Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

2.75s

  • Board of Commisioners v. Peter

    253 Mo. 520 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 24, 1913

    [Brooks v. Schultz, 178 Mo. l. c. 228.] … [Farrar v. St. Louis, 80 Mo. l. c. 387 et seq., and cases cited and reviewed; Kansas City v. Bacon, 147 Mo. l. c. 282.]

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Board of Regents v. Palmer

    356 Mo. 946 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1947

    Co. v. Fowler, 113 Mo. 458 , 20 S.W. 1069 ; Galloway v. … Kendall v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Gartenbach v. Board of Education

    356 Mo. 890 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1947

    Brown v. Board of Education, 294 Mo. 106 , 242 S. W. 85 ; second appeal 299 Mo. 465 , 253 S. W. 973 . … Brown v. Board of Education, heretofore discussed, establish some sort of tenure for the teachers.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Wilson

    216 Mo. 301 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1909

    This is one of the cases referred to and tried with the case of this plaintiff v. A. C. Wilson, ante, page 215. … [State ex rel. v. Hurt, 113 Mo. 1 . c. 96; State ex rel. v. Bank, 144 Mo. 1 . c. 384; Thomas v. Chapin, 116 Mo. 1 . c. 399; State ex rel. v. Bank, 120 Mo. 161 ; State ex rel. v. Harper, 83 Mo. 670 .]

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

    85 Mo. 123 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

    Smith v. Railroad Co., 53 Mo. 338 , is a case precisely similar to this. Kinser v. Shands, 52 Mo. 326 ; Garnett v. Rodgers, 52 Mo. 145 ; Laughlin v. January, 59 Mo. 383 . All concur, except Henry, C. J., absent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Van Brown v. Shepherd

    74 Mo. 310 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881

    We have been cited to the case of the City of Kansas v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Brown v. Woods

    332 Mo. 1123 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1933

    Reynolds v. Rickenbrode et al., 319 Mo. 468 , 4 S. W. (2d) 436 . That case was ruled on different facts and under a different statute. The judgment should be reversed. It is so ordered. All concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Estate of Cook v. Brown

    346 Mo. 281 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1940

    [First National Bank of Kansas City v. White, 220 Mo. 717 , 120 S. W. 36 . Cf. Vennum v. Mertens, 119 Mo. App. 461 , 95 S. W. 292 ; O’Connell v. Smith et al., 131 S. W. (2d) 730 .] The mere fact that the St. … In Cole v. Cunningham, 133 U. S. 107 , l. c. 112, Mr.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp.

    150 S.W.3d 287 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 7, 2004

    Kevin and Melody Brown borrowed money from First Horizon Home Loan Corp. A deed of trust secured the loan. The Browns paid the loan in full. … Const, article V, section 3. Because the demand letter did not sufficiently track the statutory requirements of section 443.130, the judgment is reversed. As this Court recently noted in Garr v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

    175 Mo. 185 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1903

    [Ash v. Independence, 145 Mo. 120 ; Ibid., 169 Mo. 77 ; Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Hord, 145 Mo. 117 ; Vaughn v. Railroad, 145 Mo. l. c. 61; Shewalter v. Railroad, 152 Mo. 544 ; Coleman v. Cole, 158 Mo. l. c. 258.] … [Vaughn v. Railroad, 145 Mo. l. c. 61; Pim v. St. Louis, 165 U. S. 273 ; Oxley Stave Co. v. Butler Co., 166 U. S. 648 .]

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Parmley v. Missouri Dental Board

    719 S.W.2d 745 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 18, 1986

    Younger v. Colorado State Board of Law Examiners, 625 F.2d 372 , 377 n. 3 (10th Cir.1980) (practice of law not a fundamental right). … State v. Young, 695 S.W.2d 882, 884 (Mo. banc 1985) [citations omitted]. See also, State v. Brown, 660 S.W.2d 694, 697 (Mo. .banc 1983); State ex rel. Williams v. Marsh, 626 S.W.2d 223 , 233 • (Mo. banc 1982).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cathey Ex Rel. Brown v. De Weese

    289 S.W.2d 51 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1956

    The latter part of *53 March 1952 they employed Leon, at a wage of thirty dollars a week plus room and board, to do general farm work. … Jackson v. Butler, supra; Evans v. General Explosives Co., supra; Smiley v. Jessup, supra; Bulson v. International Shoe Co., supra; Benjamin v. C. Hager & Sons Hinge Mfg. Co., supra; Carter v. Baldwin, supra; Ludwig v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.

    137 Mo. 529 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1897

    Knapp, Stout & Co. v. Railroad, supra; Lockwood v. Railroad, supra; Dubach v. Railroad, 89 Mo. 483 . In this case the city council of St. … Cummings v. St. Louis, 90 Mo. 263 ; Glaessner v. Brewing Ass’n, 100 Mo. 511 ; Schopp v. St. Louis, 117 Mo. 133 ; Lockwood v. Railroad, supra.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hampton S. Brown v. GoJet Airlines, LLC

    Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 7, 2023

    V, sec. 10. … Brown v. Chipotle Servs., LLC, 645 S.W.3d 518, 523-24 (Mo. App. 2022).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board v. Nevada School District

    363 Mo. 328 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1952

    Brown v. Hughes, 345 Mo. 958 , 137 S.W. (2d) 544, 545 . And see Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville, 359 Mo. 282 , 221 S.W. (2d) 471, 479 . … Jur. 261 , Improvements, Sec. 4; May v. Board of Education, 12 Ohio App. 456 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. Board of Trade

    81 Mo. 137 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

    Western Bank v. Gilstrap, 45 Mo. 419 ; Southgate v. A. & P. R. R. Co., 61 Mo. 89 ; Turner v. R. R. Co., 51 Mo. 505 ; American Ins. Co. v. Oakley, 9 Paige 496 ; Thompson v. School v. Dist., 71 Mo. 495 . … Goodwin v. Union S. Co., 84 N. H. 378. And it must likewise be conceded, as argued by plaintiffs’ counsel, and decided in Fister v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad

    72 Mo. 567 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1880

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chambers v. Board of Education

    60 Mo. 370 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1875

    Turney testified as follows: “ I have been a member of the Board since its organization, and treasurer of the Board ; was present at the meeting of the Board at which Mr. … Adopting then the modification of the English rule, as laid down in Woods v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Missouri Dental Board v. Alexander

    628 S.W.2d 646 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1982

    Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners v. Hyder, 114 Ariz. 544 , 562 P.2d 717 (Banc 1977); People ex rel. Dunbar v. Kogul, 179 Colo. 394 , 501 P.2d 738 (1972); Clark v. … Bolton v. Kansas City Board of Healing Arts, 473 F.Supp. 728 (D.Kan.1979); Wall & Ochs, Inc. v. Hicks, 469 F.Supp. 873, 874 (E.D.N.C. 1979); Metpath, Inc. v. Myers, 462 F.Supp. 1104 (N.D.Cal.1978); Metpath, Inc. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • William Brown Estate Co. v. Wayne County

    123 Mo. 464 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 25, 1894

    Brown its first mortgage bonds on the St. … Consequently, when the case of the Railway Company v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.