Case law

Johnson v. United Railways Co.

281 Mo. 90 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 16, 1920

Brown; duly seconded by- Mr. … App. 557 ', the various legal propositions, now again advanced', were exhaustively discussed and the rulings of that court were approved by this court in the case of Johnson v.

State ex rel. Heimberger v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri

268 Mo. 598 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 18, 1916

The board of curators rendered obedience to those. (c) We have no previous decision in this State comparable to the case of Weinberg v. … (f) With respect to the last (6) argument advanced in Sterling v.

State ex rel. Board of Managers of the Reform School v. County Court

89 Mo. 237 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1886

Harris v. Hermann, 75 Mo. 340, the subject of what constitutes a special law is fully considered, and it is not necessary that wé traverse the same grounds again.

State ex rel. Board of Directors v. Dwyer

361 Mo. 325 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1950

Carpenter v. City of St. Louis, 318 Mo. 870 , 2 S. … Louis there is only the City and the Board of Education.)

Quinn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

439 S.W.2d 533 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1969

Co., 328 Mo. 1118 , 43 S.W.2d 817, 821 ), and the peculiar physical characteristics of railroad property, particularly the right of way (Brown v. … Brown v. Weare, supra. Respondents do not contest the railroad’s position that the deeds to the adjacent tracts conveyed fee simple title to the grantee. There are distinctions between the deed here and that in Brown v.

Condemnation of Land in West Park District Under Kansas City Ordinance No. 37008 v. Boruff

295 Mo. 28 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 26, 1922

Co. v. Walsh, 197 Mo. 392 . … Co. v.

State ex rel. O'Connell v. Board of President of St. Louis Public Schools

112 Mo. 213 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 15, 1892

These sections of the constitution were construed in State ex rel. v. … State ex rel. v. Miller, 100 Mo. 439 ; Heller v. Stremmel, 52 Mo. 309 ; State to use v. Tiedemann, 69 Mo. 306 ; State *219 ex rel. v. Tracy, 94 Mo. 217 ; Buchanan v. School District, 25 Mo. App. 85 ; Roach v.

Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. Missouri Real Estate Commission

712 S.W.2d 666 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1986

In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), the Supreme Court of the United States outlawed racial segregation in the public schools of the states. In Cooper v. … The statute in question was substantially the same as the statute held unconstitutional in Virginia Pharmacy Board v.

Missouri Division of Employment Security v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission

651 S.W.2d 145 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1983

Brown v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, 577 S.W.2d 90 (Mo.App.1978); Bussmann Mfg. Co. v. Industrial Comm’n, 327 S.W.2d 487, 491 (Mo.App.1959); Kroger Co. v. … We find no substantial evidence to support the Board of Review’s decision, and this case is reversed and remanded. Terry v.

Suarez v. Thompson

283 S.W.2d 584 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1955

Wilbur Johnson Brown testified in behalf of plaintiff. He is a telephone clerk in the employ of defendant, tie boarded train No. 7 at Tower Grove Station in St. Louis *586 en route to Texarkana on the night Mrs. … The law is clear that any such presumption disappeared from the case when Williams and Brown testified to the contrary. 31 C.J.S., Evidence, § 124, p. 738; Michler v.

State v. Jacobson

348 Mo. 258 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 10, 1941

In Bean v. State (Okla. Crim.), 208 Pac. 834 , Foster v. State (Okla. Crim.), 252 Pac. 450 , Stout v. State (Okla. Crim.), *261 258 Pac. 1054 , and Nicholson v. State (Okla. … Brown, and that he lived on the “Gray” farm near that place, and needed a small sum of money for funeral expenses for his son who had died suddenly. Hpon being identified as “W. E.

Bailey v. Trustees of Mineral School District

14 Mo. 498 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1851

Afterwards, about the 29th of March, 1840, one Brown, who was largely indebted to the school fund, handed over to one or both of these trustees (which, it does not appear) the sum of two hundred dollars, which, as appears … Both parties, however, admitted in their subsequent oral *500 statements to the treasurer of the board, when called upon concerning it, that they were jointly liable for the money.

Hill v. Montgomery

352 Mo. 147 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1943

So, if Brown said to Raab "Go on," Raab truthfully did not have any talk with Brown. The rule relied on by appellants was stated in Adelsberger v. … Kleinschmidt v. Globe-Democrat Pub. Co., 350 Mo. 250 , 165 S.W.2d 620 ; Aulgur v. Strodtman, 329 Mo. 738 , 46 S.W.2d 172 , l.c. 173 [3]; Pfotenhauer v.

Hull v. City of St. Louis

42 L.R.A. 753 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 3, 1897

Fullerton v. Fordyce, 121 Mo. 1 ; Van Natta v. Railroad, 133 Mo. 13 . … Cosgrove v. Leonard, 134 Mo. 419 ; Rose v. Spies, 44 Mo. 20 ; Head v. Hargrave, 105 U. S. 45 ; Bentley v. Brown, 37 Kan. 14 ; Stevens v. City of Minneapolis, 42 Minn. 136 ; Arndt v. Hosford, 82 Iowa, 499 ; Price v.

Roth v. Tiedeman

53 Mo. 489 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1873

Tiedeman and the Board of Education of the City of Capé Girardeau, to enforce a mechanic’s lien against certain property in that city. … Brown, 11 Mo., 139 , as showing that the same words, when-used by the statute defining the jurisdiction of the St. Louis Court of Common Pleas, have received a widely different construction by this court.

Merchants Exchange v. Knott

212 Mo. 616 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 6, 1908

, or that (dropping to detail) Jones’s elevator is subject to the burdens of State weighing and inspection and Brown’s goes scot-free, though both Jones and Brown are doing precisely the same business under the same conditions … Clemens, 43 Mo. 395 ; Matthews v. Alexandria, 68 Mo. 115 ; St. Louis v. Heitzeberg Packing Co., 141 Mo. 375 ; Kansas City v. Bacon, 147 Mo. 259 ; Neill v. Gates, 152 Mo. 585 ; Owen v.

State Ex Rel. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Elliott

387 S.W.2d 489 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1965

The facts appearing in the pleadings; exhibits, and stipulation are as follows: On December 26, 1963, the Relator Board *490 initiatéd proceeding's against Virgil A. Bit-tiker, D. O. … State Tax Commission v. Walsh, Mo.Sup., 315 S.W.2d 830 , State ex rel. Toberman v. Cook, 365 Mo. 274 , 281 S.W.2d 777 , and State ex rel. Dalton v. Oldham, Mo.Sup., 336 S.W.2d 519 .

Cook v. Farrah

105 Mo. 492 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

Shoot, supra; Fugate v. Pierce, 49 Mo. 441 ; Musick v. Barney, 49 Mo. 458 ; Turner v. Mall, 60 Mo. 271 , and Key v. Jennings, 66 Mo. 356 , and continuing the court says: "In Draper v. … The decisive question in Leeper v.

State ex rel. Setzer v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.

90 Mo. 166 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

Brown v. … By section 5010, the board of trustees has power to locate and lay out streets and alleys, and “to open, clear, regulate, grade, pave, or improve the streets and alleys of such town,” and by section 5015, the board has power

State v. Burnley

480 S.W.2d 881 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1972

After the place was closed, there were boards piled inside the window to form a platform. Defendant did not testify and offered no evidence. … Defendant cites State v. Irby, Mo., 423 S.W.2d 800 , and State v. Brown, Mo., 462 S.W.2d 766 .