Case law

State Ex Rel. Phillip v. Public School Retirement System

364 Mo. 395 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 16, 1953

Ball v. Board of Trustees of Teachers’ Retirement Fund, 71 N.J. Law 64, 58 A. 111 ; Raines v. Board of Trustees of Ill. State Teachers Pension and Retirement Fund, 365 Ill. 610 , 7 N.E. (2d) 489, 491; Ridgley v. … Stafford v. State Annuity & Investment Board, 219 Wis. 31 , 261 N.W. 718, 719 ; Clarke v. Ireland, 122 Mont. 191 , 199 P. (2d) 965, 969 ; Retirement Board v. McGovern, 316 Pa. 161 , 174 A. 400, 404 ; Driggs v.

Jones v. State

471 S.W.2d 166 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971

There is no showing that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole has any such policy or that it permits any prisoners to be represented by counsel at the hearing. Actually, Earnest v. … Fleming v. Tate, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 156 F.2d 848 (1946); Washington v. Hagan, 287 F.2d 332 (3rd Cir. 1960); Lavendera v. Taylor, 347 F.2d 989 (10th Cir. 1966); Gonzales v.

State v. Rogers

253 Mo. 399 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1913

[Gaston v. … This doctrine is supported by the following authorities: State v. Rutherford, 152 Mo. 124 , l. c. *414 133; State v. Reed, 137 Mo. l. c. 138; State v. Hibler, 149 Mo. 478 ; State v. Mitchell, 229 Mo. 683 , and State v.

State Ex Rel. Zevely v. Hackmann

300 Mo. 59 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 28, 1923

[Citing Shelby v. Alcorn, 36 Miss. 273 ; People v. Hayes, 7 How. Prac. (N. Y.) 248; State v. Valle, 41 Mo, 29; 2 Cow. (N. Y.) 13, 29, note B; People v. Bedell, 2 Hill (N. Y.) 196; People v. Lee, 28 Hun (N. … The mere fact that the statute required the secretary to sign the records of the Board of Equalization is practically a legislative interpretation that he was an officer of that board. [State ex rel. Mosconi v.

State Ex Rel. Lane v. Corneli

347 Mo. 932 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 18, 1941

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 64 Mo. 294 , 308; State ex rel. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Neaf, supra ( 346 Mo. 86 , 139 S.W.2d 958 , 962).] … Harrison County Bank v. Springer, supra; State ex rel. Ball v. State Board of Health, 325 Mo. 41 , 26 S.W.2d 773 , 775.]

Myers v. Bassett

84 Mo. 479 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Brown, on Ms application, was made a co-defendant, and filed his separate answer setting out Ms title. The Bassetts filed a joint answer which was a general denial. … In the cases of Stafford v. Kizer, 82 Mo. 393 , and Gitchell v.

Raymond v. Fisher

6 Mo. 29 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 15, 1839

Whether the decision in Freeman v Adams was well supported by authority or not, it goes clearly to shew the opinion, entertained by the New York court, of th« grounds on which the case of Brown v Goodman and th® cases in … R. 1190, and Brown vs Goodman in note to same case Freeman^ ts Adams 9 J. R. 115, Jewell v Schroppel, 4 Cowen 564; Lang-worth and Clark vs Smith, 2 Mend, 587 Stutivell v Miles 2 Marsh, 425.

Dalton v. Simpson

270 Mo. 287 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1917

In Simpson v. … [Rhorer v. Brockhage, 86 Mo. 544 ; Simpson v. Scroggins, 182 Mo. l. c. 571, 574; Quail v. Lomas, 200 Mo. l. c. 687.]” That ease coincides in all respects with the one before us. It comments on Beckner v.

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Bates

317 Mo. 696 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 27, 1927

[U’Ren v. State Board of Control, 31 Cal. App. l. c. 12; R. G. Packard Co. v. Commissioners of the Palisades Interstate Park, 240 Fed. 543 -544; Bromwell Brush & Wire Co. v. … State Board of Charities and Corrections, 279 Fed. 440 , et seq: Watkins Boating Co. v. State, 175 N. Y. Supp. 310 ; County Board of Education v. State Board of Education, 106 N. C. 81 .] Tn the last case, supra (106 N.

State Ex Rel. Cavallaro v. Groose

908 S.W.2d 133 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 24, 1995

Ingrassia v. Purkett, 985 F.2d 987, 988 (8th Cir.1993); Maggard v. Wyrick, 800 F.2d 195, 198 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1068 , 107 S.Ct. 958 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1006 (1987); Green v. … The Board denied Cavallaro parole release based on the “seriousness of the offense.” This is a valid reason under either the old or new statute. Cooper v.

Calumet Paper Co. v. Haskell Show Printing Co.

144 Mo. 331 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1898

Ellingwood, 86 Mo. 260 ; Descombes v. Wood, 91 Mo. 196 ); but it must be done by resolution of the board. … board.

Harfst v. Hoegen

349 Mo. 808 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1942

R. 841. 11 Dritt v. Snodgrass, 66 Mo. 286 . 12 Wright v. Board of Education, 295 Mo. 466 , 246 S. W. 43 . 13 Gebhardt v. Heidt, 66 N. D. 444 , 267 N. W. 128 ; Kaplan v. School District, 171 Minn. 142 , 214 N. … Baumhover, supra; Cook County v. Chicago Industrial School for Girls, 125 Ill. 540 , 18 N. E. 183 , 1 L. R. A. 437; and see “Schools,” 24 R. C. L., Sec. 49. 16 Millard v. Board of Education, 121 Ill. 297 , 267 N.

Saunders v. Reorganized School District No. 2 of Osage County

520 S.W.2d 29 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1975

Brooks v. School District of City of Moberly et al. (CA 8), 267 F.2d 733 (1959); Long v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis (CA 8), 456 F.2d 1058 (1972). In Calvin v. … The case of Board of Registration of the Healing Arts v.

Poston v. Balch

69 Mo. 115 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1878

Sir Joseph Jekyll, in the case of Osmond v. … Isherwood, 1 Brown Ch. 562, the chancellor directed a jury to say whether the consideration was adequate or not.

State Ex Rel. Stoyanoff v. Berkeley

458 S.W.2d 305 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 14, 1970

Architectural Board of Review of the City of Cleveland Heights, 119 Ohio App. 67 , 192 N.E.2d 74, 77 ; and Oregon City v. … Like holdings were made involving Architectural Board ordinances in State ex rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. Wieland, 269 Wis. 262 , 69 N.W.2d 217 , and Reid v.

FOSTER BROS. MPG. CO. v. State Tax Commission of Mo.

319 S.W.2d 590 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1958

Article V, Section 3, Constitution of Missouri 1945, V.A.M.S.; State ex rel. Lindell Tower Apartments v. Guise, 357 Mo. 50 , 206 S.W.2d 320 . … Louis) boards of equalization. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Schramm, 269 Mo. 489 , 190 S.W. 886 .

State Ex Rel. Sanders v. Cervantes

480 S.W.2d 888 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 8, 1972

Heaven v. … In that connection, we mention Kizior v. City of St. Joseph, Mo., 329 S.W.2d 605 , Atchison v. Retirement Board of Police Retire. System, Mo., 343 S.W.2d 25 , State ex rel. Breshears v.

State v. Bryson

506 S.W.2d 358 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1974

He opened the brown paper and found a plastic syringe with a needle and some tablets soaking in a yellow watery substance. … In State v.

Madden v. C & K Barbecue Carryout, Inc.

758 S.W.2d 59 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1988

See Faheen v. City Parking Corp, 734 S.W.2d 270, 272 (Mo.App.1987); Brown v. National Supermarkets, Inc., 679 S.W.2d 307, 309 (Mo.App.1984); and Nappier v. Kincade, 666 S.W.2d 858, 861 (Mo.App.1984). … Brown, 679 S.W.2d at 309-10 . In Virginia D. v.

Webb & Hepp v. Browning & Bushnell

14 Mo. 354 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1851

The appellees, Browning and Bushnell, partners, doing business under the name and style of Browning & Bushnell, brought their action of assumpsit against the defendants, Alexander F. W. … 'i; v. js’v*. ■ < ihfo ■'■>> ' ..hiniiffs. The ” - motion for a new trial, which was *356 overruled, excepted to and the defendants bring the ease here by appeal. It appears from the bill of exceptions that W. II.