Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.38s
State ex rel. City of Cabool v. Texas County Board of Equalization
850 S.W.2d 102 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 23, 1993
V, § 3. The judgment is affirmed. … Francois County School Dist. v. Lalumondier, 518 S.W.2d 638 (Mo.1975), and City of Richmond Heights v. Board of Equalization, 586 S.W.2d 338 (Mo. banc 1979).
Cited 8 timesPublishedHess v. Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools
121 Mo. 43 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1894
At the meeting of the board of August 12, 1890, the lands and leasing committee, reported as follows: “V. … He bases his argument upon the action of the board. .
Cited 0 timesPublishedByrne v. Board of President & Directors of the St. Louis Public Schools
12 Mo. 402 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1849
Judge Birch delivered the opinion of the court This was an action of ejectment commenced against the defendant by the board of president and directors of the St. … Judgment was subsequently rendered in- favor of the board, and a recovery awarded conformably with the finding of the jury, for the land described in the declaration.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Anderson Motor Service Co. v. Public Service Commission
339 Mo. 469 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 2, 1936
This conclusion, we think, finds support, in principle, in Brown & Bennett v. Powers, 146 Iowa, 729 . … In Brown & Bennett v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSmith v. School Dist. No. 6 of Jefferson County
250 S.W.2d 795 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1952
In Board v. … Board v. Nevada School District, supra.
Cited 9 timesPublishedCameron Trust Co. v. Cameron Trust Co.
330 Mo. 1070 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 7, 1932
[Harris v. Langford, 277 Mo. 527 , 211 S.W. 19 ; State ex rel. v. Thompson (Mo. App.), 22 S.W.2d 196 .] … [Horigan *Page 1078 Realty Co. v. Flynn, 253 S.W. l.c. 405, (2); Pearson v. Haydel, 90 Mo. App. l.c. 261.]
Cited 15 timesPublishedSte. Genevieve School District R-II v. Board of Aldermen of Ste. Genevieve
66 S.W.3d 6 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 22, 2002
Independence v. Jones, 653 S.W.2d 178,189 (Mo. banc 1983). … Eastern Missouri Laborers District Council v. St.
Cited 65 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Gaines v. Canada
344 Mo. 1238 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 1, 1939
The Schooner Peggy, 1 Cranch, 103 , and quoted approvingly in Simpson v. Stoddard County, 173 Mo. *1244 421, 73 S. … '[See, also, Totten v. James, 55 Mo. 494 ; Hubbard v. Gilpin, 57 Mo. 441 ; Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U. S. 443 ; Texas Co. v. Brown, 258 U. S. 466 ; McCann v. Retirement Board, 331 Ill. 193 , 162 N.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBoard of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Hollingsworth
34 Mo. 191 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1863
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Heimberger v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri
268 Mo. 598 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 18, 1916
The board of curators rendered obedience to those. (c) We have no previous decision in this State comparable to the case of Weinberg v. … (f) With respect to the last (6) argument advanced in Sterling v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedAbernathy v. City of St. Louis
313 S.W.2d 717 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1958
on recommendation of certain boards created by the Charter. … State v. Wilson, 1915, 265 Mo. 1 , 175 S.W. 603 ; Brown v. Morris, 1956, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 166 [160], loc. cit. 167.” We have no quarrel to find with that rule.
Cited 5 timesPublished6 Mo. 526 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 15, 1840
Brown at the witness’s house when she arrived; Hoyle boarded at another place; he thought there was great friendship betwixt the plaintiff and defendant. … Brown states that on the 23d of June she went to Kyle’s to board; on the next day Hoyle came there and told her what a trick Kyle had played on him, and that he had deceived him by false statements; that shortly after Kyle
Cited 1 timesPublishedState ex rel. Collector of St. Louis v. Title Guaranty Trust Co.
261 Mo. 448 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1914
This is not a proceeding by certiorari, where the court must take the record of the board as conclusive, as in State ex rel. v. Baker, 170 Mo. l. c. 203. In State ex rel. v. … J., and Brown, J., concur; Paris, J., concurs in result.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Little Prairie Special Road District v. Thompson
315 Mo. 56 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 15, 1926
v. … Therefore we have to consider only whether on the authority of Browning v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBenton v. German-American National Bank
122 Mo. 332 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 28, 1894
Ass’n v. Printing Co., 25 Mo. App. 643 ; Bank v. Schaumburg, 38 Mo. 228 ; Manhattan Brass Co. v. Co., 37 Mo. App. 145 ; Hyde v. Larkin, 35 Mo. App. 366 ; Johnston v. Shortridge, 93 Mo. 227 ; Bank v. … It appears affirmatively from the evidence that no loans were made by the bank without the sanction of the discount board. Of whom that board was composed, the evidence does not show.
Cited 23 timesPublishedState ex rel. Kelleher v. Board of President of St. Louis Public Schools
134 Mo. 296 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 12, 1896
State ex rel. v. Hoblitzelle, 85 Mo. 620 , concurring opinion of Sheb-wood, J.; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 86 Mo. 13 ; State ex rel. v. Francis, 95 Mo. 44 ; State ex rel. v. St. Louis School Board, 131 Mo. 505 . II. … State Board, etc., v. People ex rel., 13 N. E.
Cited 33 timesPublished196 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1906
In State v. … State v. Grassle, 71 Mo.
Cited 10 timesPublishedState ex rel. Crandall v. McIntosh
205 Mo. 589 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1907
Hathaway v. Board of Health, 103 Mo. 1 . c. 30; State ex rel. Brown v. McIntosh, infra 616.] The fourth paragraph struck at pleads relator’s manifold and long drawn-out laches. … Brown v.
Cited 18 timesPublished70 Mo. 537 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1879
Brown and Leftridge Joice, under which the property aforesaid was seized and sold as the property of Leftridge Joice, and the plaintiff's became the purchasers and received a deed therefor. … The plaintiffs then offered to prove that in August, 1874, an order was made by the board of directors of the bank, directing the sale and assignment of said judgment to the plaintiffs, as made, and that said board afterwards
Cited 3 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of Directors v. Dwyer
361 Mo. 325 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1950
City of Columbia v. Allen, 183 Mo. 283 , 82 S.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna