Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.50s
State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Moore
322 Mo. 329 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 27, 1929
Again in Belk v. … Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFarmer v. Barlow Truck Lines, Inc.
979 S.W.2d 169 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 3, 1998
Doe Run v. Brown, 918 S.W.2d 303 (Mo.App.1996), and the Western District in State ex rel[.] Famous Barr v. … To the extent Doneff v. Treasurer of State of Missouri, 965 S.W.2d 255 (1998), 3 and Brown are contrary to this opinion, they are overruled.
Cited 21 timesPublished936 S.W.2d 797 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 21, 1997
Id.; Brown v. Van Noy, 879 S.W.2d 667, 673 (Mo.App.1994). In Brown , the court of appeals found an instruction similar to that in the instant case to be erroneous and prejudicial. Brown, 879 S.W.2d at 673 . … State v. Watson, 672 S.W.2d 701, 703 (Mo.App.1984), citing Domijan v. Harp, 340 S.W.2d 728, 734 (Mo.1960).
Cited 37 timesPublishedHoffman v. Dickinson Operating Co.
468 S.W.2d 26 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1971
State v. Hartstein, Mo.Sup., 469 S.W.2d 329 , decided April 12, 1971.) We find support for our position in Wagonheim v. … Maryland State Board of Censors, 255 Md. 297 , 258 A.2d 240 (affirmed by an equally divided Court in Grove Press, Inc., et al. v. Maryland State Board of Censors, 401 U.S. 480 , 91 S.Ct. 966 , 28 L.Ed.2d 205, 1971 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished282 Mo. 425 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 18, 1920
The Board of Equalization, although its acts are judicial (State ex rel. Van Raalte v. Board of Equalization, 256 Mo. l. c. 461), is not a tribunal within the meaning of the Constitution. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 63 Mo. 294 .
Cited 24 timesPublishedScrivner v. American Car and Foundry Co.
330 Mo. 408 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 1932
Louis Gunning Advertising Co. v. Wanamaker Brown, 115 Mo. App. 270 , 90 S.W. 737 .] … [Butler v. Lawson, 72 Mo. 227 ; Bulkley v. Big Muddy Iron Co., 77 Mo. 105 ; Gregory v. McCormick, 120 Mo. 657 , 25 S.W. 565 ; Ashton v. Penfield, 233 Mo. 391 , 135 S.W. 938 ; New England Loan Trust Co. v. Brown, 59 Mo.
Cited 32 timesPublished576 S.W.3d 183 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 25, 2019
V, sec. 4. A writ of mandamus may issue upon proof of a “clear, unequivocal specific right to a thing claimed.” U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs v. Boresi, 396 S.W.3d 356, 359 (Mo. banc 2013) (quoting Furlong Cos. v. … Louis v. Kinder, 698 S.W.2d 4, 6 (Mo. banc 1985). When there “is a specific venue provision; it supersedes the general venue statute, section 508.010.” Igoe v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCastilo v. State Highway Commission
312 Mo. 244 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1925
Thus in Brown v. … [Brown v. Patterson, 224 Mo. l. c. 658, supra; Reagan v. County Court, 226 Mo. l. c. 89, supra.]
Cited 39 timesPublished485 S.W.3d 353 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 2016
Kirkwood Glass Co. v. … V. sec. 3. 4 auspice of statutory construction. Sw. Bell Yellow Pages, Inc. v.
Cited 27 timesPublished592 S.W.2d 819 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1980
Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779 (Mo.1976). … State v. Crawford, 478 S.W.2d 314 (Mo.1972).
Cited 54 timesPublished250 S.W.3d 705 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 2008
See State v. … Defendant contends that the report would have contradicted the State’s attempt to impeach Brown. This Court, however, found in State v.
Cited 49 timesPublished194 Mo. 281 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 1906
The killing of Brown by the defendant was admitted; the defense interposed was self-defense. … The evidence tended to show that the defendant and Brown were < slightly acquainted. There was no evidence of any previous quarrel or ill- *287 will between tbe defendant and the deceased, Brown.
Cited 43 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Terminal R.R. Assn. v. Hostetter
342 Mo. 859 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 8, 1938
Louis Court of Appeals bringing up the record in Brown v. Terminal Railroad Assn., 85 S. … Louis Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction of the Brown case.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUtility Service & Maintenance, Inc. v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
163 S.W.3d 910 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 2005
Louis law firm of Brown & James to represent Noranda in the lawsuit. … This Court held, in Alack v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedState ex rel. Lamport v. Robinson
257 Mo. 584 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1914
BROWN, J., Mandamus to compel a division of the circuit court of Jackson County to return a case to the general docket of said court. … Schonhoff v. O’Bryan, Judge, 102 Mo. 254 ; State ex rel. v. Gibson, 187 Mo. 536 ; State ex rel. v. Grimm, 220 Mo. 483 ; State ex rel. v. Broaddus, 234 Mo. 331 .]
Cited 5 timesPublishedCity of Kennett v. Katz Construction Co.
273 Mo. 279 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 16, 1918
Brown, in an endeavor to effect the completion of the sewer system in accordance with the original plans and specifications and the changes made at the request of the contractor, in which undertaking the city agreed to pay … The *294 words of the provision, “shall have the right” as applied to the hoard of aldermen, mean no more than that the board is empowered, etc.
Cited 42 timesPublishedSherlock v. Duck Creek Township
338 Mo. 866 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1936
Brown, 104 Wis. 493 ; United States Natl. Bank v. Shupak (Mont.), 172 P. 324 ; First Natl. Bank v. Chilson, 45 Neb. 257 ; Cashion Gin Co. v. Reisch (Okla.), 289 P. 701 ; Carpenter v. … McLaughlin, 12 R.I. 270 ; Wood Co. v. Merchants' Saving, etc., Co., 41 Ill. 267 ; Glatt v. Fortman, 120 Ind. 384 ; State Natl. Bank v. Hyatt, 75 Ark. 170 ; Binghampton Pharmacy v. First Natl.
Cited 3 timesPublished471 S.W.2d 173 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971
The same point was raised in State v. Browning, Mo., 442 S.W.2d 55 . In that case, Browning and others were guests at a private party. As the party “broke up”, Browning discovered that his coat was missing. … State v. Haygood, Mo., 411 S.W.2d 230 ; State v. Malone, Mo., 301 S.W.2d 750 ; State v. Vincent, Mo., 321 S.W.2d 439 .
Cited 3 timesPublished404 S.W.2d 689 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1966
(Thomas Brown’s testimony.) Richard Brown picked up a large cluster of bricks and concrete and dropped it on Coleman. … See People v. Gunner, 15 N.Y.2d 226 , 257 N.Y.S.2d 924 , 205 N.E.2d 852, 855-856 ; State v. Vigliano, 43 N.J. 44, 49-52 , 202 A.2d 657 ; Bean v. State of Nevada, Nev., 398 P.2d 251, 253-255 ; Browne v.
Cited 36 timesPublished136 S.W.3d 799 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 22, 2004
Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d 721, 726 (Mo. banc 2002). Cause. Taylor must show that an “objective factor external to the defense impeded [his] efforts to comply” with Rule 24.035. State ex rel. Nixon v. … See Brown v. Gammon, 947 S.W.2d 437, 440 (Mo.App.1997); see also Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d at 731 .
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna