Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • City of Brunswick Ex Rel. Barkwell v. Beneke

    289 Mo. 307 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 19, 1921

    Downey, 150 Mo. 317 ; Howard v. Brown, 197 Mo. 36 ; Brown v. Howard, 264 Mo. 501 ). It will be seen that by excluding the date of the first issue, June 29th, the publication extended over a period of only 27 days. … In State v. Brown, 130 Mo. App. 214 , l. c. 219, Bland, P.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Tendai v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    161 S.W.3d 358 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 2005

    Haase v. Garfinkel, 418 S.W.2d 108, 118 (Mo.1967); Swope v. Printz, 468 S.W.2d 34, 39 (Mo. 1971). “The appropriate standard of care is a question of law.” Lopez v. Three Rivers Elec. … See, e.g., Fowler v. Park Corp., 673 S.W.2d 749 (Mo. banc 1984); Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 428 S.W.2d 596 (Mo.1968). In Duncan v. Mo. Bd. for Architects, Prof.

    Overruled on other grounds by Albanna v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 2009 Mo. LEXIS 313 (2009)Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Missouri State Board of Agriculture v. Woods

    317 Mo. 403 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1927

    This is an original proceeding in mandamus brought by the State Board of Agriculture to compel the Assessor of Boone County to accept and receive from the county clerk of that county the inquiry blanks certified out by the … [State ex rel. v. Williams, 232 Mo. 56 .] It is clearly valid as to him. His duties in the premises are clearly and definitely prescribed.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Roach v. Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools

    77 Mo. 484 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1883

    This is a petition in the nature of a bill of injunction against the Board of President and Birectors of the St. … On the other hand, it is insisted by defendant, first, that no such restriction is imposed on the power of its school board; and that its schools are public schools, for the education and instruction of its pupils in such

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Dent v. Sigerson

    29 Mo. 489 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1860

    Our conclusion is, then, that Brown’s survey, being a legal and approved survey in 1884, must prevail over a title emanating from the United States two years afterwards. In McGill v. … Justice Catron in Le Bois v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Allen v. Walker

    80 Mo. 610 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

    Brown v. … Brown v. Holladay. In order to award a peremptory mandamus here, we must.so construe the act of 1883 as to give it retrospective effect, and this cannot be done, unless it be warranted by its terms.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jefferson City

    862 S.W.2d 338 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 28, 1993

    V, § 3. … In Campbell v.

    Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Hoffmann v. Kinealy

    389 S.W.2d 745 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 10, 1965

    When the same factual situation was presented a second time in Brown v. … Women’s Christian Ass’n. of Kansas City v. Brown, 354 Mo. 700, 709 , 190 S.W.2d 900, 906 ; Brown v. Gambrel, 358 Mo. 192 , 213 S.W.2d 931, 935 ; State ex rel. Capps v.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Chapman v. Walbridge

    153 Mo. 194 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1899

    Walbridge, 119 Mo. 383 ; State ex rel. v. St. Louis, 90 Mo. 19 ; State ex rel. v. Brown, 57 Mo. App. 199 ; State ex rel. v. Police Comms., 14 Mo. App. 297 ; s. c., 88 Mo. 144 ; Mechem’s Pub. Off. and Offs., sec. 454.] … [Givens v. Daviess Co., 107 Mo. 603 ; Gammon v. Lafayette Co., 76 Mo. 675 ; State ex rel. v. Carr, 3 Mo. App. 6 ; State ex rel. v. Brown, 146 Mo. 401 ; Fitzsimmons v. Brooklyn, 102 N. Y. 536 ; Andrews v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Eberle v. Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools

    11 Mo. 247 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1848

    These considerations should admonish courts to listen v/ith caution to the complaints of those who have long^delayed the assertion of their rights.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Lappin v. Prebe

    345 Mo. 68 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1939

    [Bates v. Brown Shoe Co. (1938), 342 Mo. 411 , 418[1], 116 S.W.2d 31 , 33[1].] Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Chamberlain, 288 U.S. 333 , 341, 53 Sup. … (Banc), 244 Mo. 76 , 95, 148 S.W. 925, 930 ; Rashall v. St. Louis, I.M. S. Ry. Co., 249 Mo. 509 , 522, 155 S.W. 426, 430 ; Brown v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Lute v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    218 S.W.3d 431 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 17, 2007

    V, sec. 4. This Court issues writs of mandamus ordering the Board to promptly conduct parole hearings for Lute and Branch in accordance with this opinion. I. … See State v. Branch, *435 757 S.W.2d 595 (Mo.App.1988). She was convicted again on March 3, 1989, of first degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for 50 years. State v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pree v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Retirement System

    363 Mo. 1131 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1953

    State v. Wipke et al., Mo. Sup., 133 S. W. 2d 354 ; State ex rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Smith, 342 Mo. 75 , 111 S. W. 2d 513 ; Holder v. Elms Hotel [688] Co., 338 Mo. 857 , 92 S. W. 2d 620 , 104 A.L.R. 339 . … Louis Public Service Co. v. Public Service Commission, 326 Mo. 1169 , 34 S. W. 2d 486 ; Holder v. Elms Hotel Co., 338 Mo. 857 , 92 S. W. 2d 620 , 104 A.L.R. 339 ; State ex rel. St. Louis Die Casting Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Hammond

    21 Mo. 238 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1855

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dent v. Bingham

    8 Mo. 579 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1844

    said Brown, if not made in conformity to the claim to commons by the inhabitants of Carondelet before the old board of commissioners, as given in evidence by the plaintiff, is no evidence of the extent or boundary of said … Brown forty years afterwards.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Eppright v. Nickerson

    78 Mo. 482 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

    Co. v. Thomas, 2 Phila. 344; Lionberger v. Broadway Savings Bank, 10 Mo. App. 499 . … Powell v. N. M. R. R. Co., 42 Mo. 68 ; Germantown Pass. R’y Co. v. Fitler, 60 Pa. St. 124; Wood v. Dummer, 3 Mass. 308 ; Webster v. Upton, 91 U. S. 65 ; Sawyer v. Hoag, 17 Wall. 621 ; Sagory v. Dubois, 3 Sandf.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Wood v. Board of Educ. of St. Louis

    357 Mo. 147 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1947

    Brown v. Board of Education, [ 294 Mo. 106 , 242 S. W. 85 ; 299 Mo. 465 , 253 S. W. 973 ], heretofore discussed, establish some sort of tenure for the teachers . . . … The Board could not arbitrarily discharge a teacher . . . ” Gartenbach v. Board of Education, 356 Mo. 890 , 204 S. W. (2d) 273 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Fine v. Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools

    39 Mo. 59 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1866

    Clark, 19 Mo. 570 ; Guitard v. Stoddard, 16 How. (U. S.) 494. … Perkins, 12 Mo. 257 ; Barada v. Blumenthal, 20 Mo. 162 . The question was again reviewed in this court in Clark v. Hammerle, 86 Mo. 520 , and the doctrine of the above cases affirmed.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. Smith

    339 Mo. 213 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 13, 1936

    Whenever in the opinion of the board of fund commissioners it is advisable to do so, and there are sufficient funds therefor, the said board may redeem any of said bonds before maturity if the holders thereof agree thereto … Board of Fund Commissioners et al. v. Smith (Mo. 34,789), 339 Mo. 204 , 96 S. W. (2d) 348 , our alternative writ heretofore issued is quashed. All concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Risley

    40 Mo. 356 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1867

    Defendant gave in evidence a resolution of the board of aldermen of the City of St. … In Smith v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.