Case law

American Fire Alarm Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners

285 Mo. 581 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1920

Water Commissioners of City of New York, 2 Hill, 432 ; Swift v. Mayor of New York, 83 N. Y. 528 ; Gardner v. Board of Health, 10 Selden (N. Y.) 410; Rauh v. Commissioners of Parks, 66 How. Prac. 368 ; Madden v. … Y.) 224, 227; Todd v. Birdsall, 1 Cowen (N. Y.) 260; Gross v. Ky. Board of Managers Columbian Exp., 105 Ky. 840 ; Ingersoll, Quasi Corp. sec. 33.]

State Ex Rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. Holman

296 S.W.2d 482 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1956

Moore v. Brown, supra, 165 S.W.2d 657, 659 . But as stated in Moore v. … Brown v. Bishop, 105 Me. 272, 283 , 74 A. 724, 729 . In General Engineering & Dry Dock Co. v. East Bay Mun. U.

State ex rel. Rutledge v. St. Louis School Board

131 Mo. 505 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1895

School Directors (1881) 74 Mo. 21 ; State v. Brown (1882) 38 Ohio St. 344 ; State ex rel. v. Ware (1886) 13 Ore. 380 ( 10 Pac. Rep. 885 .) 2. … State ex rel. v. Railroad (1885) 86 Mo. 13 ; State ex rel. v. Francis (1888) 95 Mo. 44 ( 8 S. W. Rep. 1 ).

Younge v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts

451 S.W.2d 346 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1969

Hughes v. State Board of Health, 348 Mo. 1236 , 159 S.W.2d 277 ; Gaddy v. State Board of Registration, Mo.App., 397 S.W.2d 347 ; Bittiker v. State Board of Registration, Mo.App., 404 S.W. 2d 402 ; State ex rel. … Gaddy v. State Board of Registration, Mo.App., 397 S.W.2d 347 ; Bridges v. State Board of Registration, Mo.App., 419 S.W.2d 278 ; Rose v.

Reichert v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY ST. LOUIS

217 S.W.3d 301 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 2007

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). B. … ACME Royalty Co. v. Dir. of Revenue, 96 S.W.3d 72, 74 (Mo. banc 2002). Construction of statutes should avoid unreasonable or absurd results, Murray v. Missouri Highway and Transp.

State Ex Rel. Johnson v. State Board of Health

288 Mo. 659 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 8, 1921

[State v. Johnson 118 Mo. 491 ; State v. Colvin, 226 Mo. l. c. 481; State v. Nocton, 121 Mo. 537 ; State v. Kelleher, 201 Mo. 614 ; State v. Gow, 235 Mo. 307 .] … To this contention we are constrained to give assent in, considering a similar question, Brown, P. J. *673 speaking for the court in State ex rel. Spriggs v.

State Ex Rel. Mathewson v. Board of Election Commissioners

841 S.W.2d 633 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 27, 1992

Williams v. Marsh, 626 S.W.2d 223, 227 (Mo. banc 1982). … In Rathjen v.

Board of Trustees of Westminster College v. Fry

192 Mo. 552 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1905

[Riley’s Admr. v. McCord’s Admr., 21 Mo. 285 ; Thornton v. Pigg, 24 Mo. 249 ; Boyd v. Ellis, 107 Mo. 394 .] II. … This court, in Railroad v. Brown, 43 Mo. l. c. 297, said: ‘ ‘ But when the judgment in the case of Brown v. The Hannibal & St. Joe R. R.

Hart v. Board of Education of Nevada School District

299 Mo. 36 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1923

[State v. Maitland, 246 *40 S. W. 267, 272.] … Wahl v. Speer, 284 Mo. 45 ; State ex rel. v. Allen, 183 Mo. 283 ; State ex rel. v. Allen, 178 Mo. 555 ; Blaine v. Hamilton, 64 Wash. 353 ; City of Oakland v. Thompson, 151 Cal. 572 ; Mitchell v.

State Ex Rel. Board of Police Commr. v. Beach

325 Mo. 175 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1930

As supporting this contention they cite State ex rel. v. … L. 381; State ex rel. v. Shannon, 133 Mo. 139, 164 , 33 S. W. 1137 .] Other items challenged follow: Attorney and Assistant Attorney for the Board, Court Bailiff, 54 Chauffeurs and 17 Iiostlers.

Kraus v. Board of Education of City of Jennings

492 S.W.2d 783 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1973

In King v. … Wright v. Board of Education, 295 Mo. 466 , 246 S.W. 43, 47 (1922).

State ex rel. Board of Education v. County Court

98 Mo. 362 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1889

State Ex Rel. Inscho v. Missouri Dental Board

339 Mo. 547 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1936

In this connection respondent cites Green v. … Williams v. Purl, 228 Mo. 1 , 128 S.W. 196 .]

State Ex Rel. Brewton v. Board of Education

361 Mo. 86 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1950

(See Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U. S. 537 , 16 S. Ct. 1138 , 41 L. Ed. 256 ; Cumming v. County Board of Education, 175 U. S. 528 , 20 S. Ct. 197 , 44 L. Ed. 262 ; McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 235 U. … Toliver v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, 360 Mo. 671 , 230 S. W. (2d) 724 .)

State ex rel. Tompras v. Board of Election Commissioners

136 S.W.3d 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 2004

Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central Committee, 489 U.S. 214 , 109 S.Ct. 1013 , 103 L.Ed.2d 271 , (1989). … See Marchioro v. Chaney, 90 Wash.2d 298 , 582 P.2d 487 (1978) (upholding similar state statute under state equal rights amendment); Ricard v.

State ex rel. Campbell v. Board of Police Commissioners

88 Mo. 144 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1885

We are satisfied with the conclusion reached by the court of appeals, viz., that the board could not remove Campbell, the chief of police, except for cause. … The statute requires the board, when it appoints a chief, to fix the term for which he shall hold the office, and provides that he can only be removed for cause; and the board cannot evade the latter provision, either by

Franklin Avenue German Savings Institution v. Board of Education

75 Mo. 408 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1882

Co. v. St. Mary's Seminary, 52 Mo. 480 , and cases cited; Ferris v. … Thornton v. National Exchange Bank, 71 Mo. 221 , and cases cited. IV.

Board of Trustees of Hannibal Presbytery v. Taylor

359 Mo. 417 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1949

The conveyance was to certain named persons as “a board of managers for Corinth Church” and “to their successors in office as said board of managers for the use and benefit of .said' church.” … [Hadley v. Forsee, supra, 203 Mo. l. c. 427; Chambers v. St. Louis, 29 Mo. l. c. 590.]

State ex rel. Orr v. Board of Trustees

175 Mo. 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1903

Jackson v. Members of Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

301 S.W.3d 71 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 12, 2010

Jerry-Russell Bliss v. Hazardous Waste, 702 S.W.2d 77, 81 (Mo. banc 1985). The new fee for parole services does not change the effect of Jackson’s conviction or his prior parole status. … Section 217.690.3 states: "The board has discretionary authority to require the payment of a fee, not to exceed sixty dollars per month, from eveiy offender placed under board supervision on probation, parole, or conditional