Case law

Schnurbusch ex rel. Frye v. Bohnert

395 S.W.2d 460 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1965

Brown, trustee under such deed of trust. … The County Board of Equalization reduced the assessed valuation to $1,800 in July, 1954.

State Ex Rel. City of St. Louis v. Caulfield

333 Mo. 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 24, 1933

McCune v. Carter, 279 Mo. 304 , 214 S. W. 180 ; State ex rel. Heimburger v. Wells, 210 Mo. 601 , 109 S. W. 758 ; Ward v. Board of Equalization, 135 Mo. 309 , 36 S. W. 648 ; State ex rel. Harrah v. Cauthorn, 40 Mo. … In Thaw v. Ritchie (D.

Clark v. Atchison & Eastern Bridge Co.

333 Mo. 721 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 24, 1933

rails, with the result that the north rail was some two to four inches higher than the level of the board flooring. … [Browning v. Wabash Western Railroad Co., 124 Mo. 55 , 71, 27 S.W. 644 ; Hulsey v. Quarry Const. Co., 326 Mo. 194 , 219, 30 S.W.2d 1018 ; Keyes v. Chicago, B. Q. Ry. Co., 326 Mo. 236 , 31 S.W.2d 50 , 64.]

State v. Kingsley

108 Mo. 135 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

Com. v. Williams, 6 Gray, 1 ; State v. Hurley, 54 Me. 562 ; State v. Day, 37 Me. 244 ; Bish. Stat. Cr., sec. 1050; Whar. Cr. Ev. [9 Ed.] sec. 715; 26 Alb. … State v. Burgdoerfer, 107 Mo. 1 .

Ingram v. Tompkins

16 Mo. 399 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1852

Gamble v. Johnson, 9 Mo. Rep. 625 . 2. I am utterly at a loss to conceive on what legal or equitable ground the complainants claim a foothold in a court of justice. … In my view, it is a new one, and is not affected, as I conceive, by any thing contained in tbe cases of Prewitt v. Jewell, 9 Mo. Rep. and McNair’s heirs v. Mullanphy’s heirs, 8 Mo. Rep. Decree affirmed.

State v. Ball

339 S.W.2d 783 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1960

In identifying Ball, in addition to the scar on his face, Krekeler was impressed with and remembered the brown ensemble, particularly the “tall brown hat.” … In State v.

City of Harrisonville, Missouri, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. The Board of Trustees of the MO Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund in their Official Capacity, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 2022

Williams v. Kimes, 25 S.W.3d 150, 153 (Mo. banc 2000). … Eagle Waste Indus., LLC v. St.

State v. Lee

303 Mo. 246 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1924

[State v. Pruett, 61 Mo. App. l.c. 158-159, a case later approved by this court; State v. Webster, 206 Mo. l.c. 570; State v. Bonner, 178 Mo. 431 ; State v. Brown, 181 Mo. l.c. 227 et seq.] … [State v. Brown, supra.] In State v.

State ex rel. Garesche v. Drabelle

258 Mo. 568 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1914

Garesche v. Roach, decided at this sitting and reported at page 541 of this report. Respondents *569 herein compose the Board of Election Commissioners of the City of St.

Arbors at Sugar Creek Homeowners Ass'n v. Jefferson Bank & Trust Co.

464 S.W.3d 177 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 2015

In support, homeowners cite three cases from the court of appeals: Harris v. Smith, 250 S.W.3,d 804 (Mo.App. 2008); Webb v. Mullikin, 142 S.W.3d 822 (Mo.App. 2004); and Bumm v. … Pearson v. Koster, 367 S.W.3d 36, 44 (Mo. banc 2012). The circuit court determined, based on the evidence, that the ASC HOA board’s decisions were reasonable and in good faith.

Jones v. Yore

142 Mo. 38 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 7, 1897

Lemon v. … See, also, Brown v. Weatherby, 71 Mo. 152 ; Wickham, Adm’r, v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Laughlin v. Fairbanks, 8 Mo. 370 .

Carver v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad

362 Mo. 897 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1952

See v. Wabash R. Co., 362 Mo. 489 , 242 S. W. 2d 15, 16 [1, 2]; Brown v. Citizens’ State Bank, 345 Mo. 480 , 134 S. W. 2d 116, 118 [1-3]; Holmes v. McNeil, 356 Mo. 846 , 204 S. W. 2d 303, 304 [1, 2]; Nowlin v. … Brown testified that he was “upset” because of the accident when he gave his statement to the claim’ agent. There was corroborating testimony supporting Brown’s testimony at the trial. Gillett v.

Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. McPherson

35 Mo. 13 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1864

(All Saints Church v. Davis, 1 Hall, N. Y., 191; John et al. v. Farm. & Mech. Bk. of Ind., 2 Blackf. 867 ; Chester Glass Co. v. Dewey, 16 Mass. 94 .) 2. As to the invalidity of the calls. … (Trust. of Vernon Soc. v. Hills, 6 Cow. 23 ; All Saints Ch. v. Lovett, 1 Hall, N. Y., 198-9 ; John et al. v. Farm. & Mech. Bk. of Ind., 2 Blackf. 367 ; Ang. & Ames on Corp., 3d ed., 104-5.)

State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Dirckx

321 Mo. 345 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1928

Bank v. Schlotzhauer, 298 S. W. 732 .] As the order of the Cole County Board of Equalization is void it is the duty of respondent to so adjust the tax books that they will conform to the order of the State Board. … And the performance of that duty may be compelled through the institution of a proceeding of this kind by the State Board. [State ex rel. v. Bethards, 320 Mo. 1164 , 9 S. W. (2d) 603 .] Peremptory writ awarded.

State v. Johnson

530 S.W.2d 690 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 1975

The criteria enunciated in Brown v. … Brown v. Illinois, supra, and our cases of State v. Johnson, supra, and State v.

State v. Harris

477 S.W.2d 42 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 22, 1972

State v. Lowe, supra. … State v. Brown, 115 Mo. 409 , 22 S.W. 367 . The court gave an instruction which adequately covered the issue and was not required to accept that offered by the defendant. State v.

Baum v. City of St. Louis

343 Mo. 738 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1938

[Newsom v. Board of Supervisors (Cal. Sup.), 270 P. 676 ; Galvin v. Board of Supervisors, 195 Cal. 686 , 235 P. 450 . See, also, Hopping v. Council of City of Richmond, 170 Cal. 605 , 150 P. 977 ; Hyde v. … [See, also, Newsom et al. v. Board of Supervisors et al., 270 P. 676 .]

Carver v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.

245 S.W.2d 96 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1952

Brown testified that he was "upset" because of the accident when he gave his statement to the claim agent. There was corroborating testimony supporting Brown's testimony at the trial. Gillett v. … . *103 1061, 93 S.W.2d 914, 916 [9, 10]; Brown v. Citizens' State Bank, 345 Mo. 480 , 134 S.W.2d 116, 119 [2]; Ford v. Wabash R. Co., 318 Mo. 723 , 300 S.W. 769, 778 [15]; Weatherford v.

State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Cameron

342 Mo. 830 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 17, 1938

Preisler v. Woodward et al., 340 Mo. 906 , 105 S. W. (2d) 912 , was a mandamus proceeding to compel the election board of the city of St. … Gen. v. Vail, 53 Mo. 97 ; Sheridan v. St. Louis, 183 Mo. 25 , 81 S. W. 1082 , and cases cited therein.]

State ex inf. Walker v. Equitable Loan & Investment Ass'n

142 Mo. 325 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 19, 1898

legislature to take it away, and it will not be intended that a legislative enactment was designed to take such jurisdiction away, although such enactment should confer another and distinct remedy upon some inferior court or board … Circuit Attorney v. Bernoudy, 36 Mo. 279 ; State ex rel. Brown v. McMillan, 108 Mo. 153 .