Case law

Coleman v. Booth

268 Mo. 64 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1916

In Shields v. … [Barry v. Exchange Co., 1 Sandf. Ch. l. c. 307; Williams v. Western U. Tel. Co., 93 N. Y. 162 .]” In Chrisman-Sawyer Banking Co. v. Independence Mfg.

Mingo Drainage District v. Wilson

267 Mo. 268 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 1, 1916

[State ex rel. v. Bugg, 224 Mo. l. c. 554; State ex rel. v. Bates, 235 Mo. l. c. 293; Osborn v. Maxinkuckee Lake Ice Co., 154 Ind. 101 .] … [Railroad v. Gilbert, 3 C. C. A. 264 ; Joy v. State, 41 Tex. Crim. App. 46; Sleep v. Heymann, 57 Wis. 495 ; Babcock v. Beaver Creek Township, 65 Mich. 479 ; Grevenberg v. Borel, 25 La. Ann. 530 .]

State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney General Chris Koster and the Missouri Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund Board of Directors v. ConocoPhillips Company and Phillips 66 Company, and Cory Wagoner

493 S.W.3d 397 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 2016

See Woods v. … See Aherron v. St.

Henry County v. Salmon

201 Mo. 136 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 22, 1907

American Loan & Trust Co., 67 Minn. 112 ; Board of County Commissioners of Renville County v. Gray, 61 Minn. 242 ; Board of Commissioners of Hennepin County v. State Bank, 64 Minn. 180 ; Board of Commissioners of St. … The same result was reached by the Supreme Court of Kansas by approaching the matter from a different viewpoint: Brown v. Board of Commissioners of Wyandotte County, 58 Kan. 672 ; Myers v.

In Re Rahn

316 Mo. 492 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 16, 1927

[Sands v. New York Life Ins. Co., 50 N.Y. 626 ; Brown v. United States, 8 Cranch, 110 .] Nor did the fact that the bequest became operative during the war violate the Trading with the Enemy Act. … In the Cummings case, a bequest was made to the Foreign Mission Board and the Home Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention and the State Board of Missions of the General Association (of the Southern Baptist Church

Timmonds v. Kennish

244 Mo. 318 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 26, 1912

In 1895 a new law was enacted applicable to such cities, estabr *324 lishing a board of election commissioners, and providing in detail a system for- registration. … Brown, page 271, decided at this term, and the same ruling is made in this case. It is ordered that judgment be entered for the defendant. All concur except Kennish and,Brown, JJ., not sitting

State v. Cook

463 S.W.2d 863 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1971

See State v. Caviness, 326 Mo. 992 , 33 S.W.2d 940 ; State v. Pigg, 312 Mo. 212 , 278 S.W. 1030, 1034 ; State v. Fields, 262 Mo. 158 , 170 S.W. 1132, 1134 [2]; State v. Stumbo, 26 Mo. 306 , and State v. … hair, dark brown eyes, light brown complexion, weight 137 pounds'.

Nazeri v. Missouri Valley College

860 S.W.2d 303 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 17, 1993

See Brown v. Kitterman, 443 S.W.2d at 154 . … Brown v. Kitterman, 443 S.W.2d at 151 ; Otto v. Kansas City Star Co., 368 S.W.2d 494, 497 (Mo.1963). In Kirk v.

Elliott v. Kansas City

174 Mo. 554 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 19, 1903

The same rule is announced in Loeser v. Humphrey, 41 Ohio St. 380 ; Reed v. Detroit, 108 Mich. 224 ; Tuttle v. Farmington, 58 N. H. 13; Lyons v. Railroad, 57 N. Y. 489 ; City of Groshen v. … v.

State v. Maguire

69 Mo. 197 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1878

In Nelson v. … In the case of McRae v. Lawrence, 75 N.

State v. Woodward

131 Mo. 369 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1895

Regina v. Hemmings, 4 F. & F. 50; State v. Brown, 104 Mo. 365 ; State v. Moore, 101 Mo. 316 ; State v. O’ Con-nor, 105 Mo. 121 ; State v. Campbell, 108 Mo. 613 ; State v. Cantlin, 118 Mo. 100 ; Brown v.

Witting v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.

101 Mo. 631 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

Louis says: “ Found the crate standing upright near the car door, in good shape ; the boards were not broken. … The following are some of the cases which support this doctrine : Brown v. Express Co., 15 W. Va. 812 ; Berry v. Cooper, 23 Ga. 543 ; Railroad v. Moss, 45 Am. Rep. 428 ( 60 Miss. 1003 ); Graham & Co. v.

Stocke v. Edwards

295 Mo. 402 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 27, 1922

[Newmeyer v. Railroad, 52 Mo. 81 ; Harris v. Langford, 277 Mo. 527 ; Carson v. Sullivan, 284 Mo. 353 ; State ex rel. McMillan v. Woodside, 254 Mo. 580 .] II. … Rice v. Edwards, 241 S.

State ex inf. Danforth v. Butler

524 S.W.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 9, 1975

Brown v. McMillan, 108 Mo. 153 , 18 S.W. 784 , 786 (1891). This is not disputed. … Dalton v.

Cox v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n of St. Louis

331 Mo. 910 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1932

S. 1899, sec. 547; Laws 1905, p. 95; Lee v. Railroad, 195 Mo. 400 ; McGinnis v. Foundry Co., 174 Mo. 225 ; Root v. Railroad, 195 Mo. 348 .] … [Brown v. Ill. Terminal Co., 319 Ill. 326 ; Jeneary v. Traction Co., 306 Ill. 392 , l. c. 397, 398; Ill. Cen. Railroad Co. v. Leiner, 202 Ill. 624 , l. c. 629-632; Chicago City Ry. Co. v.

Jones v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

287 Mo. 64 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 19, 1921

V. … [Morton v. S.T. T. Co., 217 S.W. l.c. 836; Powell v. Railroad, 255 Mo. l.c. 456; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. l.c. 491; Browning v. Ry Co., 124 Mo. l.c. 71-2.] VIII.

City of Kennett v. Katz Construction Co.

273 Mo. 279 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 16, 1918

Brown, in an endeavor to effect the completion of the sewer system in accordance with the original plans and specifications and the changes made at the request of the contractor, in which undertaking the city agreed to pay … The *294 words of the provision, “shall have the right” as applied to the hoard of aldermen, mean no more than that the board is empowered, etc.

Nook v. Zuck

289 Mo. 24 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1921

[Berberet v. Berberet, supra; Mays v. Mays, 114 Mo. 536 ; Grimm v. Tittman, 113 Mo. 56 ; Schierbaum v. Schemme, 157 Mo. 1 ; Cravens v. Faulconer, 28 Mo. 19 .] Directions Given Written in English. II. … [Goedecke v. Lindhorst, 278 Mo. 504 ; Southworth v. Southworth, 173 Mo. l. c. 73; Spencer v. Spencer, 221 S. W. 58 ; Defoe v. Defoe, 144 Mo. 458 .] chad^ TV.

City of St. Louis v. Ruecking

232 Mo. 325 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1911

Joseph v. Anthony, 30 Mo. 537 ; Cole v. Skrainka, 105 Mo. 303 ; Steffen v. Fox, 124 Mo. 630 ; Johnson v. Duer, 115 Mo. 366 ; Asphalt Paving Co. v. Ullman, 137 Mo. l. c. 570; Whitworth v. … In Steffen v.

Harvey v. Long

260 Mo. 374 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 2, 1914

She kept a boarding house in Columbia for five years while he attended the Missouri State University, graduating from the law department just before the bringing of this suit. … J., and Brown, J., concur. Walker and Faris, JJ., concur in the result. Woodson and Bond, JJ., dissent. Graves, J., dissents in an opinion filed.