools, another ease would be here, But as the language of the exemption undeniably includes boarding schools, we
Overruled — as noted by a later courtCited 47 timesPublishedBoard of President of the St. Louis Public School v. Estate of Broadway Savings Bank
84 Mo. 56 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884
Cited 5 timesPublished229 Mo. 27 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1910
[Bronson v. Wanzer, 86 Mo. 408 ; Keithley v. Keithley, 85 Mo. 217 .] It has been held that the verdict of a jury in such case is not a subject for examination on an appeal. [Weeks v. Senden, 54 Mo. 129 .] … Davis and Browning boarded at the same hotel, a pleasant social acquaintance sprang up between them, visits and social pleasures were exchanged between them and their wives.
Cited 8 timesPublishedYellow Freight Systems, Inc. v. Mayor's Commission on Human Rights of Springfield
791 S.W.2d 382 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1990
XV, § 15.1, provides: “All boards or commissions established by this Charter or under authority granted herein to the council shall be classified either as (1) advisory boards, established for the purposes of investigation … Brown v. Morris, 365 Mo. 946, 955 , 290 S.W.2d 160, 166 (banc 1956).
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna