Case law

George v. St. Louis Manufacturing Co.

159 Mo. 333 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1900

This machine planed the two sides of a board at the same time, as it passed through, by means of two sets of knives .revolving rapidly one above the other below the board. … Not three weeks before that, another man had been hurt there, and I took a stick to remove the clog, and I was thinking about myself, ‘If only you don’t — nothing happens to you as it did to Charley Brown,’ and at that moment

Firebaugh v. Stone

36 Mo. 111 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1865

(Ashby v. Watson, 9 Mo. 286 ; Beach v. Viles, 2 Pet. 675 .)

Yerington v. Riss

374 S.W.2d 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 13, 1964

Plaintiff relies primarily on Metropolitan Paving Co. v. Brown-Crummer Inv. … Brown-Crummer Inv. Co., supra, the principal case relied on by plaintiff.

State ex rel. Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Tracy

94 Mo. 217 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1887

Heller v. Stremmel, 52 Mo. 311 ; Roach v. St. Louis Public Schools, 77 Mo. 484 . … The Board of President and Directors of the St.

Big Tarkio Drainage District v. Voltmer

256 Mo. 152 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 24, 1914

[State ex rel. v. Wilson, 216 Mo. 215 ; Tarkio Drainage District v. Richardson, 237 Mo. 49 ; Drainage District v. Tomlinson, 245 Mo. 1 .] … [State v. Bulling, 100 Mo. 87 ; Brown v. Woody, 64 Mo. 547 ; State ex rel. v. Nixon, 232 Mo. 496 .] We are aware that in Tarkio Drainage District v.

Cooper v. Johnson

81 Mo. 483 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1884

As to the first of the above named objections to the instructions in McManus v. … In Brown v.

Union National Bank v. Lyons

220 Mo. 538 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1909

[Gwin v. Smurr, 101 Mo. 550 ; Craig v. VanBebber, 100 Mo. 584 ; Brown v. Miller, 46 Mo. App. 1 .] “The mere statement of this case readily suggests its decision. … The same principle involved in this case Was involved in the case of Binion v. Browning, 26 Mo. 270 .

Hovey v. Sauer

50 Mo. 301 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1872

State v. Ellis

294 Mo. 269 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1922

[State v. Jackson, 186 S.W. (Mo.) 990; State v. Moore, 225 S.W. (Mo.) 924; State v. Gulley, 272 Mo. 484 , 199 S.W. 124 ; State v. Brown, 234 S.W. 785 .] II. … Brown, 73 Mo. 631 .]

Nelson v. Waxman

9 S.W.3d 601 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 2000

Vinjamuri, 19 F.3d 1274 (8th Cir.1994) (affirming trial court’s order excluding evidence that defendant failed board exam); Jackson v. Buchman, 338 Ark. 467 , 996 S.W.2d 30 (1999) (same); Gipson v. … Brown, appellants’ expert, when he was contacted with regard to this case.

State ex rel. Union Pacific Railroad v. Dierker

961 S.W.2d 816 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 27, 1998

In Brown v. Missouri Pacific R.R. … See Brown v. Missouri Pacific R.R. Co., 720 S.W.2d at 360 .

State v. Johnson

333 Mo. 1008 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 19, 1933

They are, State v. Carlisle, 57 Mo. 102 ; State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 , 16 S.W. 406 ; State v. Wisdom, 119 Mo. 539 , 24 S.W. 1047 . … The instruction considered in the Brown case was not copied in the opinion.

State ex rel. Collet v. Scopel

316 S.W.2d 515 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1958

Cooper, 147 Kan. 710 , 78 P.2d 884, 888 ; Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Lensgraf, La.App., 101 So.2d 734, 736 ; Board of Medical Examiners of Utah v. … Blair, 57 Utah 516 , 196 P. 221 ; State Board of Dental Examiners v. Rymer, Tenn., 303 S.W.2d 959 ; State v.

Jablonowski v. Modern Cap Manufacturing Co.

312 Mo. 173 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1925

In Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. l. c. 71, we said: ‘The instruction on the measure of damages is also assailed as’ error. … [Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 ; Matthews v. Railroad, 142 Mo. 645 ; Barth v. Street Ry., 142 Mo. 535 .] “In Boettger v.

State Ex Rel. Horspool v. Haid

328 Mo. 327 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1931

The case upon which respondents rely, State ex rel. v. Becker, 293 S. … It was the scaffold boards which fell — not the lookouts, nor the upright. The ruling of the Court of Appeals that a case was made for the jury is in conflict with Williams v. Ransom, 234 Mo. l. c. 69; Forbes v.

Gentry v. Gentry

122 Mo. 202 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 1894

In Agan v. … v.

State Ex Rel. Electric Household Stores, Inc. v. Hostetter

338 Mo. 79 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1935

W. 359 ; Fidelity National Bank v. D. G. Co., 293 Mo. 194 , 238 S. W. 474 ; Tucker v. St. Louis, etc., Railroad Co., 54 Mo. 117 ; Mayberry v. Chicago, etc., Railroad Co., 75 Mo. 492 , and Brown v. M., K. & T. … There was no evidence to show specific authority on the part of the surgeon to contract for board and nursing bills. In Brown v.

State v. Gordon

253 Mo. 510 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1913

[State v. Spaugh, 200 Mo. 571 , l. c. 594; State v. Bell, 212 Mo. 111 ; State v. Collins, 181 Mo. 235 , l. c. 260.] … [State v. Griffen, 87 Mo. 608 ; State v. Allen, 174 Mo. 689 ; State v. Rasco, 239 Mo. 535 .]

Spradling v. SSM Health Care St. Louis

313 S.W.3d 683 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 2010

See Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Servs., Inc., 807 S.W.2d 503, 506 (Mo. banc 1991). 5 . In Fields v. … Brown v. Shaw, 129 S.W.3d 372, 373 (Mo. banc 2004).

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Walden

332 Mo. 680 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 20, 1933

Van Raalte et al. v. Board of Equalization, 256 Mo. 455 , 461, 165 S.W. 1047 ; State ex rel. Johnson v. … Hamilton v. Brown, 172 Mo. 374 , 72 S.W. 640 , cited by appellants, is not in point.