Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

7.67s

  • Brown v. Woods

    48 Mo. 330 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1871

    (Ashby v. Winston, 26 Mo. 210 ; Bank of the State of Missouri v. Parris, 35 Mo. 371 .) The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded. The other judges concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ward v. Board of Equalization

    135 Mo. 309 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 1896

    State ex rel. v. Dowling, 50 Mo. 134 ; State ex rel. v. St. Louis County Court, 47 Mo. 594 ; Railroad v. Board of Equalisation, 64 Mo. 294 . … Railroad v. Board of Equalization, supra; State ex rel. v. Board of Equalization, 108 Mo. 235 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Hamilton

    202 Mo. 377 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 19, 1907

    The views of this court as to the manner and method of assessing the property of a minor, is indicated in State ex rel. v. Burr, 143 Mo. 209 , and State ex rel. v. Brown, 172 Mo. 374 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Shields

    62 Mo. 247 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1876

    anterior to the 18th day of April, 1872, in such a eon *249 dition as to be a public nuisance, and were thereupon, on the last named day, in conformity with the act above recited, declared to be a public nuisance by the Board … & Stillwell thereupon gave bonds in the penal sum of twenty thousand dollars with the defendants as their securities for the faithful performance of their contract, which bond by its terms was given and payable “ to the Board

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Board of Education

    63 Mo. 137 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1876

    duly employed by entering into a written contract with the board.” … This proposal was communicated to the board. The board thereupon appointed a committee with instructions to employ the plaintiff and his wife at the sum proposed.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Brown v. St. Louis Public Service Company

    421 S.W.2d 255 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1967

    Instruction No. 6 was as follows: “If you find the issues in favor of plaintiff, Carrie Brown, then you must award the plaintiff such sum as you believe will fairly and justly compensate the plaintiff, Carrie Brown, for any … In Pender v.

    Cited 115 timesPublished
  • Krueger v. Board of Education

    310 Mo. 239 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1925

    [Cochran v. Wilson, 287 Mo. 210 ; Dick v. Board of Education, 238 S.W. 1073 .] … The decision in Dick v. Board of Education, 238 S.W. 1073 , followed that in Cochran v. Wilson.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Drake v. Board of Education

    208 Mo. 540 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 24, 1907

    Board of Public Schools, 120 Mo. 447 . … [Syms v. Mayor, 105 N. Y. 153 ; Carr v. Ellison, 20 Wend. 178 ; Banker v. Braker, 9 Abb. N. C. (N. Y.) 414; Rutgers v. Hunter, 6 Johns. Ch. 215 ; Whitlock v. Duffield, Hoffman’s Ch. (N. Y.) 110.]

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R.

    66 Mo. 588 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1877

    Garretzen v. Duenckel, 50 Mo. 104 ; Perkins v. M. K. & T. R. R. Co., 55 Mo. 202 ; Snyder v. Han. St. Jo. R. R. Co., 60 Mo. 413 ; Brown v. Han. & St. Jo. R. R. Co., 50 Mo. 461 ; Hicks v. Pacific R. R. … Pratt, 37 Ill. 243 , is to the contrary, but was cited by this court in Paulette v. Brown, 40 Mo. 60 , and expressly disapproved.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Reid v. Board of Education

    73 Mo. 295 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1880

    This precise question was so determined in the case of the City of Cincinnati v. Lessees of White, 6 Peters 440 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission

    649 S.W.2d 874 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 26, 1983

    V, § 3. … Marine Co. v.

    Cited 64 timesPublished
  • Plank v. R. J. Brown Petroleum Co.

    332 Mo. 1150 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 12, 1933

    Co., supra; Burnison v. Souders, 225 Mo. App. 1159 , 35 S.W.2d 619 ; Colby v. Thompson, supra; Bante v. Wells, supra.] … [Lebrecht v. United Rys.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Brown v. Antonio

    489 S.W.2d 193 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 17, 1973

    Weinstein v. St. Louis County et al., Mo., 421 S.W.2d 249 ; State ex rel. Curators of University of Missouri v. Neill, Mo., 397 S.W.2d 666 ; Rathjen v. … See also Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill, 323 Mo. 180 , 19 S.W.2d 746 ; State ex rel. Merritt v. Gardner, 347 Mo. 569 , 148 S.W.2d 780 ; Cupples-Hesse Corporation v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad

    62 Mo. 490 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1876

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ewing v. Board of Education

    72 Mo. 436 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1880

    Here, not only is the corporate existence itself of the- Board of Education assailed on the ground that it was illegally organized, but the injurious action of the board against which relief is sought, is not merely threatened … Newmeyer v. Railroad Co., 52 Mo. 81 ; Overall v. Ruenzi, 67 Mo. 208 . The demurrer to the petition was properly sustained, and the judgment of the court dismissing the bill is affirmed.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Peck Co. v. Brown

    340 Mo. 1189 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 5, 1937

    Boyd v. Rutledge, 321 Mo. 1090 , 13 S. W. (2d) 1061 , l. c. 1065. Also, see, State ex rel. Younger v. Stratton, 136 Mo. 423 , 38 S. W. 83 ; State v. Taylor, 323 Mo. 15 , 18 S. W. (2d) 474 ; State ex rel. Wells v. … Kinloch Telephone Company v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Wright v. Board of Education

    295 Mo. 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 6, 1922

    Clark v. Osborne, 24 Mo. App. 309 .] In King v. … The rule in Bradford v. Board of Education, 18 Cal. App. 19 , was under an anti-fraternity statute of that State and, hence, is not controlling here. Wayland v. Board of School Directors, 43 Wash. 441 , 7 L. R. A. (N.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Board of Education

    65 Mo. 47 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1877

    This was a proceeding to enjoin a township *48 board of education, in Clinton County, from removing a school house in a certain sub-district, and from carrying into execution an order of said board, re-districting the township … It has been held in Illinois (Titus v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

    67 Mo. 122 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1877

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Bergmann v. Board of Education

    360 Mo. 644 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1950

    Brown v. Board of Education, 294 Mo. 106 , 242 S. W. 85 , 299 Mo. 465 , 253 S. … Wood v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, 357 Mo. 147 , 206 S.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.