Case law

Preisler v. Doherty

364 Mo. 596 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1954

Barrett v. Hitchcock, 241 Mo. 433 , 146 S. … W. (2) 315, Morris v. Wrightson, 56 N. J. Law 126, 28 Atl. 56 , Jones v. Freeman, supra.

State Ex Rel. Dolman v. Dickey

280 Mo. 536 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1920

Hutton v. Scott County Court, 197 S.W. 347 -8; State ex rel. Forgrave v. Hill, 198 S.W. 844 , l.c. 846.] It was held that mandamus would not lie directing the Board of Public Works of the City of St. … [State ex rel. v. Dreyer, 183 Mo. App. l.c. 469-70; State ex rel. Hathaway v. State Board of Health, 103 Mo. 22 , l.c. 29; State ex rel. v. Public Schools, 134 Mo. 296 , l.c. 311.] In State ex rel. McCleary v.

State v. Armstrong

203 Mo. 554 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1907

[State v. Meyers, 99 Mo. l. c. 119; State v. Patterson, 73 Mo. 695 ; State v. Hopkirk, 84 Mo. 278 .] … [State v. Jones, 171 Mo. l. c. 406; State v. Brennan, 164 Mo. 487 ; State v. Guy, 69 Mo. l. c. 432; State v. Simon, 50 Mo. l. c. 372.] We deem it unnecessary to discuss the testimony developed at the trial.

Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Field

188 Mo. 182 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 25, 1905

[Verdin v. St. Louis, 131 Mo. 26 ; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Hunt, 100 Mo. 22 ; Swift v. St. Louis, 180 Mo. 80 .] … In Nagel v.

State v. Linder

412 S.W.2d 412 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1967

State of Tennessee, 322 U.S. 143 , 64 S.Ct. 921 , 88 L.Ed. 1192 ; Brown v. State of Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 ; Stroble v. … State v. Brown, Mo., 404 S.W.2d 179, 182 . There is certainly in his testimony nothing that would seriously refute the essence of the substantive offense of burglary.

Binz v. Hyatt

200 Mo. 299 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1906

Brown, Trustee.” … [State ex rel. v. Tittmann, 134 Mo. l. c. 168; Tenny v. Lasley, 80 Mo. l. c. 668; Burton v. Rutherford, 49 Mo. l. c. 258; Taylor v. Priest, 21 Mo. App. l. c. 687; Morgan v. Gibson, 42 Mo. App. l. c. 244.]

Robins v. Latham

134 Mo. 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1896

In Bigelow v. … See, also, Smith v. Readfield, 27 Me. 145; Mayor, etc., v. Lefferman, 4 Gill. 425; Mays v. Cincinnati, 1 Ohio St. 268 . So in Sheldon v.

State Ex Rel. Field v. Smith

329 Mo. 1019 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1932

[American Fire Alarm Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners, 285 Mo. 581, 591 , 227 S. W. 114 .] … The attempted delegation to the board of police of the power to create such offices is clearly void. [State ex rel. v. Smiley, 304 Mo. 549, 557 , 263 S. W. 825 ; State ex rel. v. Mason, 153 Mo. 23, 48 , 54 S. W. 524 .]

State Ex Rel. Lane v. Corneli

347 Mo. 932 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 18, 1941

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 64 Mo. 294 , 308; State ex rel. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Neaf, supra ( 346 Mo. 86 , 139 S.W.2d 958 , 962).] … Harrison County Bank v. Springer, supra; State ex rel. Ball v. State Board of Health, 325 Mo. 41 , 26 S.W.2d 773 , 775.]

State ex rel. Governor Michael L. Parson, Relator v. The Honorable Cotton Walker

Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 2024

Dorsey v. … Oliver v.

Jones v. State

471 S.W.2d 166 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971

There is no showing that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole has any such policy or that it permits any prisoners to be represented by counsel at the hearing. Actually, Earnest v. … Fleming v. Tate, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 156 F.2d 848 (1946); Washington v. Hagan, 287 F.2d 332 (3rd Cir. 1960); Lavendera v. Taylor, 347 F.2d 989 (10th Cir. 1966); Gonzales v.

Devine v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.

349 Mo. 621 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 5, 1942

[Lambert v. Jones, supra; Stith v. Newberry Co., supra; Orcutt v. Century Bldg. Co., 201 Mo. 424 , 99 S.W. 1062 ; Schneider v. Dubinsky Realty Co., 344 Mo. 654 , 127 S.W.2d 691 ; Guthrie v. … [Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 334 Mo. 517 , 66 S.W.2d 903 ; Morris v. Terminal Railroad Co., 320 Mo. 371 , 8 S.W.2d 11 .]

Boone Ex Rel. Ferry v. Danforth

463 S.W.2d 825 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1971

Moore v. Ogilvie, 394 U.S. 814 , 89 S.Ct. 1493 , 23 L.Ed.2d 1 ; Pierce v. La Valle, 2 Cir., 293 F.2d 233 ; Friend v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 323 , 388 F.2d 579 ; Matthews v. … For example, in Sonnenberg v.

Poston v. Balch

69 Mo. 115 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1878

Sir Joseph Jekyll, in the case of Osmond v. … Isherwood, 1 Brown Ch. 562, the chancellor directed a jury to say whether the consideration was adequate or not.

Whittington v. Westport Hotel Operating Co.

326 Mo. 1117 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1930

[Gettys v. American Car Foundry Co., 16 S.W.2d 85 ; Koonse v. Mo. Pac. Railroad Co., 18 S.W.2d 467 .] … The facts in the case of Mathis v.

Webb & Hepp v. Browning & Bushnell

14 Mo. 354 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1851

The appellees, Browning and Bushnell, partners, doing business under the name and style of Browning & Bushnell, brought their action of assumpsit against the defendants, Alexander F. W. … 'i; v. js’v*. ■ < ihfo ■'■>> ' ..hiniiffs. The ” - motion for a new trial, which was *356 overruled, excepted to and the defendants bring the ease here by appeal. It appears from the bill of exceptions that W. II.

State Ex Rel. Phillip v. Public School Retirement System

364 Mo. 395 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 16, 1953

Ball v. Board of Trustees of Teachers’ Retirement Fund, 71 N.J. Law 64, 58 A. 111 ; Raines v. Board of Trustees of Ill. State Teachers Pension and Retirement Fund, 365 Ill. 610 , 7 N.E. (2d) 489, 491; Ridgley v. … Stafford v. State Annuity & Investment Board, 219 Wis. 31 , 261 N.W. 718, 719 ; Clarke v. Ireland, 122 Mont. 191 , 199 P. (2d) 965, 969 ; Retirement Board v. McGovern, 316 Pa. 161 , 174 A. 400, 404 ; Driggs v.

Jones v. DeWitt

499 S.W.2d 524 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 10, 1973

Brown, one share. Brown was the DeWitts’ accountant. … Drake v. Hicks, supra.

Mercantile Trust Co. v. Davis

522 S.W.2d 798 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1975

Justices, etc. v. Prewett, 20 Mo. 165 (1854), and Campbell v. … Neither Brown, supra, nor the instant case involves any question regarding the state of the law as to adopted children. See Graves v. Graves, 349 Mo. 722 , 163 S.W.2d 544 (1942); Kindred v.

State v. Gresham

637 S.W.2d 20 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 23, 1982

In State v. … We glean from State v.