Case law

State v. Brown

312 Mo. 340 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 6, 1925

[Bower v. Daniel, 198 Mo. l. c. 317 and cases.] Other cases equally affirmatory of our limitations in appellate proceedings are: St. Charles ex rel. Budd v. Deemar, 174 Mo. 122 ; Scott v. Smelting Co., 187 Mo. … App. l. c. 356; Crossland v. Admire, 149 Mo. 650 ; Hill v. Combs, 92 Mo. App. 242 . In the Hill case, Smith, P.

Daniels v. Brown

266 S.W.2d 680 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1954

Roderick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 231 Mo.App. 852 , 98 S.W.2d 983, 984 ; London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Woelfle, 8 Cir., 83 F.2d 325, 337 , and cases therein cited. … Steuernagel v. St. Louis Public Service Co., 361 Mo. 1066 , 238 S.W.2d 426, 431 ; Wilhelm v. Haemmerle, Mo.Sup., 262 S.W. 2d 609, 612-613 .

Ray v. Brown

80 Mo. 230 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

The defendant Brown filed his separate answer claiming title in himself by virtue of a sheriff’s deed.

Burghart v. Brown

51 Mo. 600 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1873

William McCay was sworn and examined, who stated as follows : “ I was talking one day in Utica with plaintiff about defendant and his ability to pay a note that plaintiff said he had on him, (the one in controversy,) when Brown … would pay the other half.” *601 The plaintiff asked the witness to state “what answer (Brown) the defendant made to this proposition, if any, of plaintiff) to pursue the seller of the note.”

Charlton v. Brown

49 Mo. 353 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1872

Counsel have cited some New York cases, among which are Hill v. Crockford, 24 N. Y. 128 , and Morris v.

Brown v. McKown

265 Mo. 320 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 1, 1915

Brown, the plaintiff, the present wife of Clinton Brown, formerly the wife of Joel 0. … Jones, 143 Mo. 253 , l. c. 278, and Davidson v. Dockery, 179 Mo. 687 , l. c. 694.

Brown v. Barber

244 Mo. 138 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 20, 1912

Savage, 58 Mo. 248 ; Loewen v. Forsee, 137 Mo. 29 ; Truesdale v. Brennan, 153 Mo. 600 .] … [Clark v. Carter, 234 Mo. 90 ; Chrisman v. Linderman, 202 Mo. 605 ; Griffith v. Townley, 69 Mo. 13 .]

State v. Brown

206 Mo. 718 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1907

State v. Brown

60 Mo. 141 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1875

Brown v. Woody

98 Mo. 259 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1889

. — In Brown v.

Brown v. Rogers

125 Mo. 392 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 10, 1894

Brown), born June 5, 1855; Elizabeth (now wife of John C. Blakely), born March 11, 1858, who are the plaintiffs in this action. … This statute has been so construed in Clarkson v. Clarkson, ante, p. 381.

Burch v. Brown

46 Mo. 441 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1870

The only question in the record depends upon the construction to be given to the ninth section of the statute of wills, and that seems to have been definitely settled in the case of Bradley v. Bradley, 24 Mo. 311 . … This very section of the statute, which was numbered 11 in the code of 1845, received a thorough consideration and definite construction in Bradley v. Bradley, supra.

Gilker v. Brown

47 Mo. 105 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1870

(Wells v. Prince, 9 Mass. 508 ; Wallingford v. Head, 15 Mass. 471 ; Stevens v. Winship, 1 Pick. 327 ; Washb. Real Prop., ch. 30, § 375.) … The contrary doctrine seems to have been indicated in Keeton’s Heirs v. Keeton’s Adm’r, 20 Mo. 542 , in Reaume v. Chambers, 22 Mo. 54 -5, and in Schultz v. Lindell’s Heirs, 40 Mo. 330 . But in Callaway County v.

Applegate v. Brown

344 S.W.2d 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1961

“V. … Applegate v. Brown, 95 N.W.2d 341 .

State v. Brown

375 S.W.2d 126 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1964

State v. Andrews, Mo.Sup., 371 S.W.2d 324, 327 (4); State v. Washington, Mo.Sup., 364 S.W.2d 572, 574 (2); State v. Hadley, Mo.Sup., 364 S.W.2d 514, 516 (1). … As to specification 3, “[i]t is well established that circumstantial evidence is sufficient to support a conviction * * State v. Giden, Mo.Sup., 369 S.W.2d 212, 214 (4); State v.

Shirley v. Brown

80 Mo. 244 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

’s deed in the case of Burt against Gilson and Brown. … Bruce v. Vogel, 38 Mo. 100 ; Burney v. Boyett, 1 How. (Miss.) 39; Adams v. Dyer, 8 Johns. 347 ; Rockhill v. Hanna, 15 How. (U. S.) 189 ; Smith v. Lind, 29 Ill. 24 .

Brown v. Schackelford

53 Mo. 122 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1873

Brown, A. W. Morrison, John L. Morrison, the plaintiffs, arid one E. B. Butler, were engaged-as partners in putting up tobacco in Howard County, Missouri, and shipping the same to a foreign market for sale.

Brown v. Ward

1 Mo. 209 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1822

The principle involved in this case was decided by this Court at Fianklin, in the case of Baily v. Gentry and wife. This judgment is affirmed with costs.

Howard v. Brown

197 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 19, 1906

We have already held in the other case following Seidel v. … Joseph in all respects like that directed to be entered in Howard v. Brown, just decided, between the same parties affecting lot 4 of the same block. All concur.

State v. Brown

460 S.W.2d 551 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1970

The controlling cases, however, are Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 ; Coleman v. … State, Mo., 459 S.W.2d 378 ; State v.