Case law

State v. Linder

412 S.W.2d 412 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1967

State of Tennessee, 322 U.S. 143 , 64 S.Ct. 921 , 88 L.Ed. 1192 ; Brown v. State of Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 ; Stroble v. … State v. Brown, Mo., 404 S.W.2d 179, 182 . There is certainly in his testimony nothing that would seriously refute the essence of the substantive offense of burglary.

Jensen v. Wilson Township

346 Mo. 1199 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1940

[Missouri Township, Chariton County, v. Farmers' Board of Forest Green, 328 Mo. 868 , 42 S. W. (2d) 353 .] … [Mann v. Bank of Greenfield, 323 Mo. 1000 , 20 S. W. (2d) 502 ; Williams v. Walker; 333 Mo. 322 , 62 S. W. (2d) 840 ; Barlow v. Scott (Mo.), 85 S. W. (2d) 504 ; Fancher v. Prock, 337 Mo. 1119 , 88 S.

Polk Tp., Sullivan County v. Spencer

364 Mo. 97 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1953

In Nodaway County v. … Witmer v. Nichols, supra; Smith v. Hendricks, supra; Smith v. Dandridge, supra; Seaman v. Cap-Au-Gris Levee Dist., supra; Sparks v. Jasper County, 213 Mo. 218 , 112 S. W. 265 ; Inhabitants df Schell City v. Rumsey Mfg.

Fort Osage Drainage District of Jackson County v. Jackson County

275 S.W.2d 326 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 14, 1955

In Spitcaufsky v. … City of Republic v. Smith, supra; Kansas City v. McTernan, 308 Mo. 494 , 273 S.W. 105 ; Perkins v. Fielding, supra.

Deuser v. St. Louis County

354 Mo. 5 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 4, 1945

McKittrick v. Carolene Products Co. (Banc), 346 Mo. 1049 , 1059, 144 S.W.2d 153 , 156; State ex rel. Equality Sav. Bldg. Ass'n v. Brown (Banc), 334 Mo. 781 , 787, 68 S.W.2d 55 , 58 (4-7); Gilkeson v. … Cas. 763; State v. Mangiareina, 344 Mo. 99 , 103(1), 125 S.W.2d 58 , 60(1, 2); Schott v. Continental Auto Ins. Underwriters, 326 Mo. 92 , 100, 31 S.W.2d 7 , 11(1).

MISSOURI STATE MEDICAL ASS'N v. State

256 S.W.3d 85 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 24, 2008

Browning, Jefferson City, for amicus curiae National Association of Certified Professional Midwives, Midwives Alliance of North America, Citizens for Midwifery, Birth Policy Coalition. Leonard A. Nelson, Barat S. … City of Wellston v. SBC Commc'ns, Inc., 203 S.W.3d 189, 190 (Mo. banc 2006). Because standing is a question of law, review of the issue on appeal is de novo. Verni v.

State Ex Rel. Priest v. Gunn

326 S.W.2d 314 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 13, 1959

Mackey v. … Hawes v. Mason, 153 Mo. 23 , 54 S.W. 524 ) and its agency, the Board, may not use tax funds for local purposes.

Wilson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

362 Mo. 1168 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1952

The plaintiff had the right of election, to proceed before the board or "to file this suit at common law (Moore v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 312 U. S. 630 , 61 S. Ct. 754 , 85 L. … Parkell v. Fitzporter, supra; Ash v. Mortensen, (Cal.) 150 P. (2) 876; Wheat v. Carter, 79 N. H. 150, 106 Atl. 602 .

Ex Parte Hernreich v. Quinn

350 Mo. 770 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 1, 1943

Louis Court of Appeals in Berard v. Board of Adjustment et al., 138 S. W. (2d) 731 . Basically, the issues involve a construction of certain provisions of Art. 12, Chap. 38, Secs. 7412-7423, R. S. 1939, same, Mo. R. S. … Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. St. Louis, 341 Mo. 689, 694 (3), 108 S. W. (2d) 143, 144 (4). Testimony *776 in proceedings before the Board is taken by a reporter and preserved.

State Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. Briscoe

451 S.W.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1970

Donnell v. Osburn, banc, 347 Mo. 469 , 147 S.W.2d 1065, 1066 , 136 A.L.R. 667 ; State ex rel. Slinkard v. … This court has held the action of the state board in fixing assessment values is judicial in character, not subject to collateral attack, State ex rel. Johnson v.

State ex inf. Crow v. Aetna Insurance

150 Mo. 113 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 30, 1899

[State ex rel. v. Herrmann, 75 Mo. loc. cit. 354; Lynch v. Murphy, 119 Mo. 163 .] In State ex rel. v. … [Ewing v. Hoblitzelle, 85 Mo. 64 ; Rutherford v. Heddens, 82 Mo. 388 ; State ex rel. v. Herrmann, 75 Mo. 340 ; Kelly v. Meeks, 87 Mo. 396 ; Rutherford v. Hamilton, 97 Mo. 543 ; Lynch v. Murphy, 119 Mo. 163 .]

Spiking School District No. 71 v. Purported "Enlarged School District R-II

362 Mo. 848 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1952

Black v. Early, 208 Mo. 281, 303 , 106 S. W. 1014 ; Burnham v. Rogers, 167 Mo. 17, 21 , 66 S. W. 970 ; Kayser v. Trustees of Bremen, 16 Mo. 88, 90 ; State ex rel. Smith v. Gardner, supra. … Barker v. Smith, 271 Mo. 168 , 196 S. W. 17 ; State ex rel. Consolidated School District No. 2 Clinton County v. Hunt, supra; Bonderer v. Hall, supra, 205 S. W. 542 ; State ex rel. Smith v. Gardner, supra, 204 S.

State ex rel. O'Bannon v. Cole

220 Mo. 697 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 22, 1909

In the very recent case of People v. Board of Education, 234 Ill. l. c. 425, the doctrine of the Potts case is thus stated: “In the case of Potts v. … Cox v. Board of Education, 21 Utah l. c. 414 and 415.

Kirby v. Nolte

351 Mo. 525 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 20, 1943

See State ex inf. v. Kirby, 349 Mo. 988 , 163 S. W. (2d) 990 ; Kirby v. Nolte, 349 Mo. 1015 , 164 S. W. (2d) 1 ; State ex rel. v. Kirby, 349 Mo. 1010 , 163 S. W. (2d) 964 . … Among them are the following: Article V, Section 26. “The board of aldermen shall not have power ... to acquire real estate by private purchase except by ordinance recommended by the board of public service.”

State ex rel. Douglas v. Tune

273 Mo. 255 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 2, 1918

It reads as follows: “This is an original proceeding by mandamus to compel the members of the Board of Complaint in the City of St. … “The Board of Complaint was created by the Charter of the city of St. Louis, and by that authority it receives complaints against officers and employees of the city.

City of St. Louis v. Handlan

242 Mo. 88 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1912

Jones may like straight lines; Brown, curves; Smith, broken lines. … Thereto all the lexicographers agree (q. v.).

Robins v. Latham

134 Mo. 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1896

In Bigelow v. … See, also, Smith v. Readfield, 27 Me. 145; Mayor, etc., v. Lefferman, 4 Gill. 425; Mays v. Cincinnati, 1 Ohio St. 268 . So in Sheldon v.

Hammond's Administratrix v. Cadwallader

29 Mo. 166 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1859

The case 'of Brown v. Dyrenger, 1 Rawle, 413 ; McCulloch v. Cowhe, 5 W. & S. 431 ; Lees v. Nuttall, 1 Russell & Mylne, 53; Kisler v. Kisler, 2 Watts, 427 , and Schmidt v. Gatewood, 2 Rich. … (Robertson v. Robertson, 9 Watts, 36 ; Haines v. O’Connor, 10 Watts, 320 ; Fox v. Heffner, 1 Serg. & R. 376; Lloyd v. Spillet, 2 Atk. 148.)

Sheehan v. First National Bank

346 Mo. 227 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1940

Soc. v. Schoen (Mo.), 93 S.W.2d 669 ; State ex rel. Equality Sav. Bldg. Assn. v. Brown, 334 Mo. 781 , 68 S.W.2d 55 , and cases cited; Kingshighway Presbyterian Church v. … Missouri State Board of Agriculture v. Woods, 317 Mo. 403 , 296 S.W. 381 ; and the many other cases cited in 7 Mo. Digest, 254-257, sec. 42.]

Saleno v. City of Neosho

27 L.R.A. 769 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 19, 1895

Beard v. City of Hopkinsville, 24 S. W. Rep. 872 ; Spilman v. Parkersburg, 14 S. E. Rep. 279 ; East St. Louis v. East St. Louis, etc., Co., 98 Ill. 451 ; Springfield v. Edwards, 84 Ill. 626 ; Law v. … Cedar Falls, 27 Iowa, 227 ; Grant v. Davenport, 36 Iowa, 401 ; Budd v. Budd, 59 Fed. Rep. 735; Water Co. v. Walla Walla, 60 Fed. Rep. 957; State v. McCauley, 15 Cal. 429 ; Koppikus v.