Case law

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Davis

44 Mo. 129 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1869

Kreiter v. … Carondelet, 23 Mo. 22 ; Butler v. Pennsylvania, 10 How. 415 ; Smith v. The Mayor, 37 N. Y. 518 ; Conner v. The Mayor, 1 Seld. 285; People v. Warner, 7 Hill, 81 , 2 Den. 272 ; Baker v. Utica, 19 N. Y. 326 ; Lynch v.

Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Woods

77 Mo. 197 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1883

In a wider sense, I think, the bond is germane to the corporate objects of the school board. … The object and purpose of the bond being entirely within the powers of the board, and the board being constituted the trustee’ of an express trust in the bond, the right to sue on it ought not to be questioned.

State Ex Rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. Smith

339 Mo. 213 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 13, 1936

Whenever in the opinion of the board of fund commissioners it is advisable to do so, and there are sufficient funds therefor, the said board may redeem any of said bonds before maturity if the holders thereof agree thereto … Board of Fund Commissioners et al. v. Smith (Mo. 34,789), 339 Mo. 204 , 96 S. W. (2d) 348 , our alternative writ heretofore issued is quashed. All concur.

Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Risley

40 Mo. 356 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

Defendant gave in evidence a resolution of the board of aldermen of the City of St. … In Smith v.

Moore v. Board of Education of Fulton Public School No. 58

836 S.W.2d 943 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 21, 1992

Belton v. Board of Police Com’rs of Kansas City, 708 S.W.2d 131 (Mo. banc 1986). … Nixon v. Williamson, 703 S.W.2d 526 (Mo.App.1985).

Board of Regents for Normal School District No. 3 v. Painter

102 Mo. 464 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

Rutherford v. Taylor, 38 Mo. 317 ; Trustees v. Council of Hoboken, 33 N. J. L. 16. … As said in Trustees v.

Kissell v. Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools

16 Mo. 553 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1852

Polk’s Lessee v. Wendal, 9 Cranch, 87 . 5 Wheat. 293 . Patterson v. Winn, 11 Wheat. 383 . … Bagnell v. Broderick,, 13 Peters, 436 . Wilcox v. McConnel, ib. 498. 3.

State ex rel. Howard v. Smith

82 Mo. 51 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1884

The court of appeals found that nothing whatever was shown, or charged against the integrity or capacity of Brown, the assistant assigned by the chief janitor, to the rooms in question, but that the judge and other officers … of the criminal court preferred the relator, Howard, and were unwilling to trust Brown in the position; and the judgment in the court of appeals in relator’s favor is based upon the ground that no appointment of a janitor

McCune v. Goodwillie

204 Mo. 306 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 29, 1907

Loring, 63 Mo. 19 ; State ex rel. v. Zachritz, 166 Mo. l. c. 313; Coney v. Laird, 153 Mo. 408 ; Penn v. Hayward, 14 Oh. St. 302; Burnley v. Stevenson, 24 Oh. St. 474; Fox v. … [Mudd v. Dillon, 166 Mo. l. c. 118-119; Huey v. Huey, 65 Mo. l. c. 694, et seq.; Cravens v. Rossiter, 116 Mo. 338 ; Sullivan v. Eddy, 154 Ill. 199 ; Alexander v. DeKermel, 81 Ky. 345 ; Metcalfe v.

Board of Public Works of Rolla v. Sho-Me Power Corp.

362 Mo. 730 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1951

Cirese v. Ridge, 345 Mo. 1096 , 138 SW 2d 1012 ; State ex inf. Barker v. Kansas City Gas Co., 254 Mo. 515 , 163 SW 854 ; State ex rel. Consumers Public Service Co. v. … American Petroleum Exchange v. Public Service Com., Mo. Sup., 172 SW 2d 952 , 955. See also Bell v. City of Fayette, 325 Mo. 75 , 28 SW 2d 356 , and May Department Stores Co. v.

Atchison v. Retirement Board of Police Retirement System of Kansas City

343 S.W.2d 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1961

In Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System of Oklahoma City v. … Mott Store Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co., 254 Mo. 654 , 163 S.W. 929 , loc. cit. 931; Brown v. Marshall, 241 Mo. 707 , 145 S.W. 810 ; State *34 ex rel. Klein v. Hughes, 351 Mo. 651 , 173 S.W.2d 877 , loc. cit. 880.

State v. Smith

384 S.W.2d 516 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1964

the Hodiamont car tracks where he boarded an eastbound streetcar. … State v. Simler, 350 Mo. 646 , 167 S.W.2d 376, 383 .

State v. Hack

118 Mo. 92 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 21, 1893

This evidence was offered for the purpose of proving by the admission of Brown that he had *99 committed the larceny and not the defendant on trial. This evidence was mere hearsay and clearly inadmissible. State v. … It was held by this court in the case of State v.

Matthew v. Smith

707 S.W.2d 411 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1986

Hudson, 400 S.W.2d 425 (Mo.App.1966); Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 851 (Mo.App.1964); Bartholomew v. Bd. of Zoning Adj., 307 S.W.2d 730 (Mo.App.1958). . … E.g., Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845 (Mo.App.1964). . We need not reach appellant’s charge of bias. Suffice it to say, that the Board acts as a quasi-judicial body and must assure a fair and impartial hearing.

Brinkerhoff Zinc Co. v. Boyd

192 Mo. 597 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 16, 1906

The trial resulted in a judgment for defendants Boyd and Brown, the trustee, and the plaintiff and the Bank of Aurora appeal. … Brown had notice of the plaintiff’s claim before he paid the money to Mr.

Trotter v. Board of President & Directors of St. Louis Public Schools

9 Mo. 68 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1845

Louis, is ineffectual to divert the trust to the use of such inhabitants, and the authority in said act to elect the board of directors of public schools, &c., for the modern city of St. … Riddick and Penrose, contained in the State Papers of that year, (Duff Green’s ED. v. II. p. 377,) are .calculated to strenghten this construction of the act. In Mr. Penrose’s letter to Mr.

State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Fallon

41 S.W.3d 474 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 2001

New York State Conference of Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Ins. Co., 514 U.S. 645, 656 , 115 S.Ct. 1671 , 131 L.Ed.2d 695 (1995); see also Egelhoff v. … The Arizona Court of Appeals addressed a simhar argument in Murphy v. Board of Medical Examiners, 190 Ariz. 441 , 949 P.2d 530 (Ariz.Ct.App.1997).

School District Number Four v. School District Number Three

238 Mo. 407 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1911

[School District v. Boyle, 182 Mo. 347 ; School District v. Burris, 84 Mo. App. l. c. 662; State ex rel. v. Andrae, 216 Mo. 617 .] … Ferriss and Brown, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Board of Health Center Trustees v. County Commission

896 S.W.2d 627 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 25, 1995

Bash v. Truman, 335 Mo. 1077 , 75 S.W.2d 840 (1934). … Lane v. Kirkpatrick, 485 S.W.2d 62, 64 (Mo.1972). As the requirement of mandamus has been met, this point is denied. V.

Board of Ministerial Relief of Cumberland Presbyterian Church v. Drummond

167 Mo. 54 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 19, 1902

Church, the Board of Ministerial Relief of the O. P. Church of Evansville and the Board of Education of the 0. P. Church of Nashville, Defendants. … [Young v. Young, 165 Mo. 630 ; Railroad v. Holschlag, 144 Mo. 253 ; Atkinson v. Railroad, 81 Mo. 50 ; Belkin v. Rhodes, 76 Mo. 643 ; Ex. Nat. Bank v. Allen, 68 Mo. 474 ; State ex rel. v.