Case law

Hacker v. Brown

81 Mo. 68 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

Brown oue note calling for $245.73, dated February 17th, 1873, due twenty days after date, for which note I sold him two notes on John Cooper and one certain abstract of a note on said Cooper, and the said Brown will proceed … to bi’ing suit on said notes, in order to foreclose a deed of mortgage given by Cooper to secure the payment of said notes, and I agree with the said Brown that if he fails to get a *70 judgment to tho amount of $2-1-5.73

Brown v. Massey

138 Mo. 519 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 3, 1897

In Dunn v. … Walker v. Walker, 88 Mo. 279 ; Hunt v. Rousmanier, 8 Wheat. 174 ; Barr v. Schroeder, 32 Cal. 609 ; Coffin v. Landis, 46 Pa. St. 431; Blackstone v. Buttermore, 53 Pa. St. 266; Hartley’s Appeal, 53 Pa. St. 212.

Wolf v. Brown

142 Mo. 612 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 16, 1898

Williams v. Hudson, 93 Mo. 524 ; Crosley v. Hutton, 98 Mo. 196 ; Graves v. Ewart, 99 Mo. 13 ; Childers v. Schantz, 120 Mo. 305 . The judgment for taxes under which defendants claim title being void, Lydia C. … Brown acquired no title by the sheriff’s sale, and of course could pass none to her grantees.

State v. Brown

386 S.W.2d 390 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 8, 1965

As to such a statement, we said in State v. … See also State v. Feltrop, Mo.Sup., 343 S.W.2d 36, 38 ; State v. Chamineak, Mo.Sup., 343 S.W.2d 153, 158 . We further note that the motion for new trial makes no reference to credibility ,or impeachment.

Stevenson v. Brown

264 Mo. 182 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 2, 1915

Brown, had, by mesne conveyances, acquired whatever title passed by this sheriff’s deed, and had paid the taxes thereon for the past ten years. … “In Gillingham v. Brown, 187 Mo. 181 , the true name of the defendant was Aubrey H. Gillingham. Publication was had against ‘A. II. Gillingham.’ The judgment was held had for want of jurisdiction. In Spore v.

Luther v. Brown

132 Mo. 70 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 24, 1895

Brown v. Howard

264 Mo. 501 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1915

In the case of Howard v. Brown, 197 Mo. l. c. 46, it was held that proof of publication against a nonresident was good when published on March 15, 22, 29 and April 5, returnable to. a term beginning on May 7. … No citation of authority is there made, but Haywood v. Russell and Cruzen v.

Steel v. Brown

19 Mo. 312 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1854

Brown, have this day bargained and sold to Mr. Joseph B. … Brown.” There are no particular words necessary to be used in order to constitute a warranty.

Brown v. Turner

60 Mo. 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1875

Brown v. Gibson

82 Mo. 529 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Dwight Laughlin v. Dewayne Perry and Ellen Flottman

Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 2020

See Gross v. … Ct. 1986) (holding public defenders have qualified immunity under Delaware’s state tort claims act and reaffir med by Browne v. Robb, 583 A.2d 949, 951 (Del. 1990), and Hanson v.

Price v. Brown

63 Mo. 347 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1876

Brown v. Brown's Administrator

68 Mo. 388 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1878

When this last desertion occurred, Brown had on the place a tenant named Hall, and at Brown’s request, after his wife left, Hall and his family moved into the house occupied by Brown, and Hall’s wife, superintended or performed … Brown only occupied a single room in the house.

Brown v. Gwin

197 Mo. 499 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1906

Brown, sometimes known as Mrs. … [Sweet v. Owens, 109 Mo. 1 ; Parker v. Vanhoozer, 142 Mo. l. c. 627; Griffin v. Miller, 188 Mo. l. c. 334.] *507 When plaintiff conveyed the land in snit to Mrs. Gwin, there was no town at this point.

Brown v. State

465 S.W.2d 563 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1971

the time the pleas were entered the assistant circuit attorney made the following statement concerning the occurrence (which defendant agreed was substantially correct): “On November 27, 1966, this defendant, Frederick Brown … In support of his contention defendant has cited State v. Bursby, Mo.Sup., 395 S.W.2d 155 , State v. Holland, Mo.Sup., 411 S.W.2d 181 , *568 and State v. Arnold, Mo.Sup., 419 S.W.2d 59 .

Mass v. Brown

7 Mo. 305 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1842

Mass sued Brown before a justice of the • peace, and obtained a judgment: from this judgment, Brown appealed to the circuit court; and that court deciding in favor of Brown, Mass appealed to this court. … On the trial of the cause in tjie circuit court, the appellant, Mass, gave iu evidence a promissory note, made to *306 by Brown, the Appellee.

Brown v. Fricke

1 Mo. 440 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1824

Among the papers filed by the Justice in the Circuit Court, was an account headed as follows : e< George Fricke to Rachel Brown, Dr. for washing and mending, &c.” … The plaintiff then offered to amend the said account, by heading it, "George Fricke to John Brown, Dr.;” which *313 was objected to and refused by the Court, to which decision the plaintiff excepted.

State v. Brown

41 Mo. 490 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1867

Gantt v. Brown

232 Mo. 390 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1911

Brown v. Howard

264 Mo. 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1915

B'rown and Paul Floyd became parties to the agreement of December 19', 1899, which is set out in haec verba in Howard v. Brown, 197 Mo. l. c. 42 et seq. That agreement provided that John G-. … Law, p. 679; Nalle v.