Case law

Beatty v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

700 S.W.2d 831 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 21, 1985

In Prokopf v. … State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Mo. banc 1983). The election contest statutes do not clearly and undoubtedly violate the law. Appellant’s due process claim is without merit. III.

State ex rel. Teare v. Dungan

265 Mo. 353 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1915

In State ex rel. v. … J., and Woodson, J., concur; Blair, J., concurs in result; Bond, J., concurs with the modification endorsed by Brown, G.

Hannibal v. Marion County

36 Mo. 294 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1865

(Hodgson v. Dexter, 1 Cranch, 345 ; Tutt v. Hobbs, 17 Mo. 486 . … In Bissel v.

Turner v. Browne

351 Mo. 541 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 20, 1943

Browne, Nell C. Browne, and Clifford B. … Browne and took no part in the operation of said company; that the said defendants as members of the Board of Directors acquiesced in and consented to and ratified all the actions of the defendant T.G.

Donahoe v. Kansas City

136 Mo. 657 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 19, 1897

Murtaugh v. St. Louis, 44 Mo. 479 ; Hannon v. St. Louis County, 62 Mo. 313 ; Armstrong v. Brunswick, 79 Mo. 319 ; Kiley v. Kansas City, 87 Mo. 103 ; Carrington v. St. Louis, 89 Mo. 208 ; Keat *665 ing v. … Moore v. Railroad, 85 Mo. 594 ; Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 58 ; Dayharsh v. Railroad, 103 Mo. 570 ; Mulcairns v. Janesville, 67 Wis. 24 ; Miller v. Railroad, 109 Mo. 350 ; Russ v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 45 ; Sullivan v.

City of St. Louis v. Flynn

128 Mo. 413 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 21, 1895

This notice was legally served, but Flynn did not appear, and the board of health, it appears, attempted to act in his absence, as appears by the following record of the board read in evidence by the clerk of the board: * … This service was held void in Stewart v. Stringer, 41 Mo. 400 , and similar rulings have been made in Brown v. Langlois, 70 Mo. 226 ; Bank v. Suman, 79 Mo. 530 ; Laney v. Garbee, 105 Mo. 355 .

State Ex Rel. Curators of the University of Missouri v. Neill

397 S.W.2d 666 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 10, 1966

Baker v. … Heimberger v. Board of Curators, 268 Mo. 598 , 188 S.W. 128 .

Pipe Fabricators, Inc. v. Director of Revenue

654 S.W.2d 74 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1983

V, § 3. … Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 (Mo. banc 1983); State ex rel. Conversation Commission v. LePage, 566 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Mo. banc 1978).

State ex rel. St. Joseph Water Co. v. Geiger

246 Mo. 74 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 1912

Waterworks Co., 95 Iowa, 348 ; Mayor, etc., of City of Birmingham v. Birmingham Water Co., 42 So. (Ala.) 10; Indiana Ry. Co. v. Hoffman, 161 Ind. 593 ; People v. Detroit United Ry., 162 Mich. 460 .] In the St. … Co. v.

Davenport v. King Electric Co.

242 Mo. 111 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1912

Jefferson, 77 Mo. l. c. 138; State v. Doyle, 107 Mo. l. c. 42; State v. Nelson, 132 Mo. 184 ; State v. Brown, 209 Mo. l. c. 419; State v. … [Geismann *124 v. Mo. Edison Elec. Co., 173 Mo. l. c. 674; Young v. Waters-Pierce Oil Co., 185 Mo. l. c. 664; Ryan v. St. L. Transit Co., 190 Mo. l. c. 634; Von Trebra v. Gaslight Co., 209 Mo. l. c. 659; Clark v.

Judson v. Mullinax

145 Mo. 630 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 17, 1898

fence,” which said post and board fence com- *0 *633 menced at the south end of said lot 12 at a point seventeen feet five inches east of the southwest corner and runs thence northerly to the north line of said lot 12 and … Sweet v. Owens, 109 Mo. 1 ; Bartlett v. Brown, 121 Mo. 353 . Pully concurring in the -judgment of the circuit court it is affirmed. Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

Deckard v. Chairman of the State Division of Parole

471 S.W.2d 480 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 11, 1971

See Bullock v. Mississippi, 5th Cir., 404 F.2d 75 and cases cited and also citations in Brown v. State, Mo., 452 S.W.2d 176 . The principle was established by Ponzi v. … Since the time of State v.

Croy v. Zalma Reorganized School District R-V of Bollinger County

434 S.W.2d 517 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1968

Board of County Com’rs of Delta County v. … Brown v. Fagan, 71 Mo. 563 ; Barrett, Fitch, North & Co. v. Hudson, Mo.App., 403 S.W.2d 944, 947 [2]. The court properly refused to reform this quitclaim deed.

State Ex Rel. Motor Serv. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.

339 Mo. 469 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 2, 1936

This conclusion, we think, finds support, in principle, in Brown Bennett v. Powers, 146 Iowa 729 . … In Brown Bennett v.

Missouri Township in Chariton County v. Farmers Bank of Forest Green

328 Mo. 868 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 1, 1931

[Brown v. Irving-Pitt Mfg. Co., 292 S.W. 1023 .] The finding of facts made by the trial court, as above quoted, is supported by the greater weight of the evidence. … The only case cited in the briefs, by appellant and respondent, in point on the facts presented, is Hartford v. American National Bank, 49 Conn. 539 . This case is cited in appellant's reply brief.

State v. Garrett

627 S.W.2d 635 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1982

Carter v. Jury Commission, 396 U.S. 320, 332 , 90 S.Ct. 518, 524 , 24 L.Ed.2d 549 (1970); Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 474 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 416 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953). The legislature by statute has directed that in St. … A similar problem and consistent result may be found in Brown v. Bryan, 419 S.W.2d 62 (Mo.1967).

Hornbuckle v. McCarty

295 Mo. 162 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 27, 1922

[Aronson v. Ricker, supra; Holmes v. Railroad, 207 Mo. 149 , 163.] … Small, C., concurs; Brown, C., absent.

City of Tarkio v. Clark

186 Mo. 285 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1905

A petition was presented to the board of aldermen of the city of Tarkio numerously signed by citizens and praying the widening and extension of First street, and a resolution was passed by the board requiring said street … Corp. (4 Ed.), sec. 607; Railroad v. Young, 96 Mo. 39 ; Zimmerman v. Snowden, 88 Mo. 218 ; Daugherty v. Brown, 91 Mo. 26 ; Sedalia v. Gallie, 49 Mo. App. 392 .]

Cox v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad

335 Mo. 1226 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 16, 1934

[O'Leary v. Scullin Steel Co., 303 Mo. 363 , 260 S.W. 55 .] In Kimmie v. … [See, also, Plank v. R.J. Brown Petroleum Co., 332 Mo. 1150 , 61 S.W.2d 328 ; Bante v. Wells (Mo. App.), 34 S.W.2d 980 , and cases cited.] . . .

Town of Canton v. McDaniel

188 Mo. 207 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 25, 1905

[State v. Raymond, 156 Mo. 118 ; Kirkwood v. Meramec Highlands Co., 160 Mo. 111 .] … [Baker v. Railroad, 122 Mo. 533 ; Christian v. Ins. Co., 143 Mo. l. c. 468; Flowers v. Helm, 29 Mo. 324 ; State v. Frazier, 137 Mo. 317 ; R. S. 1899, sec. 2535.] III.