Case law

State Ex Rel. Zoological Board of Control v. City of St. Louis

318 Mo. 910 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 18, 1928

Hawes v. Mason, 153 Mo. 23 ; State ex rel. Rutledge v. School Board, 131 Mo. 505 ; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 86 Mo. 13 ; State ex rel. v. Nolte, 285 S. W. 501 ; Heather v. Palmyra, 276 S. W. 872 .] … Van Brown v. Van Every, 75 Mo. 530 , is relevant in determining the construction to be given Section 11 of Article X.

Drury Displays, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis

760 S.W.2d 112 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 15, 1988

Citing Kelly v. City of St. … Respondent, as did the trial court, relies on Cohen v.

Estes v. Desnoyers Shoe Co.

155 Mo. 577 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1900

That case is Brown v. Baldwin & Gleason Co., 13 N. Y. … We do not construe the decision in Brown v.

Atkins v. Hulse

62 Mo. 577 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1876

Dillon was in possession, and afterwards, in 1865, sold the property to Hulse, one of the defendants, who subsequently conveyed a portion of it to Brown, the other.defendant. *578 "When the deed from Mrs.

Taussig v. St. Louis & Kirkwood Railroad

166 Mo. 28 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 17, 1901

Rep. 335; Brown v. *35 Silver Mines, 17 Colo. 421 ; Greenesboro Company v. Stratton, 120 Ind. 296 ; Santa Clara Min. Ass’n v. Meredith, 49 Md. 389 ; Rogers v. Railroad, 22 Minn. 25 ; Shackelford v. … [Chandler v. Monmouth Bank, 1 Green (N. J.) 255; Shackleford v. Railroad, 37 Miss. 202 ; New Orleans, etc., Co. v. Brown, 36 La. Ann. 138 ; Cheeney v. Railroad, 68 Ill. 570 ; Henry v. Railroad, 27 Vt. 435 ; Polk v.

State ex rel. Bell v. Yates

231 Mo. 276 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1910

[Smith v. Blachley, 198 Pa. St. 173.] In Stone v. … [Wood v. Carpenter, supra; Stone v. Brown, 116 Ind. 78 ; Mather v. Rogers, 99 Ia. 292 ; Wood on Limitations (3 Ed.), sec. 276; Callan v. Callan, 175 Mo. l. c. 361.]

State ex rel. J.C. Nichols Co. v. Boley

853 S.W.2d 923 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1993

Kelley v. Mitchell, 595 S.W.2d 261, 266-67 (Mo. banc 1980), quoting State ex rel. Brunjes v. Linville, 8 S.W.2d 623 (Mo.1928). … See also State ex rel. *925 Brown v. Antonio, 489 S.W.2d 193, 194 (Mo. banc 1973). The writ is hereby quashed without prejudice to the appeal now pending in the State Tax Commission. All concur. .

Gallup v. State, Department of Corrections & Human Resources, Board of Probation & Parole

733 S.W.2d 435 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1987

The Parole Board has considerable discretion in deciding whether to grant pa *436 role. § 217.690, RSMo 1984, Green v. Black, 755 F.2d 687 (8th Cir.1985). … Browning v. Kelly, 309 Mo. 465 , 274 S.W. 731 (Mo. banc 1925); State v. Merk, 281 S.W.2d 607 (Mo.App.1955). The sentence which consists of confinement for a period of time or a fine constitutes the penalty. McCulley v.

State ex rel. Blair v. Center Creek Mining Co.

262 Mo. 490 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 2, 1914

BROWN, C. … The foregoing opinion of Brown, 0., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.

State Ex Rel. Rogersville Reorganized School District No. R-4 v. Holmes

363 Mo. 760 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1952

Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 627 , 33 S.W. 2d 104, 107 . … Lincoln v.

Moss v. Kauffman

131 Mo. 424 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1895

Sturgeon v. Hampton, 88 Mo. 203 ; Railroad v. Hatton, 102 Mo. 45 ; Railroad v. Wayne County, 125 Mo. 351 . … Allen et al. v. Brown et al.; of State ex rel. Board of Education v. Ann R. Allen et al.; and of State ex rel. W. K. Chander, Prosecuting Attorney of Bollinger County v.

Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank & Trust Co.

576 S.W.2d 310 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1978

He relies on Chamberlain v. Brown, 223 Tenn. 25 , 442 S.W.2d 248 (Tenn.1969) and Beauregard v. Wingard, 230 F.Supp. 167, 185 (S.D.Cal. 1964). … Brown, 270 F.Supp. 782 (E.D.Pa.1967); Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v.

Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Walker

40 Mo. 383 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

As between the parties, a patent upon a confirmation by the old board relates back to the filing of the claim as the inception of the title—Landes v. Brant, 10 How. (U. S.) 343. … The subsequent legislation, according to the decision in Menard’s Heirs v. Massey, 8 How. (U. S.) 293, and in Cabanné v. Walker, 31 Mo. 274 , and Papin v.

Community Fire Protection District of St. Louis County v. Board of Education

312 S.W.2d 75 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1958

Volker v. Kirby, 345 Mo. 801 , 136 S.W.2d 319 [5]; Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. Brandstetter, supra [4]; State ex rel. Thompson v. Roberts, Mo.Sup., 264 S.W.2d 314 [2]. … Young v. Brassfield, Mo.Sup., 223 S.W.2d 491 [1]; Cohen v. Ennis, Mo.Sup., 308 S.W.2d 669 [3], 672.

State ex rel. Barker v. Scott

270 Mo. 146 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 20, 1917

[State ex rel. v. Lounsberry, 125 Mo. 157, 1 . c. 163.] … PER CURIAM: — The foregoing opinion of Brown, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.

State v. Rankin

477 S.W.2d 72 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1972

When Brown stepped out of the Chevrolet Officer Hoffecker observed what appeared to be a weapon lying on the floor board of the front seat of the Chevrolet. … State v. Owens, 302 Mo. 348 , 259 S.W. 100 ; State v. Cuezze, Mo.Sup., 249 S.W.2d 373 ; State v. McBride, 327 Mo. 184 , 37 S.W.2d 423 ; State v. Morice, Mo.Sup., 79 S.W.2d 741 ; State v.

State ex rel. Ziegenhein v. Spencer

114 Mo. 574 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 14, 1893

Wickham v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Laughlin v. Fairbanks, 8 Mo. 370 ; Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 ; George v. Middough, 62 Mo. 549 ; State ex rel. v. Board, 18 S. W. Rep. 782 . … Abbott v. Lindenbower, 42 Mo. 162 ; State v. Board, supra.

State Ex Rel. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co. v. Hendrickson

393 S.W.2d 481 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 20, 1965

Hendrickson, the Clerk of the Village of Lone Jack, who is also a member of the Board of Trustees, and the other members of the Board of Trustees, Richard V. Brown, Rick Carrico, James S. Parker, and Don Muncy. … Elmhurst-Chicago Stone Co., 18 Ill.2d 479 , 165 N.E.2d 310 ; Board of County Commissioners of County of Sarpy v. Petsch, 172 Neb. 263 , 109 N.W.2d 388 1 . c. 390, 391(1) (2) (3, 4); Daoud v.

Anderson v. Public Schools

26 L.R.A. 707 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1894

“Plans and specifications can be seen at the office of Furlong & Brown, the architects, room 38, southeast corner of Broadway and Olive street. *65 “The board reserves the right to reject any or all bids. 0. L. … The facts in judgment are wholly unlike those considered in McNeil v. Boston Chamber of Commerce (1891), 154 Mass. 277 , cited on behalf of the plaintiffs.

In re Sanford

236 Mo. 665 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1911

In concurring in the very able opinion of my brother Woodson, I deem it proper to say that I do not understand the opinion as holding’ that the board of equalization is a court, or that it derives its authority to commit … Woodson, Graves, Kennish and Brown, JJ., concur.