Case law

State v. Johnson

333 Mo. 1008 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 19, 1933

They are, State v. Carlisle, 57 Mo. 102 ; State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 , 16 S.W. 406 ; State v. Wisdom, 119 Mo. 539 , 24 S.W. 1047 . … The instruction considered in the Brown case was not copied in the opinion.

State ex rel. Mosconi v. Maroney

191 Mo. 531 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1905

App., the Court of Appeals, in State ex rel. v. Brown, 57 Mo. … [Laughlin v. Fairbanks, 8 Mo. 370 ; Wickham v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 .] And what the law will imply, is as much part and parcel of a legislative enactment, as though set forth in terms.

Nelson v. Waxman

9 S.W.3d 601 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 2000

Vinjamuri, 19 F.3d 1274 (8th Cir.1994) (affirming trial court’s order excluding evidence that defendant failed board exam); Jackson v. Buchman, 338 Ark. 467 , 996 S.W.2d 30 (1999) (same); Gipson v. … Brown, appellants’ expert, when he was contacted with regard to this case.

State ex rel. Board of Education v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.

74 Mo. 163 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881

Joseph Board of Public Schools v. … Joseph Board of Pub. Schools v. Patton, was held to require legislation to en *167 force it.

State Ex Rel. McDonald v. Lollis

326 Mo. 644 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 21, 1930

In State ex inf. v. Duncan, 265 Mo. 26, 45 , 175 S. … Lim. (7 Ed.) 247; State ex rel. v. Gordon, 236 Mo. l. c. 171; State ex rel. v. Taylor, 224 Mo. l. c. 474; State v.

Cook v. Higgins

290 Mo. 402 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1921

Brown was to board him, that he was to do the chores about the house and farm, perform such duties as Mrs. Brown was unable to perform, and generally look after her and the place. … Brown. [Ennis v. Burnham, 159 Mo. 494 ; Martin v. Baker, 135 Mo. 495 ; McClure v. Lewis, 72 Mo. 314 ; Ryan v. Ryan, 174 Mo. 279 ; Mowry v. Kettering, 204 Mo. 173 ; Byrne v. Byrne, 250 Mo. 632 .] Undue Influence.

Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. American Taxicabs, Inc.

344 Mo. 1200 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 7, 1939

Brown had been engaged in the taxicab business in St. Louis for many years prior to 1934. From 1917 to 1924, he operated the Brown Cab Company which used cabs brown in color. … Defendant Brown was employed as general manager of the New Company.

Mullins v. Mount Saint Mary's Cemetery Ass'n

239 Mo. 681 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 6, 1912

[City of Clinton to use v. Henry County, 115 Mo. 557 ; St. Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 561 ; Inhabitants v. Mayor, 116 Mass. 193 ; City of Atlanta v. First Presbyterian Church, 86 Ga. 730 .] In the case of Clinton to use v. … Ferriss and Brown, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Webster Groves Sanitary Sewer District v. Smith

337 Mo. 855 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 7, 1935

“Thereafter, said Moore, Goodloe and Brown did qualify, as required by law, and organized the Board of Trustees for said district by electing said Moore as president thereof, said Goodloe as treasurer, and said Brown as secretary … Lynn v. The Board of Education, 141 Mo. 45 , 41 S. W. 924 , in support of this provision of the act. In that case the same objection was made to an act of the Legislature requiring the city of St.

State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Tegethoff

338 Mo. 328 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 9, 1936

Gen., v. Patterson, 229 Mo. 364 , 129 S. W. 894 , and State ex rel. Major, *333 Atty. Gen., v. Patterson, 229 Mo. 373, 381, 391 , 129 S. W. 888, 889, 892 . … Sears v. Hall, 325 Mo. 321, 325 , 28 S.

La Grange Reorganized School District No. R-VI v. Smith

312 S.W.2d 135 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1958

R-VI, successor to the Walnut *137 Grove School District, instituted this action against the appellant, Noel Smith, and the unknown heirs and devisees of Sewellyn Brown and others. Mr. … No. 4 v. Glandon, supra; Feeler v. Reorganized Dist. No. 4, supra.

State Ex Rel. MacKey v. Hyde

315 Mo. 681 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 6, 1926

This discretion has been exercised in this jurisdiction by empowering the former Board of Railway and Warehouse Commissioners to fix fees for the inspection and weighing of grain (Mer. Exchange v. … Brown v. McIntosh, 205 Mo. 616 , the question arose and was determined as to the right of one to practice the vocation of dentistry free from the regulation of a state board.

Reed v. Cooke

331 Mo. 507 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 3, 1932

In Metropolitan Paving Co. v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co., 309 Mo. 638, 664 , 274 S. W. 815, 823 , this court said: “A promise to do-a certain thing, with a present intention not to do it, is not actionable.” … [See, also, Estes v. Desnoyers Shoe Co., 155 Mo. 577 , 56 S. W. 316 ; Shoup v. Tanner-Buick Co., supra; Mathews v. Eby, 149 Mo. App. 157 and Hockley v. Hulet’ Bros. Storage Co. (Mo. App.), 16 S. W. (2d) 749 .]

Security State Bank v. Simmons

251 Mo. 2 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1913

BROWN, C. Suit on Notes. … Shoe Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Holman v. Trimble

316 Mo. 1041 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1927

See also State ex rel. v. Meeker, 182 Ind. 240 , 105 N. E. 906 ; City of Paducah v. Board, 146 Ky. 636 , 143 S. W. 1 ; Lovelady v. Loveman, 191 Ala. 96 , 68 So. 48 ; Jobe v. Caldwell & Drake, 93 Ark. 503 , 125 S. … In State ex rel. v. Brown, 72 Mo. App. 651 , the Sheriff of the City of St. Louis was allowed per diem compensation for himself and his deputies.

Gross v. Atchison County

320 Mo. 332 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 21, 1928

Musser v. Birch, 186 Mo. l. c. 215. … [State v. Gross, 275 S. W. (Mo.) 769; State v. Wilson, 265 Mo. l. c. 9; State v. Streutker, 288 Mo. 156 , 231 S. W. 565 ; State v. Hoeffner, 124 Mo. 488 ; State v. Heed, 62 Mo. 559 .]

Hillig v. City of St. Louis

337 Mo. 291 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 10, 1935

The challenged Ordinance No. 40179 was duly enacted by the board of aldermen of the city of St. Louis and was approved by the mayor on November 9, 1933. … [Curtice v. Schmidt, 202 Mo. 703 , 101 S. W. 61 ; Shoenberg v. Field, 95 Mo. App. 241 , 68 S. W. 945 ; St. Louis Quarry & Construction Co. v. Von Versen, 81 Mo. App. 519 ; St. Louis Quarry & Construction Co. v.

Wilson v. Purl

148 Mo. 449 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 7, 1899

Brown and George P. … on October 4, 1881; but unfortunately for defendant, in courts where things practiced are considered, such a mental inclosure, built in the town offices of a land grabber is not an adequate substitute for boards, barbed

State ex rel. Von Stade v. Taylor

220 Mo. 618 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1909

Francis, 88 Mo. 557 , and Ex parte Arnold, 128 Mo. 256 , and State ex rel. v. Spencer, 164 Mo. 23 ; Windes v. Nelson, 159 Mo. 76 ; State ex rel. v. Board of Public Schools, 112 Mo. 213 ; Montgomery v. … Cicott, 16 Mich. 283 , and the Supreme Court of California in Ex parte Brown, 97 Cal. 83 .

Strother v. Kansas City Milling Co.

261 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1914

For example: Hollweg v. Telephone Co., 195 Mo. l. c. 156 et seq., and cases cited: Russ v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 45 ; Burkard v. Rope Co., 217 Mo. l. c. 480 et seq.; Bien v. Transit Co., 108 Mo. App. 399 ; Dayharsh v. … .; Miller v. Railroad, 109 Mo. l. c. 356 et seq.; • McIntyre v. Tebbetts, 257 Mo. 117 .