Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Moore

    322 Mo. 329 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 27, 1929

    Again in Belk v. … Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Farmer v. Barlow Truck Lines, Inc.

    979 S.W.2d 169 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 3, 1998

    Doe Run v. Brown, 918 S.W.2d 303 (Mo.App.1996), and the Western District in State ex rel[.] Famous Barr v. … To the extent Doneff v. Treasurer of State of Missouri, 965 S.W.2d 255 (1998), 3 and Brown are contrary to this opinion, they are overruled.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Lasky v. Union Electric Co.

    936 S.W.2d 797 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 21, 1997

    Id.; Brown v. Van Noy, 879 S.W.2d 667, 673 (Mo.App.1994). In Brown , the court of appeals found an instruction similar to that in the instant case to be erroneous and prejudicial. Brown, 879 S.W.2d at 673 . … State v. Watson, 672 S.W.2d 701, 703 (Mo.App.1984), citing Domijan v. Harp, 340 S.W.2d 728, 734 (Mo.1960).

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. Dickinson Operating Co.

    468 S.W.2d 26 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1971

    State v. Hartstein, Mo.Sup., 469 S.W.2d 329 , decided April 12, 1971.) We find support for our position in Wagonheim v. … Maryland State Board of Censors, 255 Md. 297 , 258 A.2d 240 (affirmed by an equally divided Court in Grove Press, Inc., et al. v. Maryland State Board of Censors, 401 U.S. 480 , 91 S.Ct. 966 , 28 L.Ed.2d 205, 1971 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Gardner v. Hall

    282 Mo. 425 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 18, 1920

    The Board of Equalization, although its acts are judicial (State ex rel. Van Raalte v. Board of Equalization, 256 Mo. l. c. 461), is not a tribunal within the meaning of the Constitution. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 63 Mo. 294 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Scrivner v. American Car and Foundry Co.

    330 Mo. 408 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 24, 1932

    Louis Gunning Advertising Co. v. Wanamaker Brown, 115 Mo. App. 270 , 90 S.W. 737 .] … [Butler v. Lawson, 72 Mo. 227 ; Bulkley v. Big Muddy Iron Co., 77 Mo. 105 ; Gregory v. McCormick, 120 Mo. 657 , 25 S.W. 565 ; Ashton v. Penfield, 233 Mo. 391 , 135 S.W. 938 ; New England Loan Trust Co. v. Brown, 59 Mo.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, Relator v. The Honorable Joseph L. Green

    576 S.W.3d 183 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 25, 2019

    V, sec. 4. A writ of mandamus may issue upon proof of a “clear, unequivocal specific right to a thing claimed.” U.S. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs v. Boresi, 396 S.W.3d 356, 359 (Mo. banc 2013) (quoting Furlong Cos. v. … Louis v. Kinder, 698 S.W.2d 4, 6 (Mo. banc 1985). When there “is a specific venue provision; it supersedes the general venue statute, section 508.010.” Igoe v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Castilo v. State Highway Commission

    312 Mo. 244 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1925

    Thus in Brown v. … [Brown v. Patterson, 224 Mo. l. c. 658, supra; Reagan v. County Court, 226 Mo. l. c. 89, supra.]

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Macon County Emergency Services Board v. Macon County Commission, Alan Wyatt, in his official capacity as a Macon County Commissioner, Drew Belt, in his official capacity as a Macon County Commissioner, and Jon Dwiggins, in his official capacity as a Macon County Commissioner

    485 S.W.3d 353 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 2016

    Kirkwood Glass Co. v. … V. sec. 3. 4 auspice of statutory construction. Sw. Bell Yellow Pages, Inc. v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Prokopf v. Whaley

    592 S.W.2d 819 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 15, 1980

    Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779 (Mo.1976). … State v. Crawford, 478 S.W.2d 314 (Mo.1972).

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • State v. Salter

    250 S.W.3d 705 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 2008

    See State v. … Defendant contends that the report would have contradicted the State’s attempt to impeach Brown. This Court, however, found in State v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • State v. Beckner

    194 Mo. 281 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 1906

    The killing of Brown by the defendant was admitted; the defense interposed was self-defense. … The evidence tended to show that the defendant and Brown were < slightly acquainted. There was no evidence of any previous quarrel or ill- *287 will between tbe defendant and the deceased, Brown.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Terminal R.R. Assn. v. Hostetter

    342 Mo. 859 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 8, 1938

    Louis Court of Appeals bringing up the record in Brown v. Terminal Railroad Assn., 85 S. … Louis Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction of the Brown case.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Utility Service & Maintenance, Inc. v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.

    163 S.W.3d 910 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 2005

    Louis law firm of Brown & James to represent Noranda in the lawsuit. … This Court held, in Alack v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Lamport v. Robinson

    257 Mo. 584 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1914

    BROWN, J., Mandamus to compel a division of the circuit court of Jackson County to return a case to the general docket of said court. … Schonhoff v. O’Bryan, Judge, 102 Mo. 254 ; State ex rel. v. Gibson, 187 Mo. 536 ; State ex rel. v. Grimm, 220 Mo. 483 ; State ex rel. v. Broaddus, 234 Mo. 331 .]

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of Kennett v. Katz Construction Co.

    273 Mo. 279 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 16, 1918

    Brown, in an endeavor to effect the completion of the sewer system in accordance with the original plans and specifications and the changes made at the request of the contractor, in which undertaking the city agreed to pay … The *294 words of the provision, “shall have the right” as applied to the hoard of aldermen, mean no more than that the board is empowered, etc.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Sherlock v. Duck Creek Township

    338 Mo. 866 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 21, 1936

    Brown, 104 Wis. 493 ; United States Natl. Bank v. Shupak (Mont.), 172 P. 324 ; First Natl. Bank v. Chilson, 45 Neb. 257 ; Cashion Gin Co. v. Reisch (Okla.), 289 P. 701 ; Carpenter v. … McLaughlin, 12 R.I. 270 ; Wood Co. v. Merchants' Saving, etc., Co., 41 Ill. 267 ; Glatt v. Fortman, 120 Ind. 384 ; State Natl. Bank v. Hyatt, 75 Ark. 170 ; Binghampton Pharmacy v. First Natl.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Simpson

    471 S.W.2d 173 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 13, 1971

    The same point was raised in State v. Browning, Mo., 442 S.W.2d 55 . In that case, Browning and others were guests at a private party. As the party “broke up”, Browning discovered that his coat was missing. … State v. Haygood, Mo., 411 S.W.2d 230 ; State v. Malone, Mo., 301 S.W.2d 750 ; State v. Vincent, Mo., 321 S.W.2d 439 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Beasley

    404 S.W.2d 689 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1966

    (Thomas Brown’s testimony.) Richard Brown picked up a large cluster of bricks and concrete and dropped it on Coleman. … See People v. Gunner, 15 N.Y.2d 226 , 257 N.Y.S.2d 924 , 205 N.E.2d 852, 855-856 ; State v. Vigliano, 43 N.J. 44, 49-52 , 202 A.2d 657 ; Bean v. State of Nevada, Nev., 398 P.2d 251, 253-255 ; Browne v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Moore

    136 S.W.3d 799 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 22, 2004

    Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d 721, 726 (Mo. banc 2002). Cause. Taylor must show that an “objective factor external to the defense impeded [his] efforts to comply” with Rule 24.035. State ex rel. Nixon v. … See Brown v. Gammon, 947 S.W.2d 437, 440 (Mo.App.1997); see also Brown v. State, 66 S.W.3d at 731 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.