Case law

Moore v. Board of Regents for the Normal School in Distinct Number Two

215 Mo. 705 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 4, 1909

[Thompson v. Allsman, 7 Mo. 531 ; Lee v. Ashbrook, 14 Mo. 379 ; Marsh v. Richards, 29 Mo. 105 ; Yeats v. Ballentine, 56 Mo. 530 ; Williams v. Railroad, 112 Mo. l. c. 498.] … [Bean v. Miller, 69 Mo. 384 ; Halpin v. Manny, 57 Mo. App. 59 .]

Schide v. Gottschick

329 Mo. 64 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1931

When the women passengers boarded the elevator at the first floor Brown was stationed in the position usually occupied by the operator and apparently in charge of the elevator. … [Smart v. Kansas City, 208 Mo. 162 , 105 S.W. 709 ; Kiefer v. City of St. Joseph, 243 S.W. ( Mo. Sup.) 104 ; Maloney v. United Rys. Co., 237 S.W. ( Mo. Sup.) 509 ; Gillogly v. Dunham, 187 Mo.

Gaddy v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts of Missouri

394 S.W.2d 284 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 26, 1965

The party involved is the Board which is an artificial legal entity in the nature of a quasi public corporation. See State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Day, 327 Mo. 122 , 35 S.W.2d 37 ; State ex rel. Gehrs v. … Lentine v. State Board of Health, 334 Mo. 220 , 65 S.W.2d 943 , which however did not involve such a legal entity. See Secs. 9013-9023, RS 1929.

Millsap v. Quinn

785 S.W.2d 82 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1990

City of Ladue v. St. Louis City/County Board of Freeholders, Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Cause No. 589490. … IX, § 1(a) (1945), stating that "[s]eparate schools shall be provided for white and colored children,” was unconstitutional following the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Brown v.

Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. Morse

356 Mo. 336 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1947

Compare Selleck v. Hawley, 331 Mo. 1038 , 56 S. W. (2d) 387 . … Such a case is Dumaine v. Dumaine, 301 Mass. 214 , 16 N.

State v. Adams

316 Mo. 157 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1926

[State v. Foster, 136 Mo. l.c. 655; State v. Brown, 119 Mo. 527 ; State v. Meyers, 99 Mo. l.c. 112-13, and cases cited.] III. … [State v. Brown, 267 S.W. 871 ; State v. Meyer, 293 Mo. 108 ; State v. McNeal, 237 S.W. 738 ; State v. Hart, 292 Mo. 74 ; State v. Lee, 288 Mo. 41 .] VI.

State v. Daly

210 Mo. 664 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 31, 1908

In State v. … [State v. Hopkirk, 84 Mo. 278 .] In State v.

Motsinger v. Queen City Casket Company

408 S.W.2d 857 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1966

Brown claimed the skid marks made by his truck were not more than 50 to 100 feet in length. … Wolfe, Special Judge, in the case of Lea-thern v. Longenecker, 405 S.W.2d 873 . What the Court said in that opinion supports our conclusion.

Schrewe v. Sanders

498 S.W.2d 775 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 10, 1973

Brown v. Griesedieck Western Brewing Co., 250 S.W.2d 803, 809 [3, 4] (Mo.App. 1952). In Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. … Wasem v. Missouri Dental Board, 405 S.W.2d 492, 496 (Mo.App. 1966).

State Ex Rel. McMillian v. Guinn

309 Mo. 291 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1925

[Williams v. Bank, 72 Mo. 292 ; Scott v. Bailey, 23 Mo. 140 ; State v. Hockaday, 98 Mo. 590 .] … Timbrook, 240 Mo. 226 ; State ex rel. v. Phillips, 137 Mo. 259 , l. c. 265; State ex rel. v. Wilson, 216 Mo. 215 , l. c. 286.] State ex rel. v. Brown, 172 Mo. 374 , and State ex rel. v.

State Ex Rel. Woodmansee v. Ridge

343 Mo. 702 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1938

Dawson v. St. … In State ex rel. v. Brown, No. 30,665, 326 Mo. 627 , 33 S. W. (2d) 104 , and a companion cause of the same title, but numbered No. 30,666, 326 Mo. 637 , 33 S.

Rentschler v. Nixon

311 S.W.3d 783 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 11, 2010

Hagely v. Board of Educ. of Webster Groves School Dist. 841 S.W.2d 663, 669 (Mo. banc 1992). … Brown, 308 Mont. 265 , 42 P.3d 760, 763 (2002); Franklin County v. Burdick, 103 N.C.App. 496 , 405 S.E.2d 783, 785 (1991).

State v. McMahon

234 Mo. 611 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 23, 1911

[Manz v. Railway Company, 8 Mo. 278 ; State v. McCance, 110 Mo. 398 ; State v. Schuchmann, 138 Mo. 111 ; State v. Howard, 137 Mo. 289 .] … Ferriss, J., and Brown, J., concur.

Big Lake Drainage District v. Rolwing

269 Mo. 161 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 5, 1916

The facts presented and the points ruled on in the first appeal are set out in In re Big Lake Drainage District; Marshall et al., Appellants, v. B. C. Rolwing, 265 Mo. 450 . … Lindsay Brown, Secretary, was signed, and a blank space left for the signature of the president. *169 The ruling of the learned circuit judge in excluding this corrected record was erroneous, since there was nothing in the

State v. Weber

156 Mo. 257 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 8, 1900

[State v. Brown, 75 Mo. 317 ; State v. Butterfield, 75 Mo. 297 ; State v. Sharp, 106 Mo. 106 .] … And in State v. Jake, 2 Winst. 80 (N.

State ex rel. Blades v. Wabash Railroad

251 Mo. 134 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1913

BROWN, P. J. Action to collect railroad taxes. Prom a judgment for plaintiff in the circuit court of Montgomery county, defendant appeals. … In the case of Wilkinson v.

State ex rel. School District No. 3 v. Mayview Board of Education

65 Mo. 587 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1877

This precise question was decided in the affirmative in the case of The State v. Appleton City, 53 Mo. 127 , and that case is decisive of this.

Lockwood v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

47 Mo. 50 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1870

In Brown v. Railway P. Ins. … In such a policy it would *53 be necessary for the insured to show the goods on board and the amount he was to receive for their transportation.

Hiltner v. Kansas City

293 S.W.2d 422 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1956

See also Emery v. Thompson, 347 Mo. 494 , 148 S.W.2d 479, 480 ; Brown v. City of Craig, 350 Mo. 836 , 168 S.W.2d 1080, 1082 . … Brown v. City of Craig, supra.

State v. Cochran

336 Mo. 649 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 1935

[State v. Brown, 171 Mo. 477 , 71 S.W. 1031 .] [3] The State next urges that appellant was estopped to deny that he was the agent of the association in this prosecution because he acted as such, citing State v. … [State v. Brown, supra.]