Case law

Baugher v. Gamble Construction Co.

324 Mo. 1233 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 7, 1930

[Ashton v. Penfield, 233 Mo. 391 , l.c. 417, 135 S.W. 938 ; Hanson v. Neal, 215 Mo. 256 , 114 S.W. 1073 .] … In Heckfuss v.

O'Mellia v. Kansas City

115 Mo. 205 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1893

Gibson v. Railroad, 46 Mo. 163 ; Brothers v. Cartter, 52 Mo. 372 ; Gutridge v. Railroad, 105 Mo. 520 ; Hamilton v. Mining Co., 108 Mo. 364 ; Soeder v. Railroad, 100 Mo. 673 ; Mahaney v. Railroad, 108 Mo. 191 ; Huhn v. … Railroad v. Keenan, 103 Pa. St. 124.

State v. Thompson

465 S.W.2d 590 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1971

Defendant gives no reason why we should reconsider the decision in State v. Brown and return to the former rule, other than the suggestion that the decision in State v. … Stuver, Mo.Sup., 360 S.W.2d 89 , and State v. Gilbreath, 130 Mo. 500 , 32 S.W. 1023 , was fully analyzed and definitely repudiated in State v. Brown. And see State v.

State Ex Rel. Askew v. Kopp

330 S.W.2d 882 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 11, 1960

Aviation Services v. Board of Adjustment, 1956, 20 N.J. 275 , 119 A. 2d 761 , loe. cit. 766. This question is considered in Anno. … Helsel v. Board of County Commissioners, 1948, 149 Ohio St. 583 , 79 N.E.2d 911 ; a turnpike commission could establish a turnpike through territory zoned against turnpike use, State ex rel. Ohio Turnpike Commission v.

State ex rel. Thomas v. Treasurer of Callaway County

43 Mo. 228 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1869

(Caldwell v. Lockridge, 9 Mo. 358 ; Price v. Jackson Co., 15 Mo. 433 .) … Merritt v. Lawrence, 6 Hill, 244 ; The People v. *231 Edmonds, id. 472; The People v. Stout, id. 350; Baker v. Johnson, 41 Maine, 15.) What, then, is- the character of the claim which the treasurer refuses to pay?

Clark v. McBaine

299 Mo. 77 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1923

Law, 964, note c; Ellam v. Badger, 23 Ill. 498 ; Bray v. Callihan, 155 Mo. 43 ; Courtney v. Blackwell, 150 Mo. 245 ; Spears v. McCoy, 155 Ky. 1 ; Dixon v. Allen, 69 Cal. 527 ; Lindley v. Horton, 27 Conn. 58 ; Henry v. … Limitations, Ch. 12, p. 645; Odgers on Libel & Slander, p. 248; Cook v. Pub. Co., 241 Mo. l. c. 360; Sweeney v. Baker, 13 W. Va. 158 ; Callahan v. Ingram, 122 Mo. 365 .] Reinstatement: Privileged Comment. V.

State v. Achter

445 S.W.2d 318 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 13, 1969

Beck Brown, was driving at a speed of about 50 miles per hour in the right lane ahead. … Brown. Although there was no direct evidence that appellant was drunk at the time of the collision, the jury could believe that he had been drinking beer, a fact to be taken into consideration with other facts. State v.

Williams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

356 Mo. 967 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1947

Co. v. Burley, 327 U.S. 661 , 66 Sup. … Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell, 124 F.2d 235 ; Berryman v. Pullman Co., 48 F. Supp. 542 .

Glasgow v. Lindell's Heirs

50 Mo. 60 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1872

And the same may be said in regard to the cases of Milburn et al. v. Hardy, Milburn et al. v. Carpenter, Milburn et al. v. Blanchard, Milburn et al. v. McClure, and same v. Hogan, 28 Mo. 514 -23. … Schibel, 11 Mo. 167 ; Milburn v. Hortiz, 23 Mo. 536 ; Milburn et al. v. Hardy, 28 Mo. 514 ; Vasquez v. Ewing, 42 Mo. 247 ; also the following cases in the United States Supreme Court: Guitard v.

Smith v. Forrester-Nace Box Co.

193 Mo. 715 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1906

In Moore v. … In Lore v.

State ex rel. Turner v. Fitzgerald

44 Mo. 425 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1869

In Ewing v. Eilley (43 Penn. St. 386) the decision was upon the particular provisions of the statute of that State. … Lamb v. Lynd (44 Penn. St. 336) was a mandamus proceeding against the “ Select Council” of Philadelphia. The points decided are inapplicable to the present *429 litigation.

Henry v. Dulle

74 Mo. 443 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1881

Heiser, 60 Mo. 540 , and State ex rel. v. … School Directors v. School Directors, 73 Ill. 255 ; State ex rel. v. Board of Education, 64 Mo. 54 ; Long v. Joplin M. & S. Co., 68 Mo. 431 .

Dunkin v. State

478 S.W.2d 375 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1972

Maxwell v. State, Mo. Sup., 459 S.W.2d 388, 392 [2]; Mitchell v. State, Mo.Sup., 447 S.W.2d 281, 283 [1]; McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 , 90 S.Ct. 1441 , 25 L.Ed.2d 763 . … Even if appellant’s testimony is believed, the statement he attributed to Brown is not such as would be a basis for attacking the plea. United States v.

Hammerslough v. Cheatham

84 Mo. 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Summers, at whose house he *16 was then boarding, and informed her about this money. He stated to her that the amount was about $1800. … Ev. 297; Cook v. Brown, 34 N. H. 460, 476; Huey v. Huey, 65 Mo. 689, 693, 694 . Crediting the testimony of the defendant and her daughter, who are the only witnesses speaking to what occurred between Mrs.

State ex rel. Rife v. Hawes

177 Mo. 360 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 3, 1903

Heaven v. … Campbell v. Board of Police Commissioners, 14 Mo. App. 308 ; s. c., 88 Mo. 144 , while the claim of Marcus Blair is founded largely upon the ease of State ex rel. Chapman v. Walbridge, 153 Mo. 194 .

Bresler v. Tietjen

424 S.W.2d 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1968

Lentine v. State Board of Health, 334 Mo. 220 , 65 S.W.2d 943 , Rust v. Missouri Dental Board, 348 Mo. 616 , 155 S.W.2d 80 , and Hughes v. State Board of Health, 348 Mo. 1236 , 159 S.W.2d 277 . … See, for purposes of comparison, People v. Dubin, 367 Ill. 229 , 10 N.E.2d 809 , and Reyburn v. Minnesota State Board of Optometry, 247 Minn. 520 , 78 N.W.2d 351 .

Butz v. Murch Bros. Construction Co.

199 Mo. 279 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 21, 1906

[Huhn v. Railroad, 92 Mo. 440 ; Soeder v. Railroad, 100 Mo. 673 ; O’Mellia v. Railroad, 115 Mo. 221 ; Francis v. Railroad, 127 Mo. 669 ; Bradley v. Railroad, 138 Mo. 302 ; Doyle v. Trust Co., 140 Mo. 1 ; Hamman v. … Coal Co., 156 Mo. 232 ; Pauck v. Beef Co., 159 Mo. 467 ; Grattis v. Railroad, 153 Mo. 380 ; Connolly v. Printing Co., 166 Mo. 463 ; Minnier v. Railroad, 167 Mo. 112 ; Holmes v. Brandenbaugh, 172 Mo. 66 ; Haviland v.

Bauer v. Transitional School District of City of St. Louis

111 S.W.3d 405 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 2003

Louis Board of Education as a defendant. … State v. Tisius, 92 S.W.3d 751, 770 (Mo. banc 2002); Rundquist v. Director of Revenue, 62 S.W.3d 643, 646 (Mo.App.2001); Kersting v. Director of Revenue, 792 S.W.2d 651, 652-53 (Mo.App.1990).

City of St. Louis v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.

317 Mo. 907 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1927

Louis v. … Louis v. Fischer is opposed to the ruling in St. Louis v. Russell. The ruling in Hays v. Poplar Bluff follows the Russell case, and disapproves the ruling in the Fischer case.

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Cone

338 S.W.2d 22 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1960

See Pierce v. New York Central R. … Teters v.