Case law

Seventy-Ninth Street Improvement Corp. v. Ashley

509 S.W.2d 121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1974

However, in Brown v. … We consider this case to be governed by the rule set forth in Brown v. Weare, supra, and that the predecessors of defendants received an easement for right of way only.

State ex rel. Murphy v. Burney

269 Mo. 602 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 29, 1917

It is likewise clear that in hearing such complaints the Board of Police Commissioners sit and act not in judicial capacities, but in administrative capacities. [State ex rel. Heimburger v. Wells, 210 Mo. 601 .] … We must assume that the individual members of the Board of Police Commissioners will honestly, properly and efficiently perform the duties saddled upon them by statute (State ex rel. v. Wells, supra; State ex rel. v.

State Ex Rel. Whiteman v. James

364 Mo. 589 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 8, 1954

Columbia National Bank v. Davis, 314 Mo. 373 , 284 S.W. 464 ; State ex rel. Henning v. Williams, 345 Mo. 22 , 131 S.W. 2d 561 ; State ex rel. O’Keefe v. Brown, 361 Mo. 618 , 235 S.W. 2d 304 . … O’Keefe v. Brown, 361 Mo. 618 , 235 S.W. 2d 304 .

Bernhardt v. Long

357 Mo. 427 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1948

Since the law does not require the board or secretary to furnish the ballots, the ballot prepared and furnished by the board had no official attribute except that it was furnished by the board. In Armantrout v. … V, Sec. 3, Const. State ex rel. Worsham v. Ellis et al., supra.

Harfst v. Hoegen

349 Mo. 808 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1942

R. 841. 11 Dritt v. Snodgrass, 66 Mo. 286 . 12 Wright v. Board of Education, 295 Mo. 466 , 246 S. W. 43 . 13 Gebhardt v. Heidt, 66 N. D. 444 , 267 N. W. 128 ; Kaplan v. School District, 171 Minn. 142 , 214 N. … Baumhover, supra; Cook County v. Chicago Industrial School for Girls, 125 Ill. 540 , 18 N. E. 183 , 1 L. R. A. 437; and see “Schools,” 24 R. C. L., Sec. 49. 16 Millard v. Board of Education, 121 Ill. 297 , 267 N.

State Ex Rel. Nigro v. Kansas City

325 Mo. 95 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1930

[State v. Christopher, 317 Mo. 1179, 1196 , 298 S. W. 720 .] … as in its opinion the board should have made.

School District v. Evans

363 Mo. 208 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1952

Jones v. Brown, 338 Mo. 448 , 92 S. W. (2d) 718 . … City of Excelsior Springs v. Smith, 336 Mo. 1104 , 82 S. W. (2d) 37 , in support of appellants’ contention.

State Ex Rel. Sanders v. Cervantes

480 S.W.2d 888 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 8, 1972

Heaven v. … In that connection, we mention Kizior v. City of St. Joseph, Mo., 329 S.W.2d 605 , Atchison v. Retirement Board of Police Retire. System, Mo., 343 S.W.2d 25 , State ex rel. Breshears v.

Neske v. City of St. Louis

218 S.W.3d 417 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 2007

Defender Comm’n v. … Field v.

State Ex Rel. Stoyanoff v. Berkeley

458 S.W.2d 305 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 14, 1970

Architectural Board of Review of the City of Cleveland Heights, 119 Ohio App. 67 , 192 N.E.2d 74, 77 ; and Oregon City v. … Like holdings were made involving Architectural Board ordinances in State ex rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. Wieland, 269 Wis. 262 , 69 N.W.2d 217 , and Reid v.

Glasgow v. Lindell's Heirs

50 Mo. 60 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1872

And the same may be said in regard to the cases of Milburn et al. v. Hardy, Milburn et al. v. Carpenter, Milburn et al. v. Blanchard, Milburn et al. v. McClure, and same v. Hogan, 28 Mo. 514 -23. … Schibel, 11 Mo. 167 ; Milburn v. Hortiz, 23 Mo. 536 ; Milburn et al. v. Hardy, 28 Mo. 514 ; Vasquez v. Ewing, 42 Mo. 247 ; also the following cases in the United States Supreme Court: Guitard v.

Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill

323 Mo. 180 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 29, 1929

The county board of equalization was powerless to grant appellant; relief (State v. … In Laclede Land & Improvement Co. v.

St. Joseph Fire & Marine Insurance v. Leland

90 Mo. 177 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

Appellant’s counsel cite cases in other states similar to that of Vawter v. … Leonard v. Columbia Steam Navigation Company, 84 N. Y. 48 ; McDonald v. Mallory, 77 N. Y. 547 .

State ex rel. Gottlieb v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

165 Mo. 502 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1901

S. 143 ; Balfour v. City of Portland, 28 Fed. 738 ; *516 Trustees of Cincinnati So. Railroad v. Guenther, 19 Fed. 395 ; Railroad v. Board, etc., 67 Fed. 411 ; Railroad v. Board, 54 Kansas, 781; Stanley v. … Board, 67 Fed. 411 .

Williams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

356 Mo. 967 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 8, 1947

Co. v. Burley, 327 U.S. 661 , 66 Sup. … Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell, 124 F.2d 235 ; Berryman v. Pullman Co., 48 F. Supp. 542 .

State v. Murray

280 S.W.2d 809 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1955

See: State v. Clark, Mo., 277 S.W.2d 593 ; State v. Brown, 339 Mo. 1014 , 98 S.W.2d 777 ; State v. Loyd, Mo., 233 S.W.2d 658 ; State v. Mosley, Mo., 119 S.W.2d 297 ; State v. Porter, Mo., 81 S.W.2d 316 ; State v. … further that these documents showed that the defendant pleaded guilty in the State of Kansas to “felonious assault” and was sentenced to the Kansas State Reformatory, from which he was transferred by order of the Kansas Board

Heger v. City of St. Louis

323 Mo. 1031 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 4, 1929

In sustaining such right the court cited French v. Quincy, 3 Allen, 9 , and Worden v. New Bedford, 131 Mass. 23 , 41 Am. … In Bryant v. Logan, 56 W. Va. 141 , 3 Am. Eng. Ann.

Chapin v. Cherry

243 Mo. 375 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1912

[Green v. Cole, 103 Mo. 70 ; Sutter v. Raeder, 149 Mo. 297 .] Arid as held by this court in the case of Strange v. … [Price v. Edwards, 11 Mo. 524 .]

State ex rel. Bybee v. Hackmann

276 Mo. 110 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1918

[Lamar Twp. v. Lamar, 261 Mo. 171 .] … [Hannibal, etc., Railroad v. Marion Co., 36 Mo. 303 ; Walker v. Linn Co., 72 Mo. 650 ; Sheidley v. Lynch, 95 Mo. 487 .]

STATE EX REL. ZOOLOGICAL PK. SUBD. ST. LOUIS v. Jordan

521 S.W.2d 369 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1975

The court *372 also ruled in favor of the District Board on Counts II and III. The basic rule of construction of a statute is to seek the intention of the legislature, Julian v. … King v. Priest, 357 Mo. 68 , 206 S.W.2d 547 (1947).