Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.21s
Dunbar v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
380 S.W.2d 442 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1964
Curtin v. Zerbst Pharmacal Co., 333 Mo. 346 , 62 S.W.2d 771, 772 ; Veal v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., 249 S.W.2d 491, 495 ; Superior Press Brick Co. v. City of St. Louis, Mo., 152 S.W.2d 178 .” … Co. v. Kansas City Transit, Inc., Mo., 339 S.W.2d 766 ; Barnes v. Anchor Temple Assn., Mo., 369 S.W.2d 192, 193 [l-3].
Cited 6 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Memorial Hospital v. Russell
843 S.W.2d 353 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1992
See, e.g., Schroeder v. City of St. Louis, 228 S.W.2d 677 (Mo.1950); Zummo v. Kansas City, 285 Mo. 222 , 225 S.W. 934 . … Thus we do not decide the issue faced by the Court of Appeals in Board of Trustees v. Conway, 675 S.W.2d 36 (Mo.App.1984). 8 .
Cited 57 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Evans v. Brown Builders Electrical Co.
254 S.W.3d 31 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 20, 2008
See Verni v. … See, e.g., Bonney v. Envtl.
Cited 31 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees v. Attorney-General
228 Mo. 514 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1910
The charter gives to the board of trustees the power to fill vacancies, thus making the board self-perpetuating; it also gives them power to create vacancies by removal from office, but although now a difference has arisen … Section 3 of this article declares that “The board of trustees shall have oversight, approval and direction of all endowment funds, of all real estate and personal property, and of all loans made of them.”
Cited 6 timesPublishedBoard of Election Commissioners v. Knipp
784 S.W.2d 797 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1990
Jackson County v. Waltner, 340 Mo. 137 , 100 S.W.2d 272, 275 (banc 1936). See also State ex rel. Wilson v. … Hockemeier v. Berra, 641 S.W.2d 67, 68 (Mo. banc 1982).
Cited 11 timesPublishedPage v. Township Board of Education
59 Mo. 264 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1875
There was no dispute that the services were rendered, and that the fee was a reasonable one; hut the court gave judgment for the defendant on the grounds that there was no written contract made with said school board, and … no order entered on the minutes of the board at a regular or stated meeting of said board.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPuterbaugh v. Township Board of Education
53 Mo. 472 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1873
And all contracts, made by the local directors under the provisions of this section, must be reported to the Township Board of Education, &c. … Section ten of the same law makes the Township Board of Education “a body politic and corporate” with power to sue and be sued.
Cited 1 timesPublishedEx Parte McKittrick Ex Rel. Donaldson v. Brown
337 Mo. 281 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 10, 1935
Brown, Adjutant General of the State of Missouri. The sheriff has a warrant for the arrest of Bixler on a charge of second degree murder. … But in Caldwell v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState ex rel. Brown v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
92 Mo. 137 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1887
Pettis Co. v. … In the case of State ex rel. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedJohn T. Brown, Inc. v. WEBER IMPLEMENT & AUTO. CO
260 S.W.2d 751 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 14, 1953
Morel v. … Conklin v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 331 Mo. 734 , 55 S.W.2d 306, 308 (I); Orlann v. Laederich, 338 Mo. 783 , 92 S.W.2d 190, 194, 195 . Consult Reed v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Equality Savings & Building Ass'n v. Brown
334 Mo. 781 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1934
Brown, in his capacity as Secretary of State-. … Railway Company v. Becker, 328 Mo. 541 , 41 S. W. (2d) 188 ; State ex rel. Thompson v. Jones, 328 Mo. 267 , 41 S. W. (2d) 393 ; State ex rel. Railroad Company v. Johnston, 234 Mo. 338 , 137 S. W. 595 .]
Cited 21 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Brown
330 Mo. 220 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1932
Brown, Judge of the Circuit Court of Jackson County to set aside an order dismissing the case of General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. … [See, also, State v. Rich, 20 Mo. 393 ; Burt v. Winona & St. Paul Railroad Co., 31 Minn. 472 , 18 N. W. 285 ; State ex rel. Bales v. Bailey, 106 Minn. 138 , 118 N. W. 676 ; Jenkins v. State, 93 Ga. 1 , 18 S.
Cited 12 timesPublishedSmith v. Township Board of Education
58 Mo. 297 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1874
to be members of said board of education. … The notice was for a meeting of the board of education of township numbered 9, and they attempted to form a district out of territory, a part of which was in another township, which said board had no power to do.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKaren Carpenter v. State Board of Nursing
508 S.W.3d 110 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 2016
V, sec. 10. … In Farrar v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCooper v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
866 S.W.2d 135 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 23, 1993
Gale v. Moore, 763 F.2d 341, 343 (8th Cir.1985); see also Berdella v. Pender, 821 S.W.2d 846, 851 (Mo. banc 1991). … . *139 V. There is no issue of material fact. The parole board and the individual defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm the summary judgment. All concur.
Cited 20 timesPublishedIn Re Rust v. Missouri Dental Board
348 Mo. 616 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 22, 1941
Inscho v. Missouri Dental Board, 339 Mo. 547, 552 , 98 S. W. (2d) 606 ; State ex rel. Lentine v. State Board of Health, supra, 334 Mo. 220 , 65 S. W. (2d) 943 ; State v. Maher, 232 Mo. App. 998 ; 124 S. … Dental Board, 282 Mo. 292 , 221 S. W. 70 ; State ex rel. Williams v. Purl and Mo. Dental Board, 228 Mo. 1 , 128 S. W. 196 .
Cited 17 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. National Surety Co.
183 Mo. 166 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 20, 1904
H. & V. … Moore v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedVan Kirk v. Board of Police Commissioners
586 S.W.2d 350 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1979
Christy v. Petrus, 365 Mo. 1187 , 295 5.W.2d 122, 124 (Mo. banc 1956); Williams v. Jones, 562 S.W.2d 391, 395 [4, 5] (Mo.App.1978); Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … Because his service is during the pleasure of the board, he has no eonstitu-tionally protected right to the office. The Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, supra; Christy v. Petrus, supra; Bishop v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedState ex rel. Brown Contracting & Building Co. v. Cook
181 Mo. 596 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 11, 1904
Brown, its president, and George L. … As to the eases of Railroad v. Board, 6 Kan. 245 , and Empire Mills v. Alston Grocery Company, 15 S. W. 200 , we need only repeat what was said by the Court of Appeals of New York in Demarest v. Flack, 128 N.
Cited 7 timesPublishedExpungement of Arrest Records Related to Brown v. State
226 S.W.3d 147 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 26, 2007
York v. Daugherty, 969 S.W.2d 228 (Mo. banc 1998); State ex rel Dept. of Social Services v. Houston, 989 S.W.2d 950 (Mo. banc 1999); Div. of Child Support Enforcement v. … Louis v. Hughes, 950 S.W.2d 850, 853 (Mo. banc 1997); Rule 74.01(a). . This question is the subject of another related case in front of this Court, Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna